Sports Media News

Keeping Up With All The Industry Press Releases

  • ABC
  • CBS
    • ShowTime
  • NBC
    • NBC Sports Network
    • Universal
    • Telemundo
    • Comcast
      • Golf Channel
  • FOX
    • Fox Sports1
    • Fox Sports2
    • FOX Sports Radio
  • ESPN
  • Turner
    • TNT
    • TBS
    • Sports Illustrated
    • Bleacher Report
    • truTV
  • NFLN
  • MLBN
  • NBA TV
  • NHLN
  • HBO
  • Sirius/XM

TRANSCRIPT – NBC SPORTS 2023 NASCAR PREVIEW MEDIA CONFERENCE CALL

June 20, 2023 By admin

Tuesday, June 20, 2023

THE MODERATOR: Thank you, everyone, for joining us today. In just a moment we’re going to be joined by executive producer and president of NBC Sports Production, Sam Flood, and our NASCAR analysts, Dale Earnhardt Jr., Jeff Burton, Steve Letarte and Dale Jarrett.

NBC Sports takes over the second half of 2023 NASCAR season beginning this Sunday at Nashville Superspeedway in primetime at 7 p.m. eastern on NBC. Then next week the much-anticipated inaugural running of the Chicago Street Race will be presented on Sunday, July 2, at 5:30 p.m. eastern on NBC and Peacock.

In total, NBC Sports will present 39 races across NBC, USA Network and Peacock this season, including Cup Series races airing on the NBC Broadcast Network, including the final six races of the NASCAR Cup Series Playoff culminating at Phoenix Raceway Sunday, November 5.

We’ll start with opening remarks from each of our speakers, then take your questions.

With that I’ll turn it over to our executive producer, Sam Flood.

SAM FLOOD: Thank you all for joining us. We are thrilled to get going. We love the 20 race weeks we get to rock through here at NBC. The whole team was together yesterday in Charlotte to talk through the final prep for the season. We’ve been watching races all year, mapping and planning, ready to make some magic as our half of the NASCAR season launches this weekend.

So excited to launch in primetime in Nashville, then the following weekend with the Chicago race. NASCAR has committed so many resources to that race, has engaged us on this concept for a number of years now. The reality is it’s going to happen and we’re going to see it live, be able to bring that incredible event to the country on July 2.

It’s exciting to everyone at NBC Sports. We know how important it is to our partners at NASCAR to do a great job on this. No better team than the group of talent and production staff that we have assembled to execute it. We’re thrilled about that.

For Chicago, we’re going to have a couple of drones, do it radio style. We’re going to have all the bells and whistles that make big events bigger, which is one of our big philosophies at NBC.

This is year nine of our current partnership, and we’ve loved every minute of it. We look forward to hopefully partnering with NASCAR for many years to come.

One thing we’re adding to every race this year, all 20 weeks, we’re going to have a post-race show on Peacock. As soon as the checkered flag waves, whether on USA or NBC, Peacock will fire up and have the post-race and keep that coverage going for a minimum of 30 minutes every week as we give the fans a place to really consume the back end and tell all the stories and talk to all the heroes and the G.O.A.T.s, frustrated, happy, the fighters and lovers. All that’s going to happen at the end of the race. So we’re excited to add that to our repertoire on a regular bases.

With that, I send it off to Dale Jr., who has been a big addition to our team, loves the sport more than anyone, and he is the Pied Piper for NASCAR. It’s time to get that pipe out and get to work, Junior.

DALE EARNHARDT JR.: I appreciate it, Sam.

That meeting yesterday with the entire NBC team I think got everybody fired up about what we’re about to do. It’s an incredibly rewarding job to be able to be a part of the broadcast team and bring these incredible races and exciting races to fans at home.

We have a great season with lots of storylines. Last year was a really insane year with the new car and all of its challenges, all of the things that was creating in terms of drama and surprises and problems for the teams.

This year, they have sort of doubled down on creating drama. It’s not so much the car this year, it’s the drivers. There’s been a lot of disagreements on the racetrack, if you will, and a bit of a tug of war between veterans’ mindsets and young drivers trying to learn their race craft.

There is a bit of a middle ground where we had drivers that we might have called young guns just a few years ago are sort of now in the middle of their careers trying to figure out who they are, what their legacy will be.

It’s been a fascinating year. I’m sure that that is going to, as it does every year, kind of crescendo and build as we get closer to the Playoffs. The pressure will mount. The risk taking will increase. The excitement that that creates for us will be plentiful.

Going to Nashville for the first race, incredible market for us. The track itself has produced some really, really great racing. I’m excited. This car races really well at these type of racetracks, the bigger mile, mile-and-a-half racetracks. This race will be an entertaining race for sure.

We have just a lot going on. Chase Elliott trying to figure out how to get himself into the Playoffs will be a fascinating thing to watch over the next several weeks. There’s just a bunch of storylines. I’m excited to talk about it with my teammates.

One of those being Jeff Burton. I’ll pass it to him.

JEFF BURTON: Thank you, Junior.

First of all, it’s an honor to be part of this team. We all love this sport a great deal. It’s really fun for us to get together and talk racing.

We watch all the races anyway. We get to do it in front of millions of people which makes it even cooler. Super proud to be on this team not just with the analysts and the people talking, but all the people behind the scenes. They do such an incredible job. Proud to be part of that.

We step into this second half of the year with a lot of momentum, some really good races, and also the pressure is starting to ramp up to make the Playoffs.

On top of that, you look at the upcoming schedule, it’s wild. There’s Chicago, which is a huge unknown, which is going to be an incredible event. No one has ever set foot on this racetrack. Limited practice. It’s just going to be from a team standpoint and driver standpoint an incredible challenge, which is what NASCAR is all about. It’s supposed to be hard.

Multiple superspeedway races, multiple road courses. All that going on while people are trying to make the Playoffs. Junior talked about it earlier, about last year, how many different winners we had. No matter how many winners you have, no matter how many, it’s still going to be a battle for points.

Winding down to the regular season end, there’s an incredible points battle to make the Playoffs. That’s only going to get more intense. As that happens, the drivers try to go faster, try to make stuff happen, and that is just so much fun to watch. The more difficult it is for the competitors, the more fun it is for the fans to watch. That’s in every single sport.

As this regular season builds, who can step up? Who is going to be the driver that takes himself to a limit and level he’s never been to before? Who isn’t capable of doing that? That’s what we love to talk about and love to show.

I’m super excited about what we’re going to see over the next 20 weeks. Like I said, I get to do it with my buddies. We have a great time and have fun. Perhaps the leader of the fun is Steve Letarte. We’ll turn it over to him.

STEVE LETARTE: I’ll take the title as the leader of the fun.

It’s been a fun year for motorsports, truly, nationally and globally. Part of the coverage at the Rolex at Daytona to start this off, being able to see the closing laps of the Indy 500 in person, watching all of the NASCAR races, and now I just reiterate what the first two gentlemen have said that will be on air with me, and that’s the excitement to take over this NASCAR coverage.

Last year it was about the number of winners. This year I think it’s about the lack of dominance. While the number of winners may be a little less, the amount of cars running in the top five or top 10 are not. We’ve never seen a points race this close. Seven cars within 32 points. That’s less than a race. Leaving Nashville, the guy in seventh could be the points leader. It’s quite unbelievable.

When you think about what we have in front of us, Chicago, I never spent much time in Chicago. Went there a few weeks ago and walked the circuit. When I saw it in person, its location, the Skyline in the background, I just can’t imagine how great of an event it’s going to be, the concerts, true entertainment weekend. I think that’s important.

Then we get to kind of close our way, the pressure of making the Playoffs. Then the Playoffs in general. Every year these drivers redefine what they’re willing to do. If they are willing to be like what they’ve been in the regular season, I don’t know what the Playoffs will bring.

I know when it comes, when those actions are there, there’s no better team to cover it, no better analyst to talk about it in our pre-race and post-race, our Hall of Famer Dale Jarrett. I don’t think there’s a more trusted opinion in the garage. I’ll toss it over to him.

DALE JARRETT: I appreciate it, Steve. I don’t know about all of that, but I appreciate those accolades.

What everybody has said, you understand the passion that we have here for the sport that we’ve been involved in for a very long time. We take this very seriously. Being prepared, giving everyone the best story lines that we possibly can, then obviously covering the race, we have the people to do that from the beginning to the end, then after that covering everything that went on that day. Looking forward to doing that, my part of that, with Kyle Petty, Brad Daugherty, Marty Snider, we’ll try to bring you everything that we possibly can.

So far this year I think, as Junior was pointing out, we’ve had a lot of feelings hurt and people getting mad at each other. That has created a lot of different things.

But I think the other storyline is that what we have seen these teams willing to do that has been a part of NASCAR for all 75 years as far as I know, that pushing the limit, what they can do to these cars to get them and their driver a little bit of an advantage. That comes with some heavy fines dollar-wise and points-wise. It has some drivers in a very difficult position here as we only have these 10 races to go. It’s going to be very interesting.

Steve was just pointing out the battle for the regular season championship. We haven’t seen this many drivers with the opportunity to gather those points and that trophy and everything that goes along with that. We haven’t seen that since this Playoff format started end this way.

Really excited to get back. New venues. Even the old ones that we’ve been going to for many years, it’s going to fuel some exciting races. We’re ready to get started.

THE MODERATOR: We can open it now for questions from the press.

Q. Sam, what are the challenges in capturing the images and having the camerawork at the street race in Chicago? Is this one of the harder venues since it’s so new that you have to figure out where to place everyone? What sort of production elements are we going to see?

SAM FLOOD: It’s the ultimate challenge to be the first people to televise a race at a course that’s never been televised before.

Our lead producer, Jeff Behnke, has taken the race producer, Rene, and director Sean, to the track multiple times and they mapped out where the cameras will go.

Obviously the sense of space and the spectacle of being in the middle of the city is important. Going to shoot the race a little bit differently. You’ve got to shoot it to capture the size and the scope of what is being executed here. So we’re going to have two drones flying around to capture that energy. We’ll have an overhead helicopter that’s able to give us the spectacle as well.

Rather than have a traditional booth, the talent will be spread around the racetrack. Jeff Burton will be in one corner, throw it off to Dale Junior in the other, Steve Letarte will be with Rick Allen somewhere else, Mike Bagley will be elsewhere on the track. The cars will go from announcer to announcer to announcer as they navigate the racetrack.

Obviously we’ve done tests. There’s a virtual simulation of the track that the drivers are practicing on. We’re able to look at that simulation to decide where cameras are best suited.

But as was said earlier on this call, until you see the cars actually driving on the track, you don’t know for certain how they’ll execute. So we’re going to be ready to adjust after the practices take place and after the Xfinity race on Saturday.

We’re excited, confident, and really eager to showcase the city of Chicago, the sport of NASCAR, and the opportunity to grow the sport to a new audience on an American celebration weekend.

Q. Jeff and Dale, have you guys spent much time in the simulator getting a feel for yourself of what the Chicago street course is going to be like?

DALE EARNHARDT JR.: I raced in the iRacing Invitational that we had several years ago that was I believe the sort of the beginning conversation. I think that was the beginning idea of could this actually really happen.

I ran around that track a little bit on the simulator and have it on iRacing. I think that will probably be, outside of the manufacture’s simulator, the drivers will spend tons of time at their home messing with it. It’s full of challenges that I can speak to.

I think for me, cresting over the hill, over the bridge into turn seven will be tough. It’s blind coming up over the hill. As soon as the car lands, you’re going to have to be in the braking zone. There’s some funnels or choke points where the track gets very narrow. It goes from this very wide straightaway into this narrow-type corner. Turn seven is a great example of that where they basically are forced from five lanes down to three.

There will be some arguments over who has the right-of-way into those positions and those areas. I think there will be quite a lot of contact.

The one thing that I think about when I think about Chicago is every time anything new, no matter what it is, track, car, tire, any kind of new development is thrown into the industry, it’s chaotic and it’s problematic. Why wouldn’t the very first street course present unforeseen, unintended consequences and challenges to these teams?

You can plan. You can be ready, prepare, feel like you’ve crossed every T and dotted every I. You’re ready for whatever might happen. But this has never been done before, so there’s going to be some implications and consequences that won’t be thought about, won’t be prepared for, that I feel like we’ll experience.

That will create moments, that will create some really intense, great moments for us to see as teams and drivers are going through adversity that none of us have ever watched happen before. I expect it to be like that.

JEFF BURTON: As far as iRacing goes, I have not yet — Harrison and I have talked about it. He’s been on it a fair amount. Been over to his house. Gets in his rig, drives some.

I think, going off of what Junior just said, these new races and these new events do quite often create chaos, and that’s with going to races and testing, going to places and having data.

I mean, even if you think about our new tracks, the manufacturers will send a team, and that data is provided to all the manufacturers, every Ford, every Chevy, every Toyota. That’s not happening in two weeks.

It’s going to be the first time they see it is the first time anyone sees it. I actually think that’s awesome. I think the more things we can throw at our drivers and throw at our teams to get them out of their comfort zone, it raises their level and it shows us who the very best are in certain situations.

I think there will be a tremendous amount of time, perhaps more than ever, spent on any type of simulation you can get your hands on. It’s for real going to be a major challenge.

Q. Steve, from a crew chief perspective, going into a race that’s never really been done before, how do you handle this? How do you navigate this? Especially a race that is expected to be a full contact race with many cautions?

STEVE LETARTE: The concept of street racing isn’t new. We’ve seen street racing in other series. I would study some of those, like what makes a successful INDYCAR race, how do you win, track position, tires. If I’m at Team Penske, I would lean on my fellow Team Penske cars that compete at Long Beach or just competed on the streets of Detroit, and understand.

While the cars may be different, the concept of a race over a distance with one winner, with pit strategy and fuel, I mean, that’s a universal language. I think that would have to be studied.

Then the other part is to be completely open-minded and to generate a level of expectation. We talk a lot about the circuit. We haven’t talked a lot about the surface. I expect lap one till the last lap of the race for it to continue to get faster and faster and faster as the streets are transitioned from a street to a race circuit, as the tire rubber goes down.

Your approach is going to have to be very, very different. Your expectation, your process, everything you learn about tackling a track or a weekend is going to have to be a bit forgotten and you’re going to have to really approach this as a completely new challenge.

That goes back to what the two drivers said. When I hear ‘chaos’ or ‘challenge’, what I can’t wait to see is who exceeds, who reaches a different level. We saw it at the dirt track. We’ve seen it in wet conditions. Time and time again, athletes and race teams are tested, and someone is going to have to win this inaugural race here.

That would be my sales pitch to the team. It’s easy to look at the challenges, but look at the opportunity, and the approach is definitely going to have to be different.

Q. Dale Jr., obviously getting ready for Sunday’s race, Nashville, the chance to finish under the lights in prime time, are you monitoring the progress on the agreement to get NASCAR possibly back at the fairgrounds track? You’ve been a fairly big proponent of that. Does it feel maybe closer than it’s ever been before at this point?

DALE EARNHARDT JR.: I definitely keep an eye on that particular situation or anything else that might be unique and new or a potentially new experience in NASCAR.

But from what I’m told by Marcus Smith and his group, everything is moving forward in the right direction. I will say that I have been as excited as I am to one day have some form of NASCAR back at the fairgrounds. I am really overly impressed with the speedway and how well it has fit back into the NASCAR landscape.

I feel like there is room for both. My appreciation and the appeal to the speedway for me has increased quite a bit over the last two years we’ve been there. So while I’m looking forward to whatever the future may hold for the fairgrounds, I feel like the speedway has earned its position and earned its place.

The races are spectacular, the track is wide, and provides drivers with places to go to pass. It’s just been compelling so far.

Yeah, I’m looking forward to all the news. Any time there’s some good news coming out of the fairgrounds, I’m happy to see it. Hopefully that’s progressing well. Marcus tells me it is.

Q. Dale Jr., I think you found Josh Berry back in 2010. You believed with him, stuck with him. I guess it would be about 13 years. Now he’s on the verge of finally having that breakthrough of his career. What did you see in him? What made you stick with him all this time?

DALE EARNHARDT JR.: We have a late model stock program that Carson Kvapil currently races for. It’s a placeholder for extremely talented drivers that deserve opportunity, and drivers that I believe have what it takes to go to the next level. It’s a place for them to drive a well-equipped car that can win, to be able to keep their name in the conversation.

I enjoy that late model program being a success, winning races. Josh was a big part of that. He helped build that program into what it is today. We won over a hundred feature races and multiple track championships and the national title. Won all the big races at Martinsville and everywhere you could think of.

We always knew in the back of our minds that might just be his legacy. But we found ourselves in a position to give him some opportunities in our Xfinity car. That was basically like, Hey, here’s like a very meager chance to show what you can do. Go out there and you have to make it happen. We don’t know whether this is all we’ll be able to allow.

He won at Martinsville in one of those abbreviated opportunities. I mean, I cried like if he was my brother. It’s hard to describe the emotion, but it was incredible.

So since then we’ve continued to, because of his on-track success, draw more support and interest in his career. We’ve gotten new partners and sponsors that want to get behind this Josh Berry thing.

It took a lot of work and a lot of effort of staying after it. But I feel like it’s paying off. What a team will get when they sign Josh Berry to a Cup deal is a driver with great race craft and a turn-key winner. Whereas it’s incredible and a great opportunity to sign a young driver that will develop into a champion, I believe you get to skip those years of development with a guy like Josh, and you get right into working on the championship part and winning races because he’s there mentally, professionally, and in talent.

It’s just incredible to imagine that he’s getting interest, going to get an opportunity. It’s a dream come true for him. Think about all the other local short track racers that look at that path that he took and think that there’s a real chance for them, too, if they shine.

If they get a big enough light shone on them in front of the right person or the right people, they’ll find the support they need to get to the next level. The path still exists.

Q. Sam, you talked at the start about how much you love NASCAR. It’s well-known the negotiating window. Are you in it? Are you in the talks?

SAM FLOOD: That’s the beauty of my job. I’m the content guy. There’s the commerce group. I’m not part of the commerce group. The commerce group likes NASCAR as much as the content group, and hopefully we can get this done.

Q. Does the content group pass that message on?

SAM FLOOD: The commerce group knows how much I love NASCAR, how much I love doing this, how proud we are of the work we do with NASCAR. Everyone is aware of that. Hopefully we can take the checkered flag.

Q. Dale, I’m curious with the announcement today that Josh Harris’ group is buying into Joe Gibbs Racing, as a Commanders fan, does it mean anything to have Gibbs and Harris connected? What do you think it can do for the race team as well?

DALE EARNHARDT JR.: I think that’s fascinating news for Joe Gibbs. I think for anybody who wondered what the future was for that organization, they now have that answer.

They’ll continue their relationship they had with manufacturers and partners and sponsorships while also entertaining new interested partners.

With the Harris group, the sky’s the limit. They would have to feel like that’s going to present a lot of new opportunities for the program to move forward and be successful.

I think to be quite honest, we have so many incredible, successful owners in this sport. But like the race car drivers, the owners, there’s going to be a moment where they will no longer be owners in this sport for whatever reason. They have a shelf-life like everything else.

Where does the next group or next round of owners come from? You’ve seen some incredible things happen with Brad Keselowski and Denny Hamlin.

This is a great thing for NASCAR. It’s absolutely great for Joe Gibbs. However that may bridge the connection between NASCAR and the Washington Commanders I’m all about, because I’m a massive fan obviously. I love it. I think it’s a great thing. I think we all wondered, what was going to be the future for Gibbs, and this is the answer.

Q. Dale Jarrett, I’m curious about your experience of seeing the Chicago track when you were up there recently, what stood out to you about that, what you’re looking forward to for that race broadcast?

DALE JARRETT: There’s so much. Before I went there, really couldn’t envision what it might be, what may take place. But being there a couple of weeks ago, you could see that there’s a lot of different layers to this.

It’s obviously a huge weekend for NASCAR. I know they’ve gone out on the limb in doing this, in doing something totally different than NASCAR has ever done before.

Then for the city of Chicago, for Julie Giese to leave Phoenix Raceway and take the reins to make all of this happen, she’s done a phenomenal job there getting the city and the people there onboard with this.

The track is going to be a challenge, but what I also saw is there are going to be opportunities for good racing. That’s kind of going to be a by-product of all this.

As Jeff Burton was pointing out earlier, nobody has any experience on this, so they don’t know exactly where their best passing opportunities are. With the simulators you can see one thing, but when you get out there against real people and competitors, you’re going to find things to be a little different.

I’m really excited about this. I think it has the opportunity to be one of the biggest events that NASCAR has had in a long, long time. Just glad we’re going to be there to present it.

As another by-product, the whole setting is just going to be spectacular. Fans that are going to be there, I think they’ve sold tickets to people from all 50 states, most continents, and a lot of countries. A lot of interest in this first-time street race for NASCAR.

Again, looking forward to it. I really believe that we’re going to see some good racing on top of everything else.

Q. Dale Jr., obviously nobody puts more pressure on themselves than the driver themselves. In the next 10 races there’s going to be a lot of focus on Chase Elliott. If he doesn’t win, doesn’t gain points, it’s going to amp up week after week. When you are the most popular driver, you are not having the success, how can that build upon somebody? How do you prevent from that overwhelming you? What are the challenges that Chase may go through if he doesn’t win in Nashville, Chicago, we start doing a countdown as we get to the end of the regular season?

DALE EARNHARDT JR.: Yeah, that’s going to become difficult because that’s what is going to happen. As we get closer and closer towards the Playoffs, the opportunities become fewer and fewer, there will be a bit of a focus put on Chase.

There were moments this year when he was not in the car and there were some differences in how that affected viewership for NASCAR. There’s been this sort of attention solely focused on what Chase means to the sport and the industry as a whole.

If he is to not make the Playoffs, how would that be viewed from an industry-wide standpoint? There will be more and more pressure and intensity. He’s going to feel like not only does he want to get in there because he wants to be there, wants to compete, he feels like he belongs there.

But he’s going to feel pressure from the industry, from NASCAR, from fans, from the TV booths. Everywhere he looks, he’s going to feel like everyone is waiting on him to check that box.

That is hard to escape. Even though most of it may not be actual reality, it’s likely that’s the sense or the feeling or the way it might impact him.

It’s really hard to hide from that. It’s hard to get that out of your mind, especially if you continue to fall short. The weeks as you get closer to the Playoffs get tougher and tougher.

But I feel confident in not only Chase’s ability to manage that pressure, he has a unique approach and personality that can mitigate some of those things. We’ll hear Chase more than likely be hard on himself each time he misses the mark. But when he goes home and he disconnects from the sport, I think he does a really good job of putting himself in places where he can let go and where he can get away from that overbearing pressure.

I also will toss this to Steve, mentioning his crew chief, Alan Gustafson, one of the cleverest, smartest guys that’s on a pit box out there.

I think that Chase couldn’t be in a better position in terms of the people around him, particularly his crew chief, to put him in positions to succeed. I think Steve can speak to that.

STEVE LETARTE: Yeah, I agree with Dale. I think that Alan will understand the task at hand, points versus the win, and he’ll manage that.

I think Alan also is from that wave of crew chiefs where it’s more than just crew chiefing. That’s his race team. Alan is part of this — makes me think of Paul Wolfe or Chad (Knaus) — that generation where that 9 car, Chase Elliott is the most popular driver and he drives it, but I think internally in the garage area, that 9 car is Alan’s team. I think he will set the tone.

I will also say both Alan and Mr. Hendrick I think will do a very good job, while they want that 9 in the Playoffs, Chase is going to have a great career, probably more championships, no doubt many more wins, so they can try to mitigate some of the instant pressure.

He’s not in this situation because of poor performance. It’s just an unfortunate injury that has limited his number of races. That will probably get further in the rearview mirror as you get closer to the Playoffs.

But I believe Alan’s experience, as Dale mentioned, will be vital to putting him in a position to win. But then his friendship, his support away from the racetrack, like Mr. Hendrick, will put in perspective that it’s one year in a long career. I think that perspective will allow that 9 to perform and ultimately, in my opinion, will win and we’ll see them in the Playoffs.

Q. Sam, the last couple years have really been the era of on-field audio in MLB and golf. Any new wrinkles for audio this year in your coverage?

SAM FLOOD: Different than the stick and ball sports, we’ve always had audio in NASCAR, always had access to the drivers and crew chiefs. That access we continue to lean into and take advantage of.

When everyone is on a microphone from the spotters to the crew chiefs to each guy that goes over the wall so they can communicate because it’s so loud at the racetrack, we engage in all that audio.

My favorite things to do on our telecast that we accomplish is listen to the spotters as they take drivers around the track. We’ll do a couple laps of that. It’s been a great element that is really unique to listen to the race as the spotter takes them through. To have Dale Jr. and Jeff Burton translate what that language is, because it’s obviously a shorthand.

We feel that NASCAR is one of those great sports that audio is always available and we’re always leaning into it. Our team is onboard with the onboards.

Q. Steve, last year in August you predicted that Martin Truex Jr. would get back in the Playoffs and have a deep run. Now that he has two wins and the points lead, what are your expectations for the rest of the regular season and the summer?

STEVE LETARTE: I think Martin Truex, as in any major athlete, has gone through a slump, a winless drought, and he persevered, came through the other side. I think we’ve seen one win turn into two very quickly.

As somebody who has had droughts in my own career, it’s easy to start questioning your ability, your decision making, your preparation. It’s human nature. While we do put these drivers on a pedestal of athletes because they deserve to be there, we at times forget that they are still human.

I think Martin is the perfect example of I’d never see a sour attitude, but you definitely saw a diminishing confidence between him and his crew chief and his team as the drought continued.

Now that the drought is over, I don’t know why Martin couldn’t be that multi-time champion that some of us are surprised he isn’t. It’s very quick and easy to forget that he was one or two pit stops from being a two- or a three-time champ. That is sports, that is how things fall at times.

It wouldn’t surprise me, even in the twilight of his career with only I’m sure a few years left, he could easily find his way to the Championship 4 at Phoenix. We’ve seen year in and year out, I think that’s all you can ask for, then you have to hope for a good Sunday in Phoenix to become a champion.

I think there’s definitely a pathway for Martin Truex to get to Phoenix as a championship contender.

Q. Dale Jr. and Dale Jarrett, looking seven weeks down the road here coming back to the Indianapolis Motor Speedway road course. What have you learned about that race, how it shakes out? What is the challenge of that place, considering where it falls leading into the Playoffs?

DALE EARNHARDT JR.: The challenge for that place is getting out of there in one piece. It’s chaotic at the end. Trying to survive any of the late-race restarts, getting down into turn one, that’s a crazy corner where you can get knocked out of the race or lose several spots so easily, get shoved around, beat your car up, hurt the performance of your car. It literally can happen at any restart, but the later restarts just get more and more reckless.

Just trying to get out of there, I think a lot of drivers would win there, but if you can come out of there with a top 10 finish, you got to feel pretty lucky. Even if you’re one of the cars that regularly competes well on the road courses, just to kind of survive there is key.

It’s an incredible facility, one that I think NASCAR is proud to be going to, proud to have Indy represented on the schedule because of its history. It’s a fun race to broadcast as a broadcaster. We get put around there and perched around there doing radio style.

I’ve enjoyed the experiences that I’ve had at that racetrack as a viewer over the last couple years, how entertaining the racing can be, whether we’re on the perch or in the booth. It’s pretty fascinating.

The way the track’s laid out is you can’t really find anywhere to run away and hide. There are so many quirky little turns that the drivers are always within reach of each other. We saw that cause a lot of problems for people late in the race. Drivers get spun around, creates a lot of great controversy, disagreements on pit road that create storylines for us going forward.

DALE JARRETT: As Dale was pointing out there, the big challenge is turn one. The start of the race and then ultimately restarts as the race goes on. We’ve seen so much happen there.

But it’s an opportunity race. You look at it as it winds down, getting to the end of the regular season, you’re going to have so many different drivers with different agendas. You’re going to have an overwhelming group that realizes this might be their one opportunity to win, aside from the regular season ending at Daytona. It is just a chance.

You look at someone like AJ Allmendinger, if he hasn’t won by then, he goes there with the mindset that this is his chance to get his car and his team into the Playoffs. There’s a number of other drivers that are in that same situation.

With the stages being a little different, the way everything is run on the road courses this year, you’re going to see things be done a little bit different I believe in that respect because you’re also going to have drivers that are looking strictly at gathering as many stage points as they possibly can, then others that are looking at trying to get that stage win so that they can get a Playoff point that could be very valuable to them if they’re already into the Playoffs.

So much going on. Difficult, difficult place to race, especially with stockcars. But I think the races we’ve seen there already have been highly entertaining, and I don’t expect anything less this year.

THE MODERATOR: Thank you all so much for joining. That concludes today’s call.

Filed Under: conference call, NASCAR, NBC, transcript, Uncategorized

TRANSCRIPT – 2023 INDIANAPOLIS 500 CONFERENCE CALL

May 22, 2023 By admin

NBC Sports 2023 Indianapolis 500 Conference Call

Monday, May 22, 2023

Mike Tirico

Danica Patrick

Dale Earnhardt Jr.

Leigh Diffey

Townsend Bell

James Hinchcliffe

THE MODERATOR: Thanks, everybody, for joining us today. This will be NBC Sports’ fifth Indianapolis 500. Coverage begins on Sunday, from 9:00 to 11:00 a.m. exclusively on Peacock, and then at 11:00 a.m. NBC and Peacock will have more pre-race coverage before the green flag drops a little later on.

Joining us on our call today is going to be Mike Tirico, Danica Patrick, Dale Earnhardt Jr., Leigh Diffey, Townsend Bell and James Hinchcliffe.

Let’s begin the call now, and we’ll start off with our host, Mike Tirico.

MIKE TIRICO: Good morning, everyone. I’ll be brief. I’ve come to love my Mays at NBC with the Kentucky Derby and the Preakness and then the shift from horses to horsepower and getting to cover the Indy 500.

As someone who lives in Michigan and has spent a quarter of a century in the Midwest, I know what tradition and big events like this mean to the folks who share that part of the country. There’s nothing like the Indy 500. I’ll never forget standing on the grid with Danica and looking forward and backward and seeing people as far as the eye could see. It’s a perspective I never thought I’d get the chance to experience, and now it’s one I crave and look forward to and was reminded of when we were there last year in person.

Dale and Danica have become friends and colleagues over the last couple years. I look forward to the time with them.

I was watching qualifying during the week while I was in Baltimore at the Preakness and then yesterday, and the job that Diff and Hinch and Townsend and the rest of our INDYCAR group does is just so great, and they’re so locked into every story, and it’s great to be able to be around some of the best in the business and share this amazing event.

I look forward to that and any questions anyone might have, but I’ll now hand over to Danica.

DANICA PATRICK: Hello, everybody. Thank you, Mike. So well spoken, as usual.

I’m really excited to be back. I’ve been myself also watching, and so many exciting things happening at Indy this year. Some sad things, obviously, with Graham, but Foyt is having a great year, and with a great run for the pole yesterday, I think there’s just going to be a lot of really great storylines, which is always great.

But I think this crew is just a really good crew, and I thoroughly enjoy working with Mike each and every year. Dale and the play-by-plays, you guys are incredible. Like Mike just said, you guys were so locked in and just did such a great job with everything throughout the weekend.

Just hoping to bring just a little sprinkle of insight here and there and really just get the fans amped up and ready for the weekend.

I was watching yesterday, and my sister texted me and we were texting back and forth about various different things going on, and she just said, it’s so cool, I wish you were still out there because I loved watching you. But she said, there’s just something very special about Indianapolis, and there’s a feeling.

I think that that’s just something kind of undeniable when you become a part of it, whether you’re watching it and you can feel it, but when you’re there you can really feel it.

I just hope I can convey that to the fans that are at home, just the magnitude of the event.

We also said, my sister and I, when you are in the car, obviously it either is one or the other, it’s either calm and easy or terrifying. When you’re watching, it’s all terrifying. I thoroughly enjoyed yesterday.

DALE EARNHARDT JR.: I’m just lucky to be able to come back and enjoy this event. It’s been a really great treat to be there over the last couple of years, and Danica mentioned the atmosphere and environment, and it’s really electric, and there’s a ton of tradition and history, but there’s also this sort of really cool, modern feel to it, especially when you get close to the race cars and the technology, and the passion that the fans of INDYCAR have for their series and this race is endearing.

I feel very fortunate to have the opportunity to be there to experience it and will try my best to convey what I’m seeing and feeling. But I look forward to an awesome weekend, and I know the booth is going to do an amazing job showing everybody how great this race is.

LEIGH DIFFEY: Good morning, everybody. Thanks for your time. The overwhelming feeling is just of excitement because this particular month of May is the first one that has felt like it did pre-pandemic. Just the enthusiasm from the fans and just generally around Indianapolis, that feeling is back, which is really nice, frankly.

The crowd numbers have been up over the weekend. It was very encouraging over the two days. Really good numbers. There’s just a wonderful feeling of positivity in the air.

Yesterday we saw firsthand just the real drama of live sport at either end of the field, with Alex Palou, series champion, winning his first Indy 500 pole, and just what that meant to be the first Spaniard to do that, and at the other end of the field, had one of the most famous names in racing in a Rahal missing out, and talking to Graham this morning, he just said he’s never felt anything like that.

That’s the full impact of this event, the importance, the significance of this event.

Then you can fill in the storylines in between. We’ve been spoiled already. We wish it was tomorrow. We wish it was today. It’s going to be a great week.

To see the unbridled raw passion from Townsend and Hinch in the booth, to know what every one of those drivers was going through over the past two days leading into the Greatest Spectacle in Racing this weekend, you know how real it is, you hear it in their voices, and we’re lucky to have Mike and Danica and Junior back, and we’ve got our family, got our team together for what is now NBC’s fifth Indianapolis 500.

Ready to go, and T-Bell, I know you are, too.

TOWNSEND BELL: Absolutely, thanks, Diff. I think one of the reasons that the crowd was bigger than it’s been in the last 10 years over the weekend is that the fans love to come out not only for the tradition, but for record-setting speeds and drama, and we had all of that over the weekend.

This is the fastest front row in history, the fastest pole speed in history, and the closest front row. I think that’s what made it so exciting is these razor thin margins between first, second, third, and frankly all the way through the field. In fact, this is the fastest field of 33 in history, and that’s what Indy is all about — pushing the limits, how fast can you go, new records set, and it was so exciting to be part of another great qualifying weekend.

Our incredible team at NBC that’s behind the scenes is working to produce 60 hours of live coverage between Peacock and NBC. It’s humbling what they do. Diff and I worked maybe 20 hours Friday, Saturday and Sunday, but certainly not 60 hours, and we’re led by an incredible team, including John Barnes and Rene Hatlelid.

Our statistician, Russ Thompson, who’s up there for every one of those 60 hours, he is attending his 60th Indy 500. A lot of great stats, but it’s all about speed and drama, and we were not disappointed, once again, and I think we’re going to have an incredible Indy 500 Sunday.

James, take it from there.

JAMES HINCHCLIFFE: Thanks, Townsend, and thanks, everybody. Not a lot left to add. Certainly we’ve been spoiled with what we’ve seen on track so far. All the stories have sort of been touched on.

I just want to mimic Townsend’s comments about all the hard work from everybody at NBC. That 60 hours going on over the month is an impressive feat. I know the fans are very appreciative. The tweets that were streaming in as Kevin (Lee) and I were doing practice, just thanking everybody for making the effort to put all the practice sessions online.

It was on the background at work and all that sort of stuff, those stories were really fun to hear, and then obviously, like you said, the drama that we’ve seen so far has been incredible, and I just feel so thankful to get to enjoy this race and this new role.

Getting to do it a handful of times as a driver is obviously super special, and now being able to call my second one with the NBC Sports crew is phenomenal. It’s great to welcome back Mike and Danica and Dale, and I’m excited to share the booth with the two guys that I’ve been doing it with for the last year and call my second Indy 500. Thank you, guys, for the opportunity.

This may be an odd question to start, but I want to ask Townsend, James and Danica. Putting together a story of the best Will Power stories, quirky, weird, funny, and I wonder off the top of your heads if you can recall some of the funny stories that you might have from your times around Will Power.

TOWNSEND BELL: Thanks for the question. I think for me, it really just comes in his unique mannerisms. We joke at his wide and trance-like stares sometimes, both in moments of speed and performance, but also in sort of humor.

When I think of Will Power, I think of those transfixed eyes, certainly when he won his first Indy 500 and just the passion and rage, frankly, at that moment.

But also on a personal note, just anytime I have a conversation, sometimes I’m looking at Will and I feel like I’m speaking a foreign language because I’m not sure if he understands anything I’m saying.

But that’s what makes him special. He’s such a unique character, one of the most talented racing drivers that I have ever had the pleasure of racing against, and if you’ve ever seen some of his performance data and speed traces, especially on places like street circuits, he does things that are seemingly inhuman.

A special guy. He’s a friend, and yeah, I’ll always think of those eyes. I hope that helps.

DANICA PATRICK: The first thing that comes up, and I think I remember showing this video not that long ago to somebody I was talking to, and I don’t remember the premise of it, but basically it was about driving in wet conditions or challenging conditions and how hard it is, and it was about Loudon.

It was my last year in 2011, and watching back the clip, everybody was like, why on earth are we going green? It’s raining out. It went green, and I spun. Like I barely got on the throttle and spun, and everybody started spinning on the front straightaway, but there’s an awesome clip that shows Will Power’s reaction because I’m pretty sure this had a negative effect on the championship. He crashed and he flipped off the stand, like the timing and scoring stand where everybody is at, where Barnhart is at. It was a great view, great picture.

But also, I remember just like from a personality standpoint how also humble he is and how my first win in Japan was also — I think it was his first win, too, and it was in Long Beach — no, it was after Long Beach, and it was all in the same weekend, and I think my friend Hayley asked how he did, and he was like, I won. I remember hearing the story, and he was just so sweet.

So he’s just such a nice guy, but he’s kind of crazy, too.

JAMES HINCHCLIFFE: I’ll jump in on a story that kind of echos a little bit of what Danica said and the humility of a guy that’s had this kind of success. It was my rookie season in 2011, and the race in Brazil, I’m pretty sure he won it, and we were flying out on a Monday, and we were sitting there at the airport and just talking about the race and congratulating him on it, and remember, this is in an era when Will was winning like four to six races a year. It was just sort of assumed that he was going to be winning a handful of races and fighting for the championship.

He looked at me and he said, yeah, man, you know what, you just never know when you’re going to win your last race, so you’ve got to enjoy every one of them. It was like, yeah, but you’re Will Power; you’re going to win a lot more races. He goes, you just don’t know that.

It kind of caught me off guard at the moment. I thought he was just being kind of goofy and stupid, but at the same time, it’s a very true statement, and it just showed the humility of a guy that was absolutely dominating the sport at the time and was still just so thankful for the situation he was in, appreciative of the opportunity that he had been given, and doesn’t take a single day for granted.

It’s so cool to see how after his first championship and then having a couple tough years, questioning his own drive to want to do this again, sort of rediscovered himself, came back and won the championship last year. It’s kind of always stuck with me. He’s a much more philosophical guy than I think a lot of people might think, and as Danica said, the humility there is very impressive for someone that’s got his CV.

Danica, I’m doing a story about women at the Indy 500, and of course there will be a female driver in the field again this year with Katherine Legge, but a cooler story is it’ll be the first time the defending Indy 500 winner has a female team member with Angela Ashmore being part of Marcus Ericsson’s crew last year as the engineer. That’s kind of indicative of how many more women there are across the paddock. Seems like every team has done a lot more hiring, a lot more gender diversity. I know Penske Entertainment and Indianapolis Motor Speedway have talked about more women in their ranks, as well. I don’t know how many races you get to anymore, Danica, but I’m wondering, have you noticed that? Not just maybe in INDYCAR but like across the board in racing. Are you seeing that it’s not just about women drivers that we’re talking about now, but it seems like across the board there’s more gender diversity?

DANICA PATRICK: I guess a little bit. I wasn’t really around Formula 1 a lot until recently, but you definitely see women around the paddock. The Sky Sports team that I’m on, there’s a woman that was part of the strategy for one of the teams that is now doing the broadcast stuff. You see a little bit more of that, and obviously Naomi (Schiff) is part of that broadcast.

In NASCAR, sprinkled in here and there. I can’t say that it seems like a dramatic change.

But INDYCAR I think in particular has probably had the most amount of women filling positions in everything from obviously driver, which I think at its highest, and you can correct me if I’m wrong, it was five of us at one time at the 500. It might have been somewhere around 2009 or 2010-ish. So there’s been many drivers at one point in time, but then there’s also female owners, women on the crew, putting together predominantly female teams.

I think INDYCAR takes the trophy for the series, top-level series, that has been putting the most into giving women their opportunity.

I guess I can say that that felt the same for me. I feel like my time in INDYCAR felt like I got a really great shake at it, and I drove for great teams. But it’s kind of like a stock market; it goes up, it goes down, it goes up, it goes down, and it trajectory-wise tends to be going in an upward fashion, but there will always be these lulls. We can go from five women in the field to none, or one this year, but the fact that it’s more normal is still an uptick from where it used to be.

That is exactly the angle I’m doing is obviously there were no women drivers last year, and as you said, there had been five at one point. But it seems like across the board there’s more than ever in the paddock. I know when you grow and have success that it was about performance, it was about your results, that everything else is sort of a byproduct of that. But a lot of people I talk to point to you as being a big part of this, the if-you-see-it-you-can-be-it sort of thing has filtered its way through. Do you have any thoughts on that? Do you ever think about that? Do you think about the impact you had there?

DANICA PATRICK: Well, I’m super flattered by that. I think by not thinking about myself as a girl or using women as a benchmark for anything, it’s probably what gave me my level of success.

But in all of history, in all aspects of life, there will always be the four-minute mile people. There will always be people that do things for the first time, and people need to see it, and then it enters the collective or the zeitgeist, and then all of a sudden you see more of it right away.

Whatever level of contribution I had to that, I’m honored. I was not the first woman to come along but the first to do a few things.

Happy and proud to have my part in history.

I had a couple for the booth with James, Townsend and Leigh. From what you guys have seen on track so far this month, especially in qualifying, how do you see the flow of the race will be, similar or different from years past?

JAMES HINCHCLIFFE: I think certainly with the added downforce options that INDYCAR brought to the speedway this year, we’re in for a good race. We saw this trend in Texas where we’ve had some difficult races the last few seasons, we showed up with some added downforce and it really did help the cause. From what we’ve seen in practice, I think cars can definitely follow a lot closer. Even though it’s still not easy to pass, I think we’ve made that window a little bit wider and opened up the opportunities a little bit further down the line.

From everything we’ve seen, how close it is and how fast it is and now how close they can race, I think we’re going to see a very similar sort of race to the first half of last year and then hopefully one just as exciting at the end.

TOWNSEND BELL: Yeah, I agree with James. I think it’s going to be fiercely competitive, mainly because there are some teams on the rise in the field — Danica talked about AJ Foyt Racing. Absolutely incredible performance in qualifying. But that performance starts with preparation and a commitment to excellence that frankly goes back to probably October of last year when the teams really set the course for their off-season development, specifically to perform well at Indianapolis.

You’ve got two AJ Foyt cars that look incredibly fast that frankly would not have been in the picture in terms of expectations even a month ago, and then you add in Arrow McLaren that have come with a four-car team, also crazy fast race cars, on top of the establishment, Penske, of course, Ganassi, the Andretti teams.

Then you’ve got smaller programs. Just like at Dreyer Reinbold Racing with two cars that easily qualified, or Juncos Hollinger Racing that comfortably made the show, not without a little bit of drama.

You pack that all in, the flow of the race is oftentimes really determined in that first stint. Does it go green for 40 or 50 laps to start this race, or is there kind of high drama and big aggression at the start that puts us into a cadence of maybe more yellows than we’ve seen in the past.

I tend to think we’re going to be more in that dramatic first stint where there’s going to be some contested moments at the end of these long straightaways at the speedway, Turn 1 and Turn 3, maybe even on the start, principally because you’ve got so much high expectation coming from the middle of the pack with two Penske drivers, Newgarden and McLaughlin, starting further back, Ed Carpenter and Will Power, who we already talked about. These are cars and drivers expecting to be at the front and to be there early, so I’ll be watching big moves at the start and see what the resulting drama looks like.

LEIGH DIFFEY: I think the other thing we keep into consideration, too, is this has been an eventless practice and qualifying period. There has been no major incidents, yet there’s been some engine issues and there’s been some brushes of the wall, but there hasn’t been that one moment, which is quite rare to go through a month of May and not see it like this. So is this the saucepan with hot water in it that’s about to bubble and tip the saucepan lid off? Like is that amount of pent-up energy, is that going to be released here somewhere?

I think adding to what Townsend and Hinch said, don’t forget about Team Penske. They don’t enjoy what’s happened in qualifying and not being in the limelight, so they’re going to be ready come race time, as well.

Danica, given that you know the Rahal team extremely well, they’ve had a difficult time yesterday with Graham, obviously, how do you think they go from what happened yesterday to preparing for the biggest race of the year?

DANICA PATRICK: Yeah, that was heartbreaking. I watched that just with my fists together going like, oh, I just know the pain. I have been there before with rain conditions and various different things, and also just having so much empathy for Graham, to be the driver that he is and then to not be in it. I texted him and just said, everybody knows your talent, and this just happens.

I said that the speedway shows no mercy. There was a point in time when Penske didn’t make the field.

It’s just one of those places that when it’s not there, it’s not there. He had so much poise. I didn’t hear Bobby (Rahal) talk at all. I’m not sure if he did. But Graham had so much poise, but yet so authentic, and I think he handled it incredibly well.

There’s a very common saying, what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger, so I’m sure that that will be the case. But Bobby and his team have been extremely successful, as I’ve been a part of some of that, so I’m sure that this will give them the kick in the butt to figure it out, as I’m pretty sure they have some very talented engineers on the team right now.

But at this point in time, all you can do is buckle down and try and fill your head with the most positive things you can and get a good race car that gives you confidence. That’s the best thing they can do for their drivers at this point in time is to get a car that’s steady in traffic and comfortable, and that usually goes a long way on Sunday.

Mike and Dale and Leigh, as guys that cover a number of big events outside of motorsports and INDYCAR, how do you put the scope of the Indy 500 into context, and is there a first memory you have or a “holy cow” kind of moment in terms of when that struck you, being at a big event like the 500?

DALE EARNHARDT JR.: I came from growing up around NASCAR races and thinking that the Daytona 500 was the greatest thing and the biggest thing going, and while I’m very proud of that, when I walked out through Gasoline Alley on race day for my first Indy 500 and saw — I know that the race cars are out on the front straightaway but you couldn’t see any of that because of the people.

There’s just the enormity of the size of the crowd, the interest of so many people, like-minded people in one place at one time, it was just incredible.

Standing down there with the cars on the grid and everybody going through the traditional processes of the pre-race leading right up to the moment the drivers kind of shoo everybody away from the cars and the drivers get in, I had seen nothing like that. I had never been around anything like that in motorsports.

I think being in a pace car leading the field, it looked like jet fighters floating right across the top of the racetrack. There’s this really odd, incredible energy that comes from specifically before the start of the race from the field of cars. There’s so much preparation that goes into getting to this moment, and here they are getting ready to be turned loose for the very first start of the race, and there’s this anticipation, excitement. There’s this hope that things are going to prevail individually. All of that sort of radiating off of the field and they’re pacing around that racetrack.

When you get that close to it, if you ever have a chance to ride in a pace car or anything like that before a race of that magnitude, that’s where you’ll feel it.

That’s two moments right there, I think, that I’ll never experience again anywhere else, and there’s countless others as you move around the racetrack throughout the day.

LEIGH DIFFEY: I always think about large events, and NBC Sports being the home of the Olympics here in the States, we get to go to different countries and different venues, and it moves around, and then you have all of the respective sports and different venues. It’s not one concentrated point at any one time.

Then you have the football World Cup which changes venues, and then you have your different sports, different iconic events like the Super Bowl or the AFL Grand Final or this past weekend with the Premier League with the title being decided, never in the same spot at the one time; it always moves around.

But this is such a concentrated tradition that you get sucked in by the passion and the history and the ritual and the respect that the people have for the ritual. It’s just so addictive, and it drags you in.

Then you never forget the first time that you stood in a corner and watch an INDYCAR take one of the four turns at speed, and you don’t know whether to giggle or to be afraid. You’re excited. You are blown away. You’re amazed. It’s a feeling that never leaves you. There is nothing — it doesn’t matter what anybody says — there is nothing like this event on the planet.

You may go to an event that has 65,000 people in a stadium, or you may be lucky enough to see 100,000 people in a stadium, but to be at a sporting event where cars are going over 200 miles an hour and there are more than 300,000 people in one spot at one time, it’s not hyperbole; there’s nothing like it in the world.

MIKE TIRICO: I’ll add two quick anecdotes. I mentioned the one at the beginning of the call. My first time with Danica at Indy before the race got started when we were all sitting on a set right before we entered Turn 1, I couldn’t believe we were there and I couldn’t believe looking in either direction how many people there were, and there were people as far as you could see.

The big-sport perspective is I’ve been lucky enough to be on the field, helping hand out the trophy at the Super Bowl a few times, and host the opening ceremony for the Olympics and call football games regularly in stadiums that have 70,000 or even in my college football days, the Michigan stadium has 110,000 people, and this is three times that. That gives you just a sense of the scale.

What I love about how large it is is how personal and individual it is, as well, because when we had the pandemic year, that place was so eerie, so silent, yet all you heard from folks were, well, I’ve been to 43 in a row, and I don’t want my streak to end. It’s a very personal connection with the community that I think no sporting event has.

For something this large to go house to house there in Speedway and in Carmel and all the places in Indiana really resonates with me.

The last thing I’ll tell you is Dale Jr. and Danica have been in high-pressure, high-speed situations, and they’re cool about all this stuff, and I get to sit on the pit box with them and watch the race.

Last year, I think there was a restart maybe with 25 (laps) to go. I think that was the restart. The two of them took out their cameras and they’re taking a picture of the restart as it’s coming. They’re filming it or taking a still picture. I don’t know which one. I’ve got a picture of the two of them taking a picture, and I thought, this is the damned coolest thing; these two have done this at the highest level, but they are caught up in what this is all about, and it’s the scene and it’s the cars and it’s the moments that only Indy delivers, and that resonates with me still to this day, that even those who have been behind the wheel and in these moments like this still think it’s cool.

That says to me how powerful the experience of Indy and the 500 together truly is.

James, Graham was bumped from the race late in the session yesterday, kind of similar to the devastating fashion you were bumped in 2018. Can you relate to what Graham went through, and did you have any advice for him yesterday?

JAMES HINCHCLIFFE: I can certainly relate. I saw him last night afterwards, and basically went up and gave him a big hug and said, hey, man, I get it.

It really is one of the worst feelings on earth as a driver, sitting there in that car watching Jack’s run, and I’m sure when Jack left the pits, he felt not necessarily confident, but I think like most of us, we were pretty skeptical that they were going to be able to go out immediately after a run and go faster.

Then as those laps started clicking off quicker and quicker, I’m sure he felt like the entire world was caving in, and that already small tight cockpit felt even smaller and tighter.

But as was already mentioned, the way that he handled it, in fact the way both drivers handled it was incredibly impressive, two very class acts there.

But I told him straight up, I said there’s no words of wisdom here. I don’t really have anything for you that’s going to make you feel better because nothing is going to make you feel better, but just know that it’s just a phase. Today is going to be one of the worst days of your career, but tomorrow is going to be a little bit better and then a little bit better the day after that, and eventually this will just be a story you tell to your kids.

But I certainly can feel for him and the anguish that he’s got going on right now.

For the drivers, Danica, Townsend and James, looking back on your careers at the Indy 500, what was that “welcome to the Indy 500” moment, whether it was good, bad or anything in between?

DANICA PATRICK: I suppose the ones that stick out the most from each would be, for me, it all felt very good, for Indy especially, showing up to rookie orientation. I had never worn nail polish, but for some reason, I think it was because it was so early in the month and I was flying there from Arizona where I lived, and that was the very beginning of the month, that was when we had a whole month there, and I had pink nail polish on, and there’s like one of my favorite photos other than right after the race in 2005 hugging my dad. There’s a picture of me putting my Hans device on with my pink nail polish, and I just have just such fond memories of that first time at the track and rookie orientation and pulling into the pits every single time after I made a run and there being just 10 or 20 photographers right in front of the car.

It was just, welcome to Indy. It was like, this is a big deal, and you felt like it was.

Then the one that sticks out from Daytona is my first full season in the Cup car to qualify on the front row and have photos of me starting on the pole with the outside front row being Jeff Gordon, which was – sorry, Dale – my favorite driver when I was young.

I have a picture from when I raced at Charlotte Motor Speedway on the go-kart track on the inside with my sister and my dad at the race shop standing in front of the Rainbow Warrior car. That was one of those two where I’m like, wow, this is real life. This is so cool.

TOWNSEND BELL: I think one of the lasting memories from my first Indy 500 was strapping my helmet on as I stood next to my race car about to climb in for my first 500 in 2006 and for whatever reason, glancing up into the grandstands at the approximate location of where I sat 20 years prior, exactly 20 years prior as an 11-year-old boy watching my first Indy 500 in 1986 and realizing the achievement of just being there.

It was surreal. Some of you might know my story; I didn’t have two nickels to rub together when I decided to drop out of college and pursue becoming a racing driver, and it just was an enormously powerful realization of that journey, and I’ll always remember that, how special it was to be on the other side of the fence, and to almost see that 11-year-old boy in the grandstands was powerful.

JAMES HINCHCLIFFE: For me, it’s interesting. Mine is a little different, I think, because when you come here as a rookie, everything is overwhelming. You’re just so floored that you’re really here and you’re really doing it, and you go through all the things that you go through in May for the first time and you go through qualifying and you go through the parade on Saturday, then you have driver intros, then you do the whole ceremony at the start with the anthem and “Taps” and “Back Home Again” and all those things, and they’re all so special.

You just sort of are kind of wide-eyed and trying to take it all in.

But for me, the real weight of the Indy 500 and the true meaning of it really hit me was when I crashed out of the race about half distance. I crashed out, and I had gone out of races before in INDYCAR and lots of times in your career as a kid, whatever. I’ve never had a feeling like that.

It felt so much worse, and you were almost like pleading with some higher power to just hit the reset button and go back 30 seconds so you could do something different and make a different decision. In that moment I just felt a way for all of my team and my sponsors and my family and just everybody that I had never felt with any other kind of DNF or anything like that or any kind of mistake.

I think that’s the moment that it really struck me. It was when it all sort of disappeared, all got taken away in that moment, and it was very powerful. I never forgot that.

THE MODERATOR: Thanks for participating and for joining today. There will be a transcript of this call available in a few hours on NBCSportsGrouppressbox.com or by contacting one of us in the communications department. Our coverage begins on Sunday, 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. exclusively on Peacock and then 11:00 a.m. on Peacock and NBC. Thanks, everybody.

Filed Under: Indy 500, IndyCar, NBC, transcript, Uncategorized

TRANSCRIPT – NBC SPORTS KENTUCKY DERBY MEDIA CONFERENCE CALL

May 2, 2023 By admin

Tuesday, May 2, 2023

THE MODERATOR: Good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to today’s NBC Sports Kentucky Derby conference call. This Saturday, May 6th, at Noon Eastern, we’ll present 7.5 hours of live Kentucky Derby coverage on NBC and Peacock, which marks the most hours ever on broadcast TV for a horse racing event.

On today’s call, we’re joined by Lindsay Schanzer, our senior producer of horse racing on the Kentucky Derby; Mike Tirico, our Kentucky Derby host; analyst Jerry Bailey, a two-time Derby winner, who won his first 30 years ago on Sea Hero; analyst Randy Moss, covering his 43rd Derby; handicapper Eddie Olczyk; our insights analyst from NBC News, Steve Kornacki; and our race caller, Larry Collmus.

With that, I’ll turn it over to Lindsay Schanzer.

LINDSAY SCHANZER: Hi, everyone. Welcome to the 149th Kentucky Derby. We appreciate you joining us.

This is my 11th year working on the Kentucky Derby production for NBC. Thrilled to be in my second year producing. Once again, I’m lucky to be working with the best announce team out there. I wanted to give you a sense of how we line up for this year.

Mike Tirico, who you’ll hear from, is back to host for us. Ahmed Fareed will host the other part of the broadcast, as well as serving as a reporter throughout the coverage. Randy Moss and Jerry Bailey, who are here as well, are our analysts. Reporters Kenny Rice, Britney Eurton, and Nick Luck will roam around the grounds. Donna Brothers on horseback. Handicappers Eddie Olczyk and Matt Bernier join us this year. Steve Kornacki is back as our insights analyst.

Matthew Berry will join the Kentucky Derby for his first time, very excited. Rebecca Lowe is back. Dale Earnhardt as well rejoins us. He’s going to explore a lot of strategy and different elements around the racetrack to pique his curiosity. Dylan Dreyer returns. She’s joining us with Sanya Richards-Ross to cover all things fashion and red carpet. And Larry Collmus, our race announcer, who again is on this call.

Just a couple notes from me: We’re one year removed from what I consider the absolute thrill of Rich Strike becoming the second longest shot in the history of the Derby to wear the roses. After a string of unpredictable Derby days, we know full well that anything can happen on the first Saturday in May. I think I speak for everyone when I say we can’t wait to find out what this year has in store.

We’ve got a really special show planned with some great elements to look forward to. I want to give you a couple of highlights. One that I’m pretty excited about – Jerry will tell you more – but Dale Earnhardt Jr. welcomed Jerry Bailey to his house last week to talk strategy, racing strategy between the jockey and the race car driver. They had a ton to talk about. We’re going to show you a little bit of that.

We’ve got a feature on an undercard horse this year, Cody’s Wish, and a really special story between that horse and his namesake, Cody Dorman.

A special recognition of the 50th anniversary of Secretariat’s Triple Crown win. Tune in, you won’t want to miss that one.

And a couple of Derby related stories, just the highlights. We spent Sunday night dinner with Mike Repole and his family. Mike Repole owns the likely favorite Forte. And spent some time with Brad Cox, Louisville born trainer, the first Louisville born trainer to win the Kentucky Derby, although he did so following a disqualification and never really got his moment in the winner’s circle. So we spent some time chatting with him.

I mentioned Matthew Berry is here for the first time. He had a lot to learn about betting horses, and he took a lighthearted approach to teaching the audience how to bet the horses for his first Derby. We hope that will make you smile and learn a little bit.

In addition to covering fashion, we will have extended red carpet coverage throughout the broadcast, with 7.5 hours starting at Noon ET on NBC and Peacock. We really are in the swing of things when the red carpet is getting going between Noon and 2 p.m. ET. Lots of coverage from down there.

Incredible stories as always making up this field of 20. We can’t wait to bring it all to you. I’ll send it over to Mike Tirico to tell you what he’s excited about.

MIKE TIRICO: Hi, Lindsay. I’ll be brief so we can save our time for questions with everyone. We have a great team. It’s a pleasure and an honor to work with the entire group of men and women who Lindsay just listed who are on the broadcast. We have a great leader as well. Lindsay producing last year’s Derby led us to be ready for an unbelievable all-time sports memory with Rich Strike making that late comeback.

I’m proud of our whole team. The Kentucky Derby from last year was honored by our peers with an Emmy nomination for Outstanding Live Special with things like the Winter Olympics, the World Cup Final, the Super Bowl, and the World Series. It speaks to the great stories the Derby gives, our great team, and Lindsay’s leadership as well.

I get to cover a bunch of great events, and this is one of my favorites because it’s one of the most unique challenges in sports. We’re talking for the seven hours; everyone from the hard-core horse player, the handicappers, to the people who wait and watch just one horse race a year. It all kind of comes together with interesting celebrities around it.

Everything from the E! Red Carpet show to the Today Show to other great horse racing shows. I love sitting next to Randy and Jerry and picking their brains and making folks money and making them smile along the way.

With that, I turn it over to the best race caller in the business in Larry Collmus.

LARRY COLLMUS: Thank you very much, Mike. I’m just a few minutes away from boarding my flight to Louisville. Excited to be with you all this afternoon.

This will be Derby number 13 for me. It’s hard to believe it’s been that many years. It was 10 years ago that it was Orb in the mud making that big play outside. I gave him that big call, “Orb!” and I was hoping it was really him because the track was that muddy.

It proves you have to be ready for everything calling this horse race. It is 20 horses. It’s the most important horse race in the country. There’s so much going on. You never know what you’re going to see, and we saw that last year with Rich Strike coming up from the inside. I was just so happy I was able to pick him up in time because that was quite a late move that he made with Sonny Leon.

It is just an absolute thrill to be back with this great crew and calling the Kentucky Derby for the 13th time. Can’t wait to get to Louisville and can’t wait to do it. We’ll have so many different races over the two days. A whole lot going on.

With that, we’ll send it over to our man, Jerry Bailey.

JERRY BAILEY: Thanks, Larry. Look, we were counting up the amount of Derbies we’d all been here, and I guess it was 34 for me. I thought I’d seen just about everything, but the last four years really proved me wrong.

In 2019, we had a horse disqualified for interference during the running of the race, first ever from the 21 position. The next year we had a Derby on the first Saturday in September instead of the first Saturday in May. In ’21, we had a horse disqualified for a medication violation, which took months to adjudicate, if not more than that.

Then last year we had a horse that won the Kentucky Derby that 24 hours prior wasn’t even in the body of the race at 80-to-1, as Mike mentioned.

So a lot of strange things can happen. You won’t see it unless you tune in. As Lindsay mentioned, I had the opportunity to spend some time with Dale Earnhardt, which could mean a lot of cool things as we contrast and compare auto and horse racing. So you don’t want to miss that.

Randy, what are your thoughts, Buddy?

RANDY MOSS: Jerry and I have been sitting next to each other on TV sets, this is our 18th year, and we’re always looking for little things that we can do different from one year to the next, little edges in our preparation, something different that we can do to make it better. We pride ourselves on talking to all the connections in the Derby and making sure we’ve got all the little story lines.

You can watch all the races, you can read all you can read about these horses, but there’s really no substitute for talking to them in person and maybe flushing out any little nuggets that they might have that other people don’t really know about.

This year it’s pretty easy to know what we could do better from what we did last year because, when Rich Strike crossed the finish line — as you guys have pointed out, he didn’t get into the race until Friday. A horse named Ethereal Road scratched, and that enabled Rich Strike to draw in from the also eligibles. I didn’t have trainer Eric Reed’s phone number. Jerry didn’t have his phone number. We never had to talk to him before.

We watched the horse’s races and everything. It was Oaks Day. We were preparing for our telecast. Do we really need to talk to Eric Reed and find his phone number? No. This horse has no chance, he’s 80-to-1, 100-to-1, he’s not going to win. So we’ll cut that corner and won’t have to worry about talking to people about Rich Strike.

So what happens? Now no matter what happens, no matter who draws in, no matter what the price is on every horse, we’re going to make sure we talk to the connections face to face or on the phone. I think we were fine. We had enough about Rich Strike. It was a historic upset. But it would have been nice to have actually talked to the people before the running of the race. From now on, we will.

EDDIE OLCZYK: Hello, everybody. This is an unbelievable time of year, and it’s always great to be back on this team with this incredible leadership of Lindsay and our entire talent team in front of the camera, but also the incredible men and women behind the scenes that put on this event. It is a long time in the making, and I can’t wait to see everybody and give them a hug and say hello and tell stories.

As I get a little bit older, it takes maybe a little bit longer to tell the same stories over and over again, but it is great to see the people. That’s what I love the most about our team. Looking forward to be with Matt Bernier again, as we have at the Breeders’ Cup the last handful of years. This will be his first at the Kentucky Derby with our coverage on NBC.

So I’m looking forward to working with a talented young handicapper, a real solid guy, a big Boston Bruins fan, unfortunately, like our boss, Sam Flood. They took it on the chin. Sometimes not only in horse racing, but in hockey, long shots win and the favorites don’t, and that’s what makes horse racing so well.

To be with Steve again and with Matthew Berry, so trying to get people an opportunity to get their feet wet. Certainly I know that I will be wearing out a walkway to the window.

As far as the Kentucky Derby, I think — and I have not spoken to Randy or Jerry about this. I’m looking forward to doing that. I think I can make a case right now for five to six horses and sit there and have a lot of confidence that any of the six that I would pick, that they would have a chance to win. I think it is that wide open.

So as a handicapper in prepping everybody for Saturday and the big race, look, you can go in a lot of different directions. I don’t think people would look at you and say, ‘no, that horse has got no shot,’ as Randy just alluded to with Rich Strike last year. That’s what makes it so exciting this year.

Forte certainly looks like he’s the real deal, and you can’t argue that he will be the favorite, but you’ve got to run the race. And as we always love to say, the handicapper and us watching and us working know the horse’s odds. The horses, the equine athletes have no idea what their odds are, and they’re going to run the race.

So if they happen to be 7-to-2 or 81-to-1, they’re going to do what they do and what they love to do. So I just can’t wait to get to Louisville and see everyone.

Hopefully I’m passing the racing form to the right guy…Steve Kornacki.

STEVE KORNACKI: Thanks, Eddie.

Yeah, I would just echo what everybody’s been saying on the call. This is the third year I’ve been lucky enough to be part of the coverage, to spend time with this team, to be part of this team. It’s a great honor to me. They’re great people. They’re incredible professionals.

I know the quality as a viewer because I was a viewer before I was a part of this telecast the last few years, and the quality, I think, of the production is just outstanding.

This is an event that my first Kentucky Derby that I watched when I was a kid, 1987, Alysheba, been hooked on the Derby, been hooked on the sport ever since. It’s sort of a pinch yourself moment whenever I get to come to a Churchill Downs and be part of this coverage.

A lot of interesting storylines, obviously, this year to be focusing on. You heard Rich Strike mentioned five or six times already on this call. I think the memory of Rich Strike is going to hover over this race in so many different ways. One that I’ll be focusing on, I know certainly during the telecast, is the big question is whether there’s going to be a Rich Strike effect in the betting, just in terms of the odds.

You saw the morning line come out yesterday. I think four horses were at 50-to-1. You got a favorite in Forte at 3-to-1. I thought it was really interesting to go back and look at last time I think you had a Rich Strike-like upset in the Kentucky Derby. To me that’s when you go back to 2009 and Mine That Bird coming out of absolutely nowhere and winning the race. If you take a look at 2010, the immediate next year, there was a dramatic Mine That Bird effect in the betting.

No horse went off in 2010 at odds that were longer than 30-to-1. There were four horses in 2010 who were 50-to-1 on the morning line. Not a single one ended up more than 30-to-1. The favorite went off at 6-to-1. So the betting was very different in 2010 versus 2009, the money was much more evenly spread out.

I think, if we see something like that, that’s one of the things we’re looking for. If we see something like that this year, that could create unexpected value among some of the better horses in that race, maybe some of the six that Eddie has in mind.

Might have been a lower price a year ago. They might be a bit of a higher price this year with so much money going to some of the very long shot horses because a lot of people are going to look at this race, remember Rich Strike, and maybe say why not when they look at one of these impossible looking horses.

Q: Hi, guys. This is for Randy, Jerry, and Eddie, and even Steve as well. Forte seems to be a bit of a lukewarm favorite given his record. Can you explain why and your thoughts on his chances as his morning line perhaps drifts up among the lines? Based on what Steve said about Rich Strike.

RANDY MOSS: I’ll give you my opinion. I think it has everything to do with the way he won the Florida Derby. He won the Fountain of Youth, and he was just visually dynamic. The Florida Derby was much more workmanlike. He looked like he was beaten at the quarter pole and even at the eighth pole, when Mage ran by him around the turn.

He did pull it out at the end and won it by daylight, but the final time wasn’t, by a speed figure perspective, didn’t blow anybody away visually. The win didn’t blow anybody away. I think that’s why he’s more of a lukewarm favorite now than his record might indicate he should be.

EDDIE OLCZYK: I would just say to me he’s a ‘trier.’ Like from a handicapping point of view and the visual, he just — it looks like the will and the want to is there, and it just — I don’t know if the right word is workmanlike or just a grinding type style because it looked like — I don’t know what Randy and Jerry think, but in that Florida Derby, it looked like it took him a while to get going again. It just looked like, ‘oh, okay, now I’ve got to get going.’

But once he kind of got on the outside, he just looked like, ‘okay, I know what I’ve got to do. I know where the wire is.’ And then it looked like, once he got to Mage, he was taking 2.5, 3 strides to Mage’s one. Mage made the big early move there because he got off a little rough. I just think the style, he’s not going to be denied.

We heard Lindsay mention Mike Repole, and of course that horse is co-owned by Vinnie and Teresa Viola of St. Elias Stable, and seeing Vinnie talk about that horse after the Florida Derby, the horse is not going to be denied. I think there’s something for that.

Adversity is a really important part of the Kentucky Derby, and you’ve got to be able to maneuver and stick handle your way through. If we have 20 starters, you’ve got to find your way through 19 other equine athletes. He just seems to be, does he want to get to the wire? I think there’s something for that. That has a lot to do with the success, and obviously being the morning line favorite.

Q: Question for Jerry and Randy. How do you rate the overall talent of this field? What’s your kind of favorite contenders in that next group that’s right behind him?

JERRY BAILEY: This is Jerry. I don’t know — every year it’s the same thing. I don’t know how we rate them until later on in the year, but at this point on paper, a lot of them look pretty even. I’d say they’re an above-average group.

I would go with the number five or six. That’s the number that Randy and I have landed on, of horses that if things go their way in the race, they could win, and it wouldn’t surprise us even a little bit.

Behind Forte, you have Verifying, you have Tapit Trice, you have Derma Sotogake. I’ll let Randy talk about him. He’s the Derma Sotogake fan. Angel of Empire. There is a clump of horses that, if anything goes really right for them, they could probably win.

RANDY MOSS: That’s probably the big five that Jerry and I – five or six. Forte, Tapit Trice, Derma Sotogake, Verifying, Angel of Empire.

JERRY BAILEY: Practical Move was on my list until Santa Anita. He won, but I thought he would run better than that in the Santa Anita Derby. That kind of performance, I don’t think, wins the Kentucky Derby. He’d have to improve on that.

RANDY MOSS: Bottom line, would we be surprised if Practical Move won? No. Would we be surprised if Skinner won? No. Would we be surprised if Two Phil’s won? He ran a fast race on synthetic, if he transfers that to dirt.

There are quite a few contenders in here, you may not have them in your top five, but if the race is won and one of them wins, you certainly wouldn’t be shocked at the outcome.

Q: This one’s for Lindsay. Lindsay, I know you’ve been part of horse racing and the coverage for other horse racing events for a while, but last year was your first as the senior producer. Do you have any lessons learned or any kind of advice from your first debut last year?

LINDSAY SCHANZER: I learned a lot last year as I have on every broadcast I’ve produced. I’ve been through the ringer, I think, in my experience. I’m sitting here with Jerry and Randy, who are giggling at me. Through the ringer in my experience producing horse races, and last year was no exception.

It’s really just a matter of being prepared for anything and recognizing that we’ll sit here all week and the months leading up to it and talk about horses and possible outcomes and stories and this and that, and at the end of the day, the horse that got in 24 hours prior to the race could cross the wire first and shock you all.

So whether it’s weather or such as something happening on race day, timing goes off, a long shot comes in. You hear something from an interview that you didn’t expect, whatever it is. It’s really just being flexible and light on your feet and react to what happens.

And embrace the moment. That’s the other thing. Last year really reminded me there are great things that happen in this sport. It’s been around for almost 150 years, and there are exciting, unforgettable moments, just like last year, and make sure you celebrate what that means in the history of this event and this sport. We were lucky to experience what we did last year, and hopefully we gave audiences the best seat in the house and the most thorough coverage of it.

I’m looking forward to whatever happens this year.

Q: Lindsay, one quick follow up, if I may. From a tech side, I saw a cinematic camera will be used. What do you think it will be used for, and what do you think it will add to the broadcast?

LINDSAY SCHANZER: We’re trying it out this year. I think for the most part we’re going to focus on the events outside the racing side of things. We’re going to get a shot on the races as well, but for the most part, we’re looking for it to cover the flavor, the fashion, all of the color in and around Churchill Downs and what makes this one of the greatest events in American sports.

We’ll see that throughout the coverage. Celebrities, what they’re wearing, what they’re drinking, what they’re eating, all the people around, the hats they’re wearing. We’re expecting to pepper it throughout the broadcast to really give you the flavor of this event.

Q: Last year the aerial replay drew so many views on social media, the view from the Winged Vision Cessna that was 2,500 feet in the sky and got this great view. From a technology standpoint, can you lean on that again this year if need be? Have there been any advances as far as doing the aerial stuff technology-wise?

LINDSAY SCHANZER: Absolutely we’ll lean into it. From an advancement standpoint, not specifically. The technology honestly is great. It works really well. We haven’t used it too much in the past, in part because we haven’t had a setup as exciting as Rich Strike to show how he came all the way through the pack and weaved in and out of horses through the stretch.

But to your point, we know that people really paid attention to it and liked it. I think one of the things I’m thinking about going into this broadcast is spend a little bit more time up in the air on race replays as it is. It’s a different look. People aren’t used to it. It really shows the perspective of the field and how moves are made.

Even if it’s not a move being made in between horses, the separation from a horse that wins by a lot. I’m hoping you can expect to see a lot more aerial coverage within this year’s show. And we do have the iso track system back in case we get another exciting weave like Rich Strike.

Q: Can you talk about the technology and anything that’s advanced in that or anything you’ve been told regarding that? The ability to zoom in is incredible. I’m just curious what you know about it.

LINDSAY SCHANZER: We’ve got great pilots up in the air who will be flying that Winged Vision plane, and we’ll track horses along the way. As fast as we can get it to you, we’ll turn it around.

We also have drone coverage. Per restrictions, they don’t fly directly over the horses. It’s not that same perspective. The aerial perspective from the Rich Strike viral clip was the aerial camera as opposed to drone coverage.

We’ll continue utilizing that. I’m not sure about advancements beyond that specifically at this point, but we’re pretty happy with the coverage that we have.

Q: This question is for Steve Kornacki. Steve, you have such a deep following on the news and your big boards. How much do you enjoy now being integrated into the sports department?

STEVE KORNACKI: It’s tough to put into words. I love it. I feel incredibly lucky, incredibly fortunate. The NBC Sports people have been unbelievably generous and welcoming to me. Their eagerness to include me means a ton to me.

I think, like I said, the sports opportunities I’ve had, particularly when it comes to the Derby itself and horse racing in general, I feel particularly lucky because I’m just such a big fan. It’s something, really going back to when I was a kid. This is a sport I followed really closely.

Even before I was doing Derby and horse racing coverage for NBC, I would spend – this is how I would spend my weekends, watching the races and me and my uncle having a phone call in the morning deciding which track we were going to play and kind of figuring out our strategy for the day. It’s something I’ve always just enjoyed the sport tremendously.

When I got to cover this in 2021 for the first time, it was the first time I actually got to go to the Derby in person. Just being there and getting the environment – ’21 was the first post-COVID year, so I think it was probably half capacity, but it felt pretty full to me. Just an incredible experience.

Like I said, whether it’s on horse racing or Sunday Night Football, the folks both on air and off I’ve gotten a chance to work with, sometimes I’ll look up and watching these races and watching the recaps, and I’ll realize, ‘geez, I’m getting to be in the same room as Jerry Bailey.’ There’s somebody who I’ve watched this guy ride. I remember so many of his races.

I’m getting to hear him maybe off the air even just give his unfiltered thoughts, and I find that is kind of a thrill for me.

Q: This can be for – I guess it can be for anybody who can answer it. I think that it was touched upon a little bit earlier, the long shots in recent years. Do you chalk it up to a statistical anomaly? Is it just a random chance that eventually this would happen? Or the field perhaps getting a little tighter than maybe 10, 20 years ago? I guess whoever wants to answer that, whether it’s Steve or Mike or anybody else that wants to jump in.

STEVE KORNACKI: I could say something just real quickly. I think it’s interesting what you’re asking about because, yes, obviously we had a huge price last year. The payout in ’21 with Medina Spirit was pretty big. If there had been a payout on Mandaloun, who ultimately was declared the winner months later, that would have been even larger. You had Country House via the disqualification in 2019 at 65-to-1.

There have been some monster payouts and monster upsets the last few years. But there’s also the simultaneous trend, which is something we’ll touch on in the broadcast, during the points era, the points qualifying era for the Derby which started in 2013, the favorites have been doing fairly well. You had that stretch from 2013 to 2018 of six straight favorites winning. I think nine of the 10 favorites in the points era have been first, second, or third.

So I think there’s a bit of a challenge there in terms of in the points era, if you’re structuring bets, I think the lesson you take away is, yeah, some real long shots can come in, but you respect the favorites as well. Certainly for contenders obviously, but respect the favorite as well, if you start building an exact try or something like that.

To me, it’s a big contrast. I grew up and came of age in the ’80s and ’90s watching the Derby, and there wasn’t a single favorite those entire years who won the Derby. Again, we’ve had the majority in the points era of winners have been favorites.

EDDIE OLCZYK: Just real quick, we need to make sure that people are understanding that this challenging distance for these young three-year-olds, a lot of these horses will never run this distance of 1 1/4 mile at the Kentucky Derby in front of 165,000 or 170,000 people and all of the millions of people that will be watching from home. It is a very unique setting, and some horses, some equine athletes, some athletes, some people can tune it all out and just seem to be able to run their race or to play their game regardless.

Those are all things that, as a handicapper, you try to figure out is that, can some of these horses get that 1 1/4 mile? Can the racetrack carry them the little bit of an extra distance? Because we could all sit here and maybe give you 10 horses that are running the Derby, and we may all agree that their breeding suggests they can’t get the distance. But as I said earlier, the equine athletes don’t know what their odds are. They don’t know if there’s 20 million bets on them to win or 20 million bets for them to show. They do what they do.

That’s what makes it so challenging because – and a lot of them too, they’re not going to run in races that have 19 other competitors. That’s just not going to happen for the most part ever again. Now, I know ever is a long time, but those are all things that come into the running of the race that you try to handicap and you try to figure it out.

If they go really, really fast, like if we all knew this race was going to set Derby records for the first 3/4 of a mile, six furlongs, or the first mile of the race, it would be a lot easier to handicap because you know the horses that would be able to get the distance and be able to close into a fast pace.

Most recent memory is, and Steve made the brilliant point earlier, last year Rich Strike in a long shot, and now people are going to start gravitating to horses that maybe people think they have no chance and what have you.

So it makes for — that’s why this Friday and Saturday, not just the Derby, but the undercard races, as well as Lindsay mentioned, there is a boatload of value, and that’s why as a handicapper and a horse player, it’s a pretty good chance.

I don’t know if you can do this, but I’m going to really give it a try to go ahead and wear out an app on my phone because I’m going to probably be seeing a lot of value over the course of the weekend.

Q: With your experience on different — so close to horse racing through the years, when the Triple Crown wasn’t on one network, the horse industry kind of had this angst about not having the synergy of being on one network, and it seems like in the modern setup, is that less of a concern for the industry given that people are, I assume, more accustomed to multiple platforms, multiple networks, all those things?

RANDY MOSS: First of all, you’ve got to keep in mind that you’re talking to someone from NBC, right, who has a vested interest in this, who thinks that NBC does a fantastic job on broadcasting horse racing and that NBC should have all three Triple Crown races.

Getting that behind us, you can make the case that synergy is important. Someone perhaps from a different network could also make the case that in today’s media landscape you get professional sports, the NFL is on a lot of different networks, things like that, and maybe people are more accustomed now than they used to be back in the day of checking their local listings, so to speak, and finding out what network the program that they’re looking for is located on.

–NBC SPORTS–

Filed Under: Horse Racing, Kentucky Derby, NBC, transcript, Uncategorized

TRANSCRIPT – NBC SPORTS GOLF CENTRAL LIVE FROM THE MASTERS MEDIA CONFERENCE CALL

March 28, 2023 By admin

Tuesday, March 28, 2023

Rich Lerner

Brandel Chamblee

Notah Begay III

THE MODERATOR: Good afternoon, everybody. Welcome to our “Live From the Masters” media conference call. We will be joined by our host, Rich Lerner, Brandel Chamblee and Notah Begay III “Live From” studio team. We already have members of our production and on-air teams on the ground in Augusta for what will be more than 100 hours of programming from in and around Augusta National over the next 10 plus days.

We already had Paige Mackenzie and Morgan Pressel on Golf Today early this afternoon from Champions Retreat. For the first time, Golf Channel and Peacock will provide live coverage of the first two rounds of the Augusta National Women’s Amateur on Wednesday and Thursday starting at 1:30 p.m. eastern.

We then head to Augusta National Golf Club for “Live From the Augusta Women’s Amateur” Friday at 1:00 p.m. eastern. Final round coverage on Saturday begins at noon eastern on NBC and Peacock.

One of the best events on the entire golf calendar, Sunday morning, 8:00 a.m. eastern we will have live coverage of the Drive, Chip & Putt Finals on Golf Channel and Peacock, and then everything shifts to the Masters with our comprehensive studio coverage originating from Augusta National that begins Monday next week at 2:00 p.m. eastern.

RICH LERNER: Thanks, and thanks for jumping on. Always excited to go to Augusta National. This one, 2023, is as unusual as any I can remember. Potentially even uneasy and uncomfortable because of the presence of LIV golfers.

I don’t think there’s any way around it. This would be the first time that I can recall that Tiger Woods will very likely, certainly on Monday night barring any breaking news with respect to his health, first time that I can remember that on “Live From,” we likely, underline likely, will not lead with Tiger Woods, but instead the presence of LIV Golf, the 18 players that are set to tee it up there.

I think, again, at this point not knowing what may be said or how LIV players may or may not interact with PGA TOUR players, without knowing that at this point, our goal going in at this point is to cover LIV at least initially through the competitive lens.

You cannot deny however you feel about LIV. You cannot deny their accomplishments at Augusta and at the majors in general. Six LIV players have won seven of the last 13 Masters, going back to 2010. LIV golfers have won approximately 40 percent of all the majors played. These are significant figures in the game.

We’ll cover it and ask questions, how competitively sharp might they be, how much golf have they played, where have they intersected with PGA TOUR players on the worldwide competitive circuit, the Middle East earlier in the year, things of that nature.

And then we’ll have cameras trained to watch for any interactions in the tournament, the practice area. Will they be in the media center? Will Augusta make them available? Assuming they will, but we don’t know for sure at this point, so we’ll be ready on that front.

Then from there, we cover the Masters and we remember always that — at Augusta you take a breath. You slow down a little bit. People are tuning in I think because they’re curious as to how all this is going to go with respect to LIV, but also because they love the Masters and they want to find out about the changes at the 13th hole.

We’ll be in depth from the jump on Monday night. Jaime Diaz has a deep dive on the changes to the 13th hole and I know Brandel and Paul (McGinley) are there as it relates to the distance debate in the sport. We’ll certainly look at Rory and his ninth try at trying to complete the Career Grand Slam. High hopes again coming in for Rory.

I’ve said this before on shows that should he do it, I think he becomes the first bona fide legend of the post-Tiger Woods era. Very first. And then there’s Scottie. You cannot overlook Scottie. I think there is a tendency to do just that, but I think by Sunday night he could have us all rethinking just what we’re looking at here.

This is a guy it appears who’s built for the long haul, has the constitution and disposition to be maybe a six- or seven-time major champion. He’s sitting on one now, but if he walks out with back-to-back Masters on Sunday night, I think that would be a legitimate discussion.

Then Mickelson’s presence on the grounds we’re going to look at closely, as well. We have a wonderful feature on Sam Bennett, U.S. Amateur champion and the challenges he’s faced. We’re going to look at the green quadrants.

So we’ll be golfy. We certainly won’t be all LIV all the time. We’re certainly not going to shy away from that, but there’s so many other aspects to cover, as Brandel and Notah know full well.

THE MODERATOR: We’ll hand it over to Brandel Chamblee. Go ahead.

BRANDEL CHAMBLEE: Rich summed it up perfectly. I personally am very curious to see how the LIV players compete. I have peripherally paid attention to the competitions going on on LIV because to the extent that there are going to be players commingling in the major championships, it’s obvious that you’ve got to pay attention out there and how they’re playing.

But I’ll be curious to see how they play once they get to Augusta National, to see if they can make the transition to playing on a golf course that is quite a bit different in setup and the grasses that they’re playing on, where they’ll be playing on this week before they head to Augusta.

That’ll be very curious, and I think to the extent the media there this year will be a little bit different. There will be, I suspect, a number of media there who are present just to ask LIV questions, some pointed LIV questions, so no doubt that the players that we see in the media center are going to be asked some difficult questions about the decisions they have made to go to LIV.

To the extent that they get those questions asked to them, to the extent that they answer them honestly, that will, I think, dominate, unfortunately, the talking points for the first three days.

Once you move past that, I think you get to some very compelling aspects. First and foremost, our familiarity with Augusta National, at least here in the United States, is give every single shot historical context and adds to the drama, and the fact that it’s the first official major championship of the year gives it added weight.

Every single major championship is important no doubt, but it’s the Masters that is always just a little bit more memorable, certainly here in the United States.

And then of course you have the current and repeated theme of Rory McIlroy showing up with a chance to complete the Grand Slam. I agree with Rich when he talks about the significance and the possibility of Rory McIlroy possibly completing the Grand Slam.

When you start to look at all the players that are missing the third leg of the Grand Slam, there’s, what, 12 of them, something like that. And if you discount the first three, which really happened before there was a Masters, there’s really only been one great player I would say who came along with a chance to complete the Grand Slam at the Masters, and that was Lee Trevino, and he had this troubled relationship with the Masters. It just didn’t suit his game.

But I think beyond that, there are reasons specific to his Grand Slam why it didn’t fit his game, and I think he shared some of those reasons with Rory. I’m going to certainly dive into that as the week goes on, because I think that’s one of, if not the biggest, story of the week outside of LIV and Tiger. LIV and Tiger will dominate.

How Tiger plays, I think, will captivate us beyond belief, because what I saw earlier in the year from Tiger made me look towards the Masters with great anticipation. I never, ever thought I would see Tiger Woods play golf again the way he played at the Genesis.

Of course you can look at his finish and say there was nothing spectacular about it, but if you look at the combination of the power that he had there and so many of the iron shots that he stacked up on top of one another, and the fact that he showed some great putts on the greens, it certainly has the world of golf’s attention as we enter the Masters.

NOTAH BEGAY III: These guys summarized so many great things, and just from a general competitive context, I’m very much looking forward to comparing apples to apples in terms of LIV players and PGA TOUR players. I’ve been out there the last few weeks covering the PGA TOUR on the ground, watching these events come down to the very end and just seeing how sharp and competitive, how much these events and winning the tournaments means to the players.

There’s no question that there will be an element of sharpness to their game as they head to Augusta.

Question marks surround whether or not that same level of sharpness will be available to the LIV players, just not having played as much competitive golf at the highest level against the best players as the guys on the PGA TOUR.

I think that’s going to be something that I will be taking a direct look at.

In the broader context, I think that I’ve always been intrigued by just Augusta National in general, their influence on the game. We’re starting with ANWA this week, and then we’ll head into Drive, Chip & Putt. You talk about the Latin American Amateur Championship, the Asia-Pacific Amateur Championship, just what they’ve singularly done, not being one of sort of the official governing bodies of our sport, but sort of a de facto governing body and how they’ve really utilized their platform and their reach and the influence of the Masters and its brand to grow golf. I think it’s remarkable.

I think that these young amateur female golfers that have a chance to come play here is a dream come true, and I think it’s something that is going to do great things in a sector of our sport that needs some attention. The growth in the ladies’ part of the game isn’t, I think, commensurate with other areas of the industry, and I just think Augusta has done probably more so than any other organization in golf to use its platform to broaden the reach of the game and make it more appealing and bring people into it.

The viewership does that. The reach and the broadcasting of the Masters does that. But these little things, these events and the avenues to compete at Augusta in whatever capacity, ANWA, DCP, the Masters itself, have had a major influence in putting golf on young kids’ radar to want to pursue the sport that is just so amazingly hard, that in this day and age of instant gratification I think it’s really done a lot to keep a lot of young kids intrigued and involved with the game.

I attribute a lot of that to the Masters and what they’ve done to appeal to this next generation of young golfers.

Q: Curious to ask you about the changes to No. 13 this year. Seems like there are only two schools of belief right now. It’s either that the changes have cheapened the hole or they’ve restored its architectural integrity and significance. I’m curious to get your thoughts on that. What do you think?

BRANDEL CHAMBLEE: If you go back and look at the history of that hole when Alister MacKenzie and Bobby Jones first walked that property, that was the very first hole they found on the property.

Bobby Jones gets the credit for really discovering that hole and looking at it and saying, this is going to be the first hole — not the first hole as it’s played, but the first hole they could find.

But it was always intended when they designed it — Bobby Jones was not a fan of par-5s — that it took three shots to get on in regulation. So he was always a big fan of the in between sort of par-5s where you could get home with two good shots.

So even from the beginning that hole was meant to be sort of an in between, not quite a par-4, not quite a par-5.

If you look, here we are ninety years basically down the road and you look at the border behind you, they just really didn’t have any place to go. They were never going to move that green. So the hole was kind of landlocked.

So them being able to negotiate with Augusta Country Club and get that piece of property behind it and extend that hole I think is going to add some luster back to that hole, no doubt.

Look, as much as I’m against rolling the golf ball back, there were a few holes in the game of golf that when the pros played them, I did kind of wince. It did bother me. It does — to see players cut that corner and have a wedge in there.

Even though, look, Jack Nicklaus at his height hit 8-iron in there. He hit 8-iron into 15, going back in the ’60s. The longest of hitters have been able to, under certain conditions, absolutely destroy those holes from the philosophy that underpins them.

But as Rory said last week, we’re not going to be able to cut that corner unless it’s in a big way downwind. He said he’d basically just hit it straight out, which means you’re going to have at the very least, it seems to me, a mid-iron for the longest of hitters and long irons and maybe even some hybrids and woods into that green for these sort of middle-tier hitters.

I’m looking forward to it. That’s a change I felt like needed to take place for a long, long time. I’m very happy that it was able to work out, and I think it will restore some of the luster to that hole.

NOTAH BEGAY III: Just sort of echoing Brandel’s comments there in terms of seeing the greatest players of our game come through there at early points in our career, I was with Tiger in his first Masters.

Like I went with him in ’95, played as an amateur, and I think the biggest thing when he walked off after his first round was the fact that he hit pitching wedge into 15. Jack had an 8 (iron), Tiger hit a pitching wedge. I think the greatest players have always demonstrated sort of slightly better skill in certain areas than their counterparts.

But with regard to 13, when I played it — the last Masters I played was 20 years ago in 2001, and it still required a little bit of shape off of the tee. A lot of players were still hitting 3-wood, then a mid-iron, and if you really were able to sling it around the corner at times when the conditions were a little firmer, you might get a short iron in there.

But I just think it’s restoring the hole back to sort of what we saw — I would maybe go back to the early ’90s where guys would come in there occasionally with a long iron, but it’s usually a 5- or a 6-iron, something like that, and it’s just a hard shot. It’s a very hard shot to a small target with the ball above your feet. In most cases, that’s calling for a left to right shot, and I think that’s great that they’ve been able to restore it, and hopefully we’ll see more skill required than blasting something out there and then hitting a short iron in. I’m looking forward to it.

RICH LERNER: I would just add quickly, I think so long as on Sunday afternoon when it really matters we see, to Notah’s point, the 5-iron, maybe the 4-iron from the hanging lie, 230-ish, 225, 230, something on the order of what we saw — you think back to David Duval in 2000. He had the swirling winds and he backed off the shot a few times.

It was 196 that day, but that was one of the few poor shots he had hit that weekend where he played really well, and it cost him the tournament.

I think Brandel and Notah could back me up, 13 is certainly one of the most consequential holes in the history of the sport, and so long as it feels that way and we feel the weight of that shot right there, then I think it will have been a success.

(Bobby) Jones always said — called it the momentous decision whether or not to try for the green, and I would share with you I had a conversation with Ben Crenshaw not long ago, and Ben told me, and this wasn’t specific to 13, he was just talking about Augusta, but it’s most pronounced at the par-5s certainly and on the second nine on Sunday, “No one has ever played safe and won the Masters.” You have to risk. The golf course goads you in spots. That’s a spot right there for sure.

I think so long as it’s a middle iron, I think Brandel said depending on the conditions you might see 6 or 7 if you get it downwind, but so long as it’s a middle to maybe long iron, then I think the integrity will have been restored.

Q: Notah, already got a great answer from Brandel about Tiger. I’m curious what your takeaway was from seeing Tiger play, and maybe you could offer a little bit of color on what he’s been up to of late?

NOTAH BEGAY III: I mean, for good or for bad, I’ve had a ringside seat to this whole thing the last 10 years, and the fact that he was able to play at the level after basically being on the bench for six months, to come out and make a cut, I just can’t even get my mind around that. I know he’s Tiger Woods, but it is the PGA TOUR, and a high degree of play is required to compete at that level.

For him to go out and do that tells me a couple things, that he’s working on the right things. One thing that I think goes in his favor, the work that he did with Chris Como allowed him to gain a really strong understanding of his body mechanics and how he could generate the type of forces or club head speed, reducing certain types of stress or strain on his body.

Even though they did part ways a few years ago, I know Tiger has taken so much away from every single coach he’s worked with that I believe that’s really helped him in this next phase of another comeback, and just having a good clear understanding of just what pieces need to be strengthened, where he can increase stress, where he has to decrease stress in his mechanics to produce the types of shots.

He’s told me that there are certain shots that are not available to him anymore because of the stress that it does possibly put on his back, on his leg, so he’s had to sort of eliminate a handful of shots that just kind of don’t fall in line with trying to maintain the sustainability that he has to have.

He can still win. I mean, let’s not forget that. It’s not a question of ability. It’s a question of can he get through 72 holes and still maintain some strength and mobility in his leg on that final day. I think that’s the biggest question.

He was very tired after LA. Took him a few days to recover. Coming out of that, I think he got a good sense of, okay, just how hard he could push himself going into the Masters in preparation and just kind of how to pace himself during the week, and I think you’re going to see a nice measured preparation next week when he does arrive on the grounds as he just tries to figure out when and where to push himself.

Q: How much do you think what Chairman Ridley says about the golf ball will determine the direction that things go?

RICH LERNER: He’s enormously influential. I’ll make way for Brandel and then if I feel I have something to add to it, but that certainly would be one of the most if not the most — that’s saying something because LIV is there, but the most anticipated of all the Monday through Wednesday press conferences would likely be Chairman Ridley for what we anticipate he’s going to say about the model local rule and then also what he’ll say about LIV. But I’ll step aside for Brandel here.

BRANDEL CHAMBLEE: Well, I agree with what Rich says, monumentally influential, obviously with his prior ties to the USGA, and you just look at these gentlemen that are involved in this in the governing bodies and you look at Augusta National, and they certainly have the best interest of the game in mind.

I don’t know that anybody is wrong here on either side of this issue. I don’t think that anybody could clearly say that anybody is wrong. If you’re in favor of a rollback, there’s reasonable arguments for it. If you’re not in favor of it, I think there’s reasonable arguments on that side. On one hand, people will say we want to protect the integrity of design, and I certainly understand that.

On the other end, I would say you want to protect the integrity of the game, which is that it’s never been bifurcated. You can’t do one without doing the other.

It’s a matter of do you think going forward — I listened to Michael Whan the other day on the Michael Breed show, and he talked about Rory’s kids and his kids’ kids wanting to play a game that — I think his sentiment was that wasn’t dependent on brute strength, where you didn’t have to lengthen golf courses. And that point resonates, no doubt.

But on the other hand, it is nice to think that Rory’s kids and his kids’ kids might be playing, or could if they wanted to, play the same equipment as Rory.

There are two sides of this issue. Then at least in my view, and again, I said it earlier, there are a few holes in the world where it’s not fun to watch the best players in the world get up on the 12th hole at St Andrews and drive the green, and those bunkers down there that were such an integral part of that design and so genius and so stupefying as you stand there, and they don’t even have to contend with them. I understand that, and unfortunately, they can’t move that tee back. I think there’s an estuary behind that tee. That is unfortunate.

Look, I make — nobody is suggesting that they’d never go back to St Andrews again, but there are loads of golf courses that they don’t play major championships on again and they’ve moved on, but there are a handful of holes that it’s just tough to watch the best players in the world play. I think it’s a very small number of holes and it’s a very small number of players that because of the way they play those holes, it threatens to undermine what at least I think is one of the most important aspects of the game.

Essentially, and I think Mark Broadie’s research bore this out, what it takes to win hasn’t changed, and the influence of power is overestimated in the game, at least that’s my takeaway from reading Mark Broadie’s research, and I tried to read it as unbiasedly as I could.

So it’s an interesting debate. I’ve got a lot of friends, and I listen to the governing bodies, and I certainly listen to Chairman Ridley, and I have respect for them. I don’t think either side is wrong.

But if they do roll the ball back, it will favor — statistically speaking, it looks like it’s just going to favor the longer hitters because effectively it’s going to make the golf courses longer, so that’s going to disproportionately reward the longer hitters.

NOTAH BEGAY III: I’m against the rollback for a couple reasons. I think not enough credit is being given to the athletes themselves, and the percentage of players that can swing over 120 now is much higher than it was 30 years ago. Everything that’s been put into the evolution of the athlete, as well, I think is being a little bit overlooked here.

It’s not solely due to technological improvements in drivers and balls, although that does kind of have a little bit of impact in terms of what the overall outcome is on a particular drive that’s hit at 120 miles an hour club head speed, precisely like a PGA TOUR player can hit it.

So that’s sort of my take from the player standpoint, but also from the romantic point of view, I think our sport has always been one where the average golfer can directly connect with the players that they look up to. We can go the Monday after the World Match Play, and if you’re lucky enough and you know somebody at Austin Country Club, you can play the course from the same tees, you can use the same equipment, you can play in a pro-am if you’re lucky enough and get next to somebody whose game you admire.

I think there’s always been this amazing connection between an everyday player and the best golfers in the world that really doesn’t exist in any other sport, and I think by rolling these things back and separating the two groups — not only will it bifurcate the rules, it’ll bifurcate a lot of golfers that love putting the same ball in play that Rory plays or Tiger plays or using the same driver that these other guys use because at what point do we stop.

I just think that we’ve done enough to this point to maybe not allow it to increase more, but I don’t think we need to roll it back.

BRANDEL CHAMBLEE: Right, they drew a line in the sand in 2004. They initially did in 1998. I think they overlooked COR in the 1990s. I don’t think they had any idea that the Callaway Big Bertha was coming, and they didn’t, I don’t think, have the proper diagnostic tools to appropriately measure the COR in that, so in 1998 they established a COR limit, and then in 2004 they sort of changed their judgment, changed it to characteristic time, they put a line in the sand for MOI, put a line in the sand for the overall distance standard.

So from 2004 to now when you look at that difference in distance, it is too often contributed to technology and not often enough contributed to younger, taller, better athletes who are optimizing their launch angles.

RICH LERNER: I don’t think the governing bodies are suggesting that it is only the technology. I think that they absolutely acknowledge the work that’s been put in with respect to speed training, and they’re saying that if it continues at this rate, they’re just going to run out of land and that it would be irresponsible — I’m paraphrasing the governing bodies there, it would be irresponsible in their view to kick the can down the road, and if there are small measures that could be taken, why wouldn’t you in order to have a more, a better environmental footprint and to protect the cathedrals of the sport. I think that’s simply what they’re saying.

I don’t think they’re overlooking the athleticism. I think they’re staring the athleticism right in the face.

One other point I would say with respect to playing the same equipment. I think I can hold a golf club in my hand and it could be the same make and model, but I would no sooner be playing the same equipment than I would be driving the same Mercedes-Benz that they use in Formula 1. I think that sort of romantic idea in my estimation has been overplayed a little bit.

BRANDEL CHAMBLEE: Well, no, the Mercedes you’re talking about in Formula 1 is meant to (indiscernible). The driver that you have is meant to optimize your speed. I don’t think that analogy holds.

I would say looking forward that for them to assume the increases in distance that we’ve seen in golf over the last 40 years with unprecedented leaps and bounds in optimization of equipment, rebound effect and a solid core golf ball technology with unprecedented leaps and bounds in fitness I think is, at least in my view, not warranted.

There are limits to how young players can get on the PGA TOUR. There are likely limits to how tall and still be able to play equipment, especially when they’ve made the length of a driver shaft maxing out at 46 yards, so there are physical limits to what can be achieved in the game, and of course now there are technical limits to what can be built in the game.

So the idea that the leaps and bounds that we’ve seen in driving distance will continue unabated into the future, I personally think is unfounded. I just don’t see that happening.

But what I will say is that what we have seen is an undoing of improper training in the golf swing. So players now are going back to an era of the ’40s, ’50s and ’60s with regard to how they swing the club. The ’70s, ’80s, ’90s and 2000s was such an impoverishment of technique that it was mind-blowing.

So they are now returning to the more athletic golf swings of the ’40s, ’50s and ’60s, and it is like they’ve found the recipe for the pyramids again, and all of a sudden they’re building these majestic golf swings again, and so they’re unleashing the athleticism that’s been dormant for four decades.

RICH LERNER: Adam, I know one thing for certain, Brandel, you’ll back me up on this; we are going to be hearing “Wrap!” “Wrap!”

BRANDEL CHAMBLEE: They’re going to be bookending me on the set with their views of a rollback.

RICH LERNER: I’m with you, Brandel. I think there are — it’s nuances, and there are strong arguments on both sides. I don’t think it’s black and white, but I think what we haven’t really discussed, nor do we have time but it’s enormous, is the commercial viability of all of this. I mean, I don’t have to tell anybody on this call how complicated that part of it could be, would be.

Q: Rory (McIlroy) has been on a tear this season. I was wondering how you would compare him to his previous seasons, and what chances do you give him of winning the Masters this year?

NOTAH BEGAY III: If I didn’t get a chance to see him play this week — I watched two or three of his matches. I don’t think he’s putting well enough right now. Now, he put a new putter in play. He did see some signs of life in his putting at times.

But I think that is going to be the singular key. Everything else from the tee to the green is top shelf. There’s no question he is playing as good as anybody in those key areas. But there were just some key putts in certain situations at critical times in the match, and they weren’t difficult putts.

I don’t know if he just wasn’t quite — stroke wasn’t feeling right. I know he had changed the way he was lining up his putts. He was using a line on top of his ball for the first time in an effort to possibly get more athletic when, in fact, I felt like it made him less athletic. It made him less reactive and a little too mechanical, methodical, however you want to characterize it. But that’s going to be it.

As far as Rory is concerned, he’s got to find just a little bit of magic in the putter, because as Brandel referenced through research, the core ingredients to winning major events hasn’t changed. I know power is what we fixate on because it’s fun. Home run hitters, we love to watch because they’re fun. We could name the last few home run leaders in Major League Baseball, but you probably couldn’t name who led the league in batting percentage. It’s just fun.

But yeah, it’ll come down to putting a little bit above his normal average. Last week he was ranked 175th in strokes gained putting, and he’s still eighth in strokes gained total, which tells you how good everything else in his game is.

BRANDEL CHAMBLEE: Yeah, I think that’s reasonable. I thought it was awkward looking to see him using a line last week and setting it up and walking around and having to get in and readjust the line and so forth. Even though he did putt better last week. He made — he would have made dozens of must-make, in quotation mark, putts, and a few late that were absolutely must-make.

So the stroke overall looks great. I love the fact that he went to a blade. I’ve seen the data on forgiveness in mallet headed putters versus blade. On paper, mallets win 7-6, but I like the feel of a blade. I think it just plays into the intuition of a golfer better.

Having said that, I think there’s innumerable — there’s still a lot of hurdles for him to be able to win the Masters. The first one I think is just mental. Going up against the best players in the world is one thing but going up against the history books is another.

If you look at his first-round scoring average at the Masters prior to him having a chance to win the Grand Slam, 2009 to 2014, his first-round scoring average was under par, significantly under par, and then from 2015 to 2022 — in 2015 was the first time he had a chance to win the Career Grand Slam when he shows up at the Masters, and from that moment to last year, he’s averaged over par.

Now, 72.4 is his first-round scoring average, and historically speaking, if you get off to a poor start at Augusta National Masters, there’s really not much chance of you coming back because the golf course so quickly identifies who’s on their game, and then you just carry on playing great golf.

Last year he shot 73, the year before 76, the year before 75, the year before — these are first-round scores at the Masters, and I attribute that to nothing more than the pressure of trying to complete the Career Grand Slam. He’s got to get over that mental hurdle in round number one.

It could be as simple as the first round is more important than the final round. He has got to get off to a great start and that’s been, at least in my view, purely mental. In that same time period, he’s averaged under 70 over the course of his PGA TOUR career.

So you can’t say enough about the importance of the first round for Rory McIlroy, and then look, from a his swing standpoint and how does his swing match up to that golf course, it’s not a perfect fit, not at all. If you look at the players that dominate and have dominated at Augusta National, they are either very upright or they come over the top of it.

And Rory is not upright anymore. He swings much flatter and deeper, and he comes almost underneath it. That’s why I alluded to earlier, the only really great player that had a chance to win the Career Grand Slam that didn’t complete it because of the Masters was Lee Trevino, and Lee Trevino aimed left and pushed. He swung underneath it. His best finish ever at the Masters was 10th; mind you, he skipped it in some prime years because he just didn’t like the place.

So it’s not a great fit for Rory on paper. Having said that, he’s monumentally talented and can get around these hurdles. But the first round is the most important day of the week for Rory next week.

RICH LERNER: I would just jump and put a button on this. With Rory, there’s always more. He’s sort of asked to defend the established order, not just win the Open last summer but defend the established order because we pretty much knew Cam Smith was on his way out. So defend the established order at the Open, and he couldn’t quite do it. Be a hero back home in Northern Ireland, the Open in 2019, the weight of that was just a little too much or simply just win another major, now we’re working on almost nine years, so this comes with the territory.

When you get to his level, even with as much as he’s achieved, you’re asked to do what few have ever done. No one has as much historically riding as Rory. My hope is — I say hope because we are in the story business, root for the great stories, is that Rory is better equipped to handle this now. This goes to Brandel’s point, sort of the principal concern would be the mental and emotional strain.

I feel like Rory is a little bit better equipped to handle this, what with how he’s reacted to LIV, how well he’s played. Paul has called him — Paul McGinley knows him very well, calls him an inspirational player. He’s quite inspired at the moment to kind of carry the mantle for the PGA TOUR.

My sense is he’s better equipped, but all that said, Rory is still — as great as he is, he’s still the heartbreaker. Brandel and I were talking about this on Sunday. He was 2-up with three to play in his match against Cameron Young, and I don’t think Rory is alone in this, but he’s measured against what Tiger did and how Tiger closed, and no one closes or ever will likely, like Tiger. So you’re less feeling at times disappointed as we were at the Old Course, where he didn’t play poorly, he shot 70 in the final round, but he didn’t do enough. He didn’t make enough happen.

Again, he’s won 23 times now, which is a lot. He’s one from Gary Player and Dustin Johnson on the all-time wins list.

Yeah, he’s always asked for more, and I think he’s handled it well on the whole. Disappointing in terms of not being able to finish, but just in how he conducts himself, how he handles his interviews, transparency, honesty. I think that’s why he’s so well liked and there’s just this enormous wellspring of support and sentiment for Rory.

You know, a fun little game to play is what would be the most popular Masters win. Probably start with Tiger would be yet another comeback for all times, and then probably Rory would be next in line. There’s a case to be made for a Jordan Spieth win being super popular. But Rory continues to fascinate me.

He’s 33 now. There’s two ways to look at it. One is he’s running out of some time, running out of time here. The major window is shorter than people realize.

The other side of it is that Mickelson, if I’m not mistaken, won the first of his six majors beginning at the age of 33 in 2004. Maybe this is the start of a great run for Rory. His game certainly looks like it’s close, if not all the way there.

BRANDEL CHAMBLEE: I would just say, at least it’s my opinion, that the fact that Tiger Woods and Rory gave (indiscernible) LIV Golf the Heisman is one the best things that’s ever happened to golf. I think it may have saved the PGA Tour, but it most certainly protected the integrity of professional golf, which is that there is — it’s a sport based upon merit. You know, with like the city of Manhattan, a great many bridges to enter and a star system that feeds the development tours and underpinned by philanthropy.

What I would say is that Rory may go on to win the Grand Slam. He may win the Masters and be a part of that group. But I would say what he did in turning down LIV and being a voice for the future of the PGA TOUR and legacy and the merit of professional golf at the highest level is far more important historically to the future of the game than what him winning the Grand Slam would mean to the record book thing.

NOTAH BEGAY III: No argument from me on that.

Q: Notah, did Tiger say anything about 13 when he made his trip up there back in March?

NOTAH BEGAY III: No, I hadn’t really discussed any of the changes that were made, so no. Sorry for the quick answer.

Q: You walked all those matches last week. Is there a guy under the radar we are missing who you think could do something next week?

NOTAH BEGAY III: Well, I mean, gosh, I think I walked almost 40 miles last week in covering all those matches, especially the first three days because you’re just doing this rotation from 12 to 18, 12 to 18. Obviously when matches ended you just go back to the rotation.

Anybody that made it to the quarterfinals, you’d sort of have to give them a little bit of an improvement in their prospects of — and of course it’s through the field, of whether or not they could contend and possibly win, because to get out of your group is extremely difficult, and then to go out and win another match against other players who are playing extremely well, and you saw in those last three matches, the semifinals and the final, it’s coming down to a putt or two on one specific hole that really completely turns the matches around and the momentum that most players are dealing with in trying to win those specific matches.

Yeah, I mean, I would give a nod to sort of anybody that made it into that quarterfinals section certainly has an improved chance of contending at Augusta.

BRANDEL CHAMBLEE: I would say Jason Day. To Notah’s point in that quarterfinal is Jason Day. I would certainly be looking at Jason Day heading into the Masters.

RICH LERNER: I’m a huge fan of what Jason Day is doing now. Brandel and I had quite a few discussions on Live — not “Live From,” on “Golf Central,” from the Match Play last week, and Brandel can speak to it a little bit better about some of the changes he’s made, but I think we shouldn’t dismiss the fact that he was a great player at one point. I understand that was a fairly long time ago.

That was almost six years, seven years ago at this point, but the same respect we would give to any other former No. 1 in their comeback bid I’m not sure has been fully extended to Jason. I’m not sure why. He had fallen all the way to 175 in the world last October, and you get that far down it’s easy to dismiss a guy. But as he’s played better, I’m reminded of how competitive he was, how physical he was and is on the golf course, although now I think — and Brandel can back me up, there’s just a little bit more nuance and softness to the overall package which I think suits him at this point in his career what with the injuries he’s going through, but let’s not forget just how good he was and the level at which he won.

He would be my No. 1 guy I’d say. Tony Finau has a good record at Augusta National, was close the year that Tiger won. I think he would be an enormous breakthrough star if he were to win at Augusta of all places.

I think if you’re looking for a darker horse at this point, he’s a little bit older but experienced, can benefit the player and he has shown some form in ’23 on the comeback trail would be Justin Rose. He has had some close calls at Augusta. I would look at Justin.

Then I think back to where Notah was, it’s hard to dismiss Cameron Young, as long as he is, and he appears to be adding some polish to his raw power. I would think he’s worth a look, as well.

–NBC SPORTS–

Filed Under: conference call, Golf, masters, NBC, transcript, Uncategorized

Transcript: Monday Night Football’s Joe Buck, Troy Aikman and Lisa Salters Media Call

August 31, 2022 By admin

Monday Night Football’s Joe Buck, Troy Aikman and Lisa Salters Media Call

The post Transcript: Monday Night Football’s Joe Buck, Troy Aikman and Lisa Salters Media Call appeared first on ESPN Press Room U.S..

Filed Under: ESPN, NFL, transcript

NBC SPORTS 2022 U.S. OPEN MEDIA CONFERENCE CALL TRANSCRIPT

June 9, 2022 By admin

Thursday, June 9, 2022

Tommy Roy

Dan Hicks

Paul Azinger

Justin Leonard

Notah Begay III

THE MODERATOR: Good afternoon, everybody. Welcome to the NBC Sports U.S. Open media conference call. In a moment, we’ll be joined by members of our broadcast team, including producer Tommy Roy, Dan Hicks, Paul Azinger, Justin Leonard, and Notah Begay III.

NBC Sports is going to present more than 100 hours of the U.S. Open from The Country Club in Brookline, Massachusetts, across NBC, USA Network, and Peacock comprised of championship coverage, featured groups and featured holes and 40-plus hours of studio coverage with Golf Central Live From the U.S. Open on Golf Channel, starting on Monday, June 13.

We’ll begin with opening remarks from each of our speakers, a number of interesting connections to Brookline, as you all know. We’ll start with our producer Tommy Roy.

TOMMY ROY: Thanks, Jamie. Appreciate it. It’s a real honor to televise the U.S. Open and to do it with our great team. My goal is to give the viewers the best seat in the house as if they were right there on the tees, the fairways, and the greens themselves, experiencing the pressure of this cauldron and the ultimate reward for one player at the end.

To do this, we’ll do it through a robust technical facility setup, but never losing sight of the fact that this golf event more than any other requires story-telling. As it is an Open with many unknown qualifiers in the field and each having their own special story.

I still believe that every player who has earned the right to play in this field deserves the right to be shown on TV. So we’ll do our very best to get all 156 players in the field on the air, and yes, that includes the LIV players.

What a venue and its ties to the history of our game. We’ll be all over that, I can assure you, being in one of America’s great cities.

So really looking forward to next week, and I’ll turn it over to Paul Azinger.

PAUL AZINGER: Thank you, Tommy. Well, being a professional golfer for 30 years turned broadcaster and TV guy, now having landed here at NBC, I’m amazed at what goes on behind the scenes. When Tommy Roy says he’s going to get all the players on TV and can do that, it’s really only a feat that probably only he can pull off.

Honestly, it’s pretty chaotic for us on Thursday and Friday, but you know what, it’s the right thing to do. The effort that goes into scouting a course like Brookline from the network’s perspective, and now being deep into it and seeing what they do, blows my mind. 100 hours on the air. Then when you have all the Internet feeds and what have you, it’s such a sophisticated and complicated thing, it’s a miracle to me it ever comes to pass. I don’t know how it happens, but it does.

It’s an honor and a privilege to do it. I’ve done several U.S. Opens now actually. I wish I could have won one, I really do. I had a couple of chances. I had a decent chance right here at Brookline. I had a terrible front nine on Saturday in 1988, and it really cost me the championship.

But this is a really fun golf course. One of the great things about the U.S. Open to me is that they travel around and players have to come to an event where everything is extreme — the width of the fairways, the depth of the rough, the speed of the greens — and the fact that it travels to these golf courses makes it a mystery to the players. Some come in weeks early to figure out: how can I conquer this championship? And others don’t. They try to prepare in the nick of time because they just qualified.

In the end, isn’t it the greatest reward for any golfer to win a United States Open? It is. I’m thrilled to be a part of it. I love my broadcast team. There’s a couple of them still on the line here, so I’m going to turn it over. I know Brookline is a fabulous place. It’s not an easy course to learn. It’s hilly. It’s really hilly. There’s some quirky doglegs. Maybe there won’t be a lot of drivers off the tee. It’s a great second shot course.

So I can’t wait. I don’t know anybody who knows it on our broadcast team better than Justin Leonard, who had a thrilling moment there that will last forever. I’ll turn it over to Justin now.

JUSTIN LEONARD: Thank you, Paul. Brookline, the history there going back to 1913, the fact the 11th hole is going to be used for the first time in major competition since that U.S. Open in 1913 won by Francis Ouimet in the playoff. It’s cool to bring that touch of history back to it.

The routing’s changed quite a bit since we were there for the Ryder Cup in 1999. I was going through a yardage book last week, not one from ’99. I don’t have those anymore. Those have long been cleared out.

Current day, the big holes have gotten bigger. There’s still some great short holes. There’s a lot of areas where the fairway’s obscured off the tee, maybe not completely, but in some part, and it just plants that little seed of doubt in a player’s mind when they’re standing over a tee shot.

There’s a lot of options. You can take on some risk off the tee, create an easier second shot, but with that risk comes the possibility of having to chip the ball out back in the fairway or not having a second shot.

Just so cool how the change has been made. The 3rd and 4th hole, how they share this meandering fairway obscured by some rocks. Then the middle of the golf course has changed quite a bit as far as the routing, but it seems to make a lot of sense to host a U.S. Open with this current routing that will be used next week.

Then getting down to the last four holes, a lot happened there in ’99 and the Ryder Cup. Those holes are going to remain the same routing. Some minor tweaks have been made to those, but I expect the rough to be thick and deep. I expect we’re going to see a real U.S. Open. The green complexes are small, and within those green complexes, the areas that are pinnable are very small as well.

There are some areas you can use the slope to feed the ball into the hole. There’s a lot of false fronts. I think this test is going to require a very high level of proficiency from a physical standpoint, swing mechanics and all those things, but also the decision-making, understanding when to take on risk, understanding when it’s time to maybe play a bit safer shot, because the penalty, if you get on the wrong side of the green or wrong side of a hole location, it is severe, and as it should be when you’re deciding who’s going to win the U.S. Open.

With all that, Notah Begay is on the call. He’s going to be down on the ground doing a lot of things for us next week. I’d like to hand it over to him and hear his thoughts.

NOTAH BEGAY III: Thanks, J.L. Well said. I really love the championship for one reason and one reason only. It’s the single most democratic major event that we have in golf.

We’ve been talking and focusing on inclusion and DEI concepts in corporate America, nonprofit over the past two years now, but the U.S. Open has always been an inclusive process for anyone that has been willing to put the time and effort into the game, have their dreams focused on playing in this championship, possibly winning it, and then surviving an 18-hole qualifying and then sectionals.

Like we’ve seen in the past few days, players like Fran Quinn, Michael Thorbjornsen, a young player out of Stanford, working their way and playing their way into our nation’s championship, I really embrace that part of this championship. I get down on the ground, and I really love being part of the atmosphere because it’s not just the usual suspects, which are great and contribute to a wonderful storyline and really accelerate our ability to tell stories around their own personal pursuits of winning a U.S. Open, but it allows us to really dive in.

That’s where I feel like we’re the best. We really do our homework, we do our research, and we really care, genuinely care about the 156 persons that made it into the field. And why it matters, it’s because our executive producer, our team, and our entire production staff care about their story. We do anything and everything we can to bring the great, wonderful highlights to air so that we educate our viewers.

We try and articulate just how difficult. Just hearing Paul and Justin explain the intricacies of navigating a traditional venue, which is a major convergence between modern golf and old traditional design, it just tells you that that story-telling is difficult. But we do a wonderful job of being able to dive into the minutia of the field, the venue, and pull out what we feel is a very valuable storyline that embraces the game and everybody that chooses to take part in this game.

DAN HICKS: I’ll be brief with my opening comments. It’s been very nicely covered by the rest of our team.

This U.S. Open got into my DNA. Everybody that’s involved since it first came to NBC in 1995 at Shinnecock, when Corey Pavin hit the fairway, went up the hill, and Johnny (Miller) uttered the comments that he did, just a great call, shot of his life. It just became a part of who we are.

Even though we were out of it for a few years, it just seemed like it never left. I’m so looking forward to another U.S. Open at The Country Club. I had a chance to visit a few weeks ago to do some research. Even though we’ve been there before for some other events, we did the U.S. Amateur there, it looks dramatically better.

I’ll tell you, if you haven’t had a chance to see it, with the golf course restoration with Gil Hanse’s team with the U.S. Amateur and the upgrades to the clubhouse, the locker room, et cetera, it’s just going to be a tremendous U.S. Open. I know we say it every time, but it’s really going to be special with that history.

And I’ll add that The Country Club, with all that history and the fact that Francis Ouimet won there in 1913, that really launched golf in America, and we’ll get into that a little bit throughout the telecast.

In this particular time that we find ourselves in, the world of golf and what’s happening today in London and the divisiveness that it has created, I’m sad with that. But at the same time, I’m so looking forward to getting the focus back, even for just a week, if we can get everybody away from all this talk, for what makes the game great.

It’s the history, and it’s the quest by these players to be a part of that history, and I really look forward to diving into that 100 percent full-time next week.

THE MODERATOR: Danny, did your research include taking your golf clubs?

DAN HICKS: I did not. I was so immersed in trying to figure out what the new routing is going to be, I did not take the golf clubs. But Justin mentioned this little par-3 11th hole. I think it’s going to be fantastic. They’re going to put that hole on the back edge there, and it’s just going to be a departure from the monster par-3s that seemingly we’ve been in the habit of seeing in major championships.

This place has got charm. It’s got history. It oozes character, and it’s just going to be a great venue again.

THE MODERATOR: Awesome, Dan. Thank you very much. I recognize, as Dan referenced, a number of notable topics in the world of golf right now. We ask the media, before we open this up, that you do your best to keep the questions to the U.S. Open next week.

Q: Hi, everyone. Two questions on two totally different topics. Tommy, any technical things you want to point out that we may be seeing next week for the first time or any cool things to watch for?

TOMMY ROY: I would say we have tracing ability on all the shots, except for 1 and 11, and there we have speed shots for that opening tee shot. Particularly the 11, the short par-3 that falls off on all sides, that’s a much better way to cover that shot.

We have bunker cams at 5 and 16 and a 130-foot wire cam behind the 18th green. Scorpion crane that can see 15, 16, 17, 18. The front of the 8th green slopes way off, so balls are going to be spinning back. So we go on to the robo onto a tree to see that. Live drone, airplane, our hole models, our virtual graphics. The Ross virtual graphics that we used in the Super Bowl and the Olympics, we’ll have that this U.S. Open.

Pinpoint wind technology and pinpoint greens technology to calculate the breaks. We have the 4D replay system at the 12th tee that has the AD8 cameras there and a couple Super SloMos, X-Mo, et cetera, et cetera.

Again, lots of technology, but the key thing we need to pay attention to is the storytelling, which happens to be right in our wheelhouse.

Q: Then for Paul, Justin, or Notah, whoever wants this, Dan referenced the 2013 U.S. Amateur. Lo and behold, Matt Fitzpatrick shoots 64 today in Canada to start off his RBC Canadian Open. How much of a confidence boost is it to, A, play well the week before and then, B, know that you’re going to an event next week that you’ve won at before?

PAUL AZINGER: Are you trying to handicap Matt Fitzpatrick? Do you want us to handicap him for you?

Q: If you want, Paul, go right ahead.

PAUL AZINGER: He’s so good anyway, but it can only serve him well to play great and then go to a place where he’s going to be very confident, great memory. So heck yeah, he’s going to love it. If he keeps it up — I don’t know, maybe if he wins, he’ll have a let-down, but if he’s going in there with any kind of confidence at all, I would watch him like a hawk.

JUSTIN LEONARD: And I think there’s value to having played the U.S. Amateur there because in a lot of ways, the USGA tries some things with the golf course and keep those notes knowing that the U.S. Open is going there. Although it’s been, what, nine years now, the routing will change some, but he’ll have a familiarity there. He’ll understand the things that he’ll need to do around the greens.

Yeah, I certainly like the guys — not many will have that kind of an advantage. I don’t know what the total number of guys who played in 2013 at the U.S. Amateur that will be at the U.S. Open, but it can’t be more than eight to ten guys. But, yeah, I think in this day and age, everybody’s trying to find their advantage, a way to give themselves a little bit of an edge. And I’m sure he’s going to think of that as an advantage, and that’s as important as actually having one is the fact that he thinks he has one.

NOTAH BEGAY III: On the back end of that, I think one of the most intriguing things about the venue is the number of blind shots the players are going to be dealing with. It’s not something that we love, but certainly it’s a part of the design, and championship golf at that highest level requires you to hit as many shots as you possibly can with absolute certainty.

Being able to get rid of any doubts around potential lines that you can take, maximizing the width of the fairway because you know where those boundaries are because you’ve played there, and you not only played there, you played there with success.

So to Paul’s point, any time you’ve had success at a venue and you’re pulling into the parking lot, you feel better. If you were to come off a successful week in Canada, you would feel even that much more confident about your ability to contend.

Q: This is a question for the group. The U.S. Open has a tradition of being the toughest test in golf. What unique test do you think Brookline will present to the players next week?

JUSTIN LEONARD: I think it’s unique. As Notah just mentioned, the number of shots that players hit where you can’t see everything — the 3rd hole, the fairway’s obscured from you because of a big kind of rock outcropping on the right-hand side; the same thing down the 4th — that happens all over the golf course.

Just the guys who really put their time in in the practice rounds and get comfortable off the tee and understand kind of their strategy and how they want to go about doing it. There’s going to be holes where guys are going to hit driver or be more aggressive. There’s other holes where some players, like the 9th, they’re going to lay way back at the top of the hole and not hit in the penalty area on the right and play more conservatively.

Just the difference in strategy, but really I think the U.S. Open is about committing. Whatever a player and a caddie decide to do, they’ve got to be 100 percent committed to it.

Q: Paul, Notah, any comments from you guys?

PAUL AZINGER: I’ll say that Brookline is a very strategic course. I think it will keep the players off balance. You have to drive the ball in the fairway, and you’re going to see a variety of clubs off the tee at Brookline, I feel like, and different philosophies maybe on how certain holes are going to be played there. It is a masterpiece, it really is.

You’re going to see a variety of strategies taken on Brookline, but the key to me, all U.S. Opens, generally the rule has always been put it in the fairway first. Bryson [DeChambeau] kind of maybe put an end to that for a little while by saying, hey, look, I’m going to take on the golf course with my power and hit it as far as I can, and he came out on top at Winged Foot. I don’t know if that will work here with all the uphills and downhills and stuff.

Inevitably what happens in these U.S. Opens, the winner has an incredible short game feel that week. Geoff Ogilvy even at 6, 7-over par winning at Winged Foot had an incredible short game that week. Mickelson stayed alive because of his short game. It’s going to come down to that. We’re going to see a dramatic highlight reel of short game magic, whoever hoists the trophy.

NOTAH BEGAY III: Yeah, that’s 100 percent true with regard to surviving a U.S. Open. I mentioned earlier sort of this crash of modern golf and the mindset that young players that are coming onto the TOUR arrive with. Covering the NCAA Tournament on the men’s side last week and just seeing just how just much power — and we understand. We’ve all talked about it over the last ten years, but it’s front and center now where, if you’re in college and you’re not seeing 120 miles per hour, you’re losing ground.

I think that mindset is not going to do you well at The Country Club. I think it’s going to be difficult for players that week after week trying and hit it as far as they can to get the shortest club into the green because that’s what is dictated on the PGA TOUR for the most part from week to week. That’s not going to be a sound strategy.

It’s very difficult for the modern player to back down because they feel like they’re not maximizing the statistics. They’re not opening up these different opportunities that all of these various algorithms have spit out over the last 10, 15 years.

The player that can pick and choose — like Paul said, you’ve got to pick and choose when to push the gas down, when to push the envelope a little bit. And then as Justin stated, you have to know when to hit less club to find the fairway because you will not access any of these hole locations if you’re coming from the rough.

Q: I wanted to ask something for all the players and then a quick thing for Tommy. Kind of on the back of what you’ve just been talking about with the golf course, and also I guess maybe thinking a bit about the Old Course, but players, it seems like right now, are really on this ‘show up Monday, learn the course, have the caddie kind of do a lot of scouting thing, and play nine holes a day.’

I’m curious how you feel that current mindset — and it may change now that Justin Thomas did a scouting trip at Southern Hills and won — but that’s kind of the thing. Do you think that’s going to work at The Country Club? Then I guess I’m kind of curious too about the Old Course and how you — I know I’m getting a little ahead of myself, but I’m curious what you all think.

NOTAH BEGAY III: Great question. I always felt like the more rounds, the more looks you can get at a venue, especially ones that aren’t regularly seen on the PGA TOUR schedule, is a huge advantage. But history has proven that players aren’t willing to take scouting trips just to define start lines off tees or boundaries with regard to when and where they can be aggressive.

One of the things that was critical to Tiger Woods’ win at St. Andrews was he had old notes from the first time that he went around St. Andrews — you know, where TV towers were located, buildings, churches, hotels — and because the terrain is so flat there, sometimes you can’t get a good bearing because all of the dunes kind of look the same after a while.

But he was using landmarks to frame tee shots for himself, and then he would frame those tee shots based upon wind direction and take notes on that. Then he would study them every night before he would go out just to make sure he had a good understanding of — regardless of where the wind was coming because the wind direction would shrink some fairways and would make other fairways bigger — he wanted to know exactly what club to pull out of the bag off those tees.

Point in case, he didn’t hit it in one bunker all week, which tells me, number one, you’re hitting it really well, but you also have a good approach to navigating yourself around the venue. And I think that’s sort of similar to anyone that’s had a look. If I were playing in the field, I’d call Justin Leonard and just kind of pick his brain to see what he thinks they need to do to get around that place because he’s got a pretty good feel for it.

JUSTIN LEONARD: My phone is not ringing off the hook, I can tell you that (laughter).

It’s kind of a fine balancing act between — you know, it’s a U.S. Open. It’s going to be difficult. So the players feel like going out and playing a six-hour practice round two or three days in a row is too much, and I understand and appreciate that. But playing the front nine one time and think you have an understanding of The Country Club, I think that’s naive.

So I think the scouting trips are important. Obviously these players have to manage their rest. With all the devices that are available to you for recovery and all those things, finding that balance. I think, one, you have to play The Country Club at least twice, 36 holes, to really be somewhat comfortable off the tee. I don’t know if you’ll ever really get there as far as being comfortable, but it certainly helps.

I know that when I’ve been over and played a new golf course or go to play links, it’s like after the second day, I feel somewhat comfortable. But it’s really that third day where I’m seeing 18 holes for the third time that I’m really comfortable off the tee, and I don’t have to have my nose in the yardage book quite as much.

So the guys that took a scouting trip, I think there’s an advantage. And the guys who — you know, their caddies — this is a big week for caddies, as is every week. But playing a new golf course where there’s so much going on off the tee, it’s important for caddies to be able to help players define, ‘okay, here’s your left edge, here’s your right edge with this club in these conditions.’ And understanding that you’re going to have to be able to make adjustments on the fly. Those things are important and very underrated as far as what a caddie brings to the table.

I think players are going to need — it’s going to be a long week regardless, but they’re going to need to put some time in the golf course. Same thing with St. Andrews for the guys that haven’t been there before. The guys on the PGA TOUR have gotten so much younger, there will be a lot of guys who haven’t played St. Andrews. To get out there and define your tee shot by the left edge of a grandstand or a TV tower or a steeple off in the distance, it’s a little disconcerting at first.

Certainly, I think the European players understand it more than most of the American players do, but these two next major championships are going to require a lot of homework from these players.

PAUL AZINGER: Well, I’ll just say that I pretty much always believe there’s no real shortcut to success, and if you’re not going there early — you know, I said this in the opening. One of the great things about the U.S. Open, one of my favorite things is that the event travels, and it travels to really phenomenal golf courses. Look at what’s coming up in the future of U.S. Open venues is incredible.

But it’s kind of you’ve got to get there early if you’re in — and not everybody has that option because some of these players just qualified. But if you’re a serious contender, I’ve always believed that you can’t hope for this or wish for it. You have to prepare to win the U.S. Open, and I think getting there early is so important because you can then know that you have out-prepared everyone who didn’t get there on time.

To me, on time is getting there at least once before the event, maybe twice; playing with a local caddie and the best member at the club; utilize everything you can to gain an advantage in preparation for an event like this.

Not everybody can set up like that. I’ll tell you one great story. Tony Jacklin’s son qualified, Sean, for this event, and it will be his first ever PGA TOUR event, and I just told him, I said, this is an interesting golf course, Sean. If I was you, I’d go on the Internet and start looking at the holes and start studying this course. Francis Ouimet is a heck of a story, but if Tony Jacklin’s son wins the U.S. Open, it’s a pretty good one too. You might want to wrap your mind around that.

What’s the first thing I tell him? Start looking at that golf course. That’s the key. So if you’re not doing that, I think that you are hoping and wishing. If you do get there early, you, like, have an intention.

Look, Dustin Johnson didn’t play Oakmont before Monday or Tuesday, and he won the tournament. So not everybody’s the same. That’s just my feeling on that.

Q: Tommy, real quick on trying to show all the players, can you just tell us, is that something you — do you start out with a game plan, or is it you just start covering golf and Tommy Randolph keeps a list and you check off names? How do you do that?

TOMMY ROY: Yeah, we do check off the names. And by the way it starts with Brandt Packer, who’s producing the mornings each day. He’s keeping track of it as well.

But yeah, it’s trying to get as many of them in as possible, and then some of them slip through the cracks. We’re trying to find them and get them on the air in some sort of meaningful way. Just showing a shot, you can do that, but I want it to be a good shot, some sort of a meaningful shot so that the guy gets a little bit of love on the air.

By the way, I wanted to say one thing. We’re talking about the 11th hole. In my opinion, it’s going to have a huge impact on the outcome of this championship, but wait until the world sees the 15th hole next year at LA North. This thing is shorter and even more diabolical and spectacular. And I know you had something to do with that, so it’s the way to go with that.

Q: Phil’s got such history with the six runners-up at the U.S. Open. What do you expect from him next week? How do you think he’ll handle the pressure? What do you think the response will be from him being in the event to begin with?

PAUL AZINGER: Hey, that’s why we watch.

NOTAH BEGAY III: That is why we watch. We want to see what’s going to be the response. This is a major thing that’s going on. It’s a major disruption to the sport. I don’t know how the American golf fan — especially in Boston, there’s no telling how that reaction’s going to be. I think it’s going to be much anticipated.

PAUL AZINGER: That’s for sure.

JUSTIN LEONARD: I think the response will be mostly positive because he has been a fan favorite for so many years.

But that Boston crowd, they’re going to let you know how they feel. Not everyone, but a lot of people in Boston, they like to not only attend these sports, but they become active participants. I’m sure there will be some participation by the fans in Boston, both positive and negative.

I’m really more curious where his game is, just because he hasn’t played competitively in so long. U.S. Open tests with a thick rough, he’s had a lot of success at U.S. Opens, and certainly it would be a remarkable story if he does get in contention, but it’s going to require very sharp skills and skills that Phil Mickelson doesn’t always shine with as far as hitting fairways and being extremely strategic in that sense.

So I think we’re all curious to see both how he plays and how he’s received.

DAN HICKS: I think if Phil gets in contention, he’ll be cheered on very enthusiastically. I think it’s just a natural reaction in sport because people know he’s been chasing this U.S. Open forever. It’s the final piece of a grand slam puzzle. It would be an unbelievable story, with everything that’s happened with him in the last several months. I think, if there was any negative kind of reaction, that would be totally drowned out by people watching what was happening in front of him.

So I think it’s in large part due to how he plays. And let’s face it, Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson are the two biggest — you never know what they’re going to do. Look at what Tiger’s done. I would not be surprised if Phil gets there next week and hangs around the leaderboard. He lives for that kind of thing, no pun intended. He lives for weeks like next week. He absolutely, that’s been his whole DNA his entire career.

So I wouldn’t be surprised, first of all, if he is. If he is, I know the Boston crowd — and we know especially now in the NBA Finals, you get a feel for how vociferous those guys cheer, the fans cheer — I think they’ll be on his side. It will be something you can’t take your eyes off of if he plays well.

NOTAH BEGAY III: I think Dan brings up a great point. We’ve had athletes throughout history end up in jail and do things that were extremely controversial, but if they have success in their respective sport on the field, the public seems to be very forgiving with regard to that.

I mean, look at Tiger Woods’ struggles off the golf course a number of times, and all seemed to be forgotten when he became the Masters champion back in 2019.

I think this is a slightly different take on the whole thing. Those were personal choices that athletes made that had an adverse effect on their lives. Phil’s choices have kind of fractured the locker room, so to speak, and lent itself to sort of more deeper ethical thought as to how athletes do utilize their time to support various types of initiatives related to the promotion of different ventures that have ties to things that not everybody agrees should be promoted.

So that’s the first thing to overcome is there are going to be people in the locker room that don’t agree wholeheartedly with what is happening now with the Saudi or the LIV Tour.

Also, Phil’s always been one of the favorites amongst spectators, and he feeds off of that energy. That might not be the case starting out. Now, I agree with Dan, if he does get in contention Saturday, Sunday, I think that will all shift back behind Phil. But initially starting, not everybody there is going to be a hundred percent supportive.

As Justin stated, they will speak their mind,

And that’s going to depend on whether Phil can sort of fight through all that and let his game do the talking. The fact that he’s been on the shelf for the better part of the beginning of this whole year, I just don’t see that happening.

PAUL AZINGER: I predict that, if Phil’s missing the cut, like on Friday afternoon or something, it can get pretty rough on him, though. I just think — this is a big step these guys have made. They’ve changed the game forever probably.

But I agree, he is so popular, Notah. You’re right, and people do forgive. If it’s Phil Mickelson — I’ve always loved Phil Mickelson. He’s always been great to my kids. I’ll always appreciate him for that. I don’t necessarily agree with everything he’s ever done, that’s for sure, but if he does get in contention, it would be a miracle, I really think. A minor miracle that that guy could get in contention with all that’s been going on. But we’ll cover it fairly, I’ll tell you that.

Q: What did you learn about the championship makeup of Jon Rahm, the way he finished off the U.S. Open last year? And what have you seen from him in the last few months that makes you think he possibly could defend the title?

PAUL AZINGER: I don’t know if we’ve seen a whole lot from him. He’s played okay, but definitely not Jon Rahm standards. He’s definitely slipped a little bit. We’ve all seen that.

From last year, that tournament was up for grabs. Really any number of tremendous players could have won that tournament. If you go back and look at it, Bryson’s there for a while. Then it looked like Rory McIlroy and then Oosthuizen.

For Rahm to come out on top and the way he did it under the circumstances with all those great players there, the enormous pressure on Rahm, it was just such a massive step for him as a man and as a player to hole those two putts at the end of the golf tournament. And to put on that kind of short game — which is never his strength — but to put on that kind of short game display there at the U.S. Open and to hold that trophy was a real battle of nerves and will.

I think everybody has so much respect for him. His legs and the way he’s built, he just reminds us all of Jack Nicklaus when he was young. He’s got that kind of power and that big, long swing. I just feel that Rahm is mentally a real testament to what players have to become to win huge events.

Rahm epitomizes what hard work is all about and intestinal fortitude because he made putts when he had to. And it’s not his strength, and I really respected him for that.

Q: Just wanted to follow up on Adam’s first question there. I’m wondering, how do you guys approach covering the Phil and the Dustin Johnson situation heading into next week? How do you guys face that as sort of journalists and people in the media covering the tournament?

Tommy, you want to start with that?

TOMMY ROY: Yeah, I’m glad to. Bottom line is no matter what player we end up showing, if they’re coming off a significant finish in an event the week before, we’re going to mention it. Obviously whoever wins in Canada, we’re going to show him. We’re going to mention he won in Canada.

If we show a LIV player who won last week, that will be mentioned. That’s being journalistically sound. We’re not going to shy away from something like that. But in terms of getting into fracturing the game of golf and all that, we’re not doing that. This is U.S. Open week now and not talking about that stuff.

DAN HICKS: Yeah, I think there’s one way to cover it, and that’s what Tommy said, journalistically. If a guy’s in contention, you cover him. You mention that he’s part of the LIV Tour. You cover that because that’s been obviously a gigantic talking point, and then you see where the championship takes you from there.

That’s the great thing about live sports. It’s unscripted. We don’t know what’s going to happen. Sitting here right now, we can’t predict what the field is going to be. If hypothetically Dustin Johnson is coming down the back nine looking for his third major championship, there might have been things that happened during the week that we’ll have to deal with. Maybe it’s something that Dustin Johnson added to his whole reasoning why he’s playing over there or whatever.

It’s a reactionary type of thing, but in the basic, basic journalistic ethics, you cover the people that are playing in the U.S. Open, and you cover them appropriately depending on where they are on the leaderboard.

MODERATOR: Thank you everybody for joining today. We really appreciate it. We’re going to have a transcript available on this call for NBC Sports later this afternoon. Our comprehensive coverage next week begins at Golf Central Live From the U.S. Open and Golf Channel, Monday at 1:00 p.m. Eastern. Coverage begins next Thursday, June 16th, across NBC USA Network and Peacock.

Thank you everybody for joining. Have a good day.

Filed Under: Golf, NBC, transcript, Uncategorized, US Open

TRANSCRIPT – 2022 U.S. WOMEN’S OPEN CONFERENCE CALL

May 26, 2022 By admin

Thursday, May 26, 2022

Morgan Pressel

Tom Abbott

Jerry Foltz

Kay Cockerill

Karen Stupples

THE MODERATOR: Hello, everybody. Thanks for joining today’s NBC Sports U.S. Women’s Open media conference call.

In a moment we’re going to be joined by a number of our commentators from our broadcast team, including Morgan Pressel, Tom Abbott, Jerry Foltz, Karen Stupples, and Kay Cockerill.

NBC Sports is going to surround the U.S. Women’s Open with more than 25 hours of live coverage on NBC, USA Network, and Peacock next week.

It marks USA Network’s return to golf a little bit having hosted golf coverage of events such as The Masters, the Ryder Cup, and events from the PGA TOUR in the past.

So USA Network is certainly no stranger to golf. We’ll also have some exclusive windows on Peacock and we’ll have featured groups coverage on Peacock each day, as well as live from the U.S. Women’s Open which is going to be on-site providing studio coverage leading into and following each round on Golf Channel.

MORGAN PRESSEL: Thanks, Jamie. I’m certainly super excited to go back to Pine Needles. It is a special place for me personally, a special place certainly for the women’s game.

I guess the story this year probably being the $10 million purse, largest purse ever, and the partnership of the USGA and ProMedica jumping on board and really trying to draw attention to the pay gap and helping us continue to get closer there.

Pine Needles, the first place I played a professional event when I qualified as a 12 year old back in 2001. I played again in the final group in 2007. It’s just such an incredible test of golf. I actually also covered the U.S. Women’s Senior Open there. I believe that was in [20]19.

So just a lot of history – all Hall-of-Famers who have won there in the past, the three times previously that we’ve played. It just is an incredible test of golf.

Women’s Open is always my favorite event, it was always the biggest event on my schedule, and I’m excited to be calling the action this year.

TOM ABBOTT: Good to be with you. Looking forward to it. It’s going to be my 48th women’s major that I’m going to work for Golf Channel and NBC, so ticking close to 50, which should happen at the Amundi Evian Championship. It’s been an incredible run, and I’m really looking forward to seeing how this plays out.

I think there’s a number of different storylines if you look at the top players from the U.S., we’ve got some question marks about a couple of players in terms of Danielle Kang and Nelly Korda. Danielle is struggling a little bit with her form, Nelly obviously with her fitness, but looking to return for the U.S. Women’s Open.

So I think it’s going to be very exciting. You look at the amateur contingent in the field, it’s extensive, and I think that’s going to be a fascinating story. Wouldn’t surprise me if an amateur player challenges next week maybe all the way until the end. We’ve seen that before at the U.S. Women’s Open.

And then of course Michelle Wie West. I was with her here in Las Vegas last week for a corporate event, and she was very keen to play next week. But obviously the recent news is that she’s going to scale back her career after next week’s U.S. Women’s Open, so that’s obviously going to be a big story. She’s been a huge character in the game, so I think she’ll get a lot of attention.

Really looking forward to it. I think it’s going to be a really big week for NBC Sports.

JERRY FOLTZ: I’ve never been to the course, but I am looking forward to it. Never been to Pinehurst, that entire area. So being kind of the cradle of golf — not really history, I guess, but so coveted amongst golf purists, I’m looking forward to seeing it, visiting it, watching the ladies play, and I’m looking for some of the storylines that could play out.

Tom mentioned, hinted at a couple, but Nelly Korda, her family has been so guarded with information about her recovery from the blood clot, understandably, too, because one Tweet and you get people saying crazy things to you.

But the one thing her dad did tell me was you have no idea how much it hurts her to be watching this today, and that was on Thursday of the Chevron Championship.

I think she would love to make a big splash and return in a big way, if indeed she is fit and healthy to play. I know she has a press conference scheduled early in the week.

Lexi Thompson, who’s playing great coming in, and the U.S. Open is always about ball-striking and nobody is better. Maybe statistically not as good, but statistics can lie sometimes, and I think she’s definitely on the very short list of favorites.

Jin Young Ko doesn’t seem to be at the top of her game right now or she would definitely be the No. 1 favorite on most experts’ opinion.

And Danielle Kang is a question mark. She’s not seemingly playing her best right now. Didn’t play well yesterday in her first match at Bank of Hope Match-Play here in Vegas.

A lot of great storylines to look forward to, and it’s just something really special with what Mike Whan has done in his new leadership at the USGA to bring the purse to $10 million and really help narrow that pay gap that Morgan mentioned.

KAY COCKERILL: Well, there’s not too much more to cover than we’ve heard already, but I am really happy to be here or be there next week. It will be my 21st U.S. Women’s Open that I’ve covered, and fortunate enough to have played in five early on in my career as I was an amateur transitioning into professional golf before I hit the big brick wall and moved into the media side of things.

My first U.S. Women’s Open was in ’95 at the Broadmoor watching Annika win there, and she was obviously well-known in college and had a good amateur career, but she was not really on anyone’s radar.

She kind of came from behind and beat Meg Mallon and Pat Bradley, some of the big names in the game, and it’s pretty cool that we’ll be there. I was there in ’96 when she won again back-to-back.

And then think about Karrie Webb, who also played in the 2001 U.S. Women’s Open at Pine Needles, and she won back-to-back, as well. She had won the previous year. So kind of a neat connection there.

And also seeing Annika tee it up again this year will be very interesting by virtue of her easily winning the U.S. Senior Women’s Open last year.

I actually played in the U.S. Senior Women’s Open at Pine Needles, and even though I had covered two previous Women’s Opens there, until you play the course and you realize just how diabolical those greens are and you almost have to find a 15- or 20-foot center of every green no matter where the hole is located otherwise your ball is rolling off the sides of the green, until you play it, it’s remarkable how challenging the course is.

I look forward to watching the best in the game try to tackle it this year.

KAREN STUPPLES: It’s awesome being in last place because everyone said everything already that can possibly be said.

Putting my own little spin on things, obviously the storylines have been covered, the players, everything, everything that’s going on there with those.

For me, what I’m going to find most fascinating about going there — Like Jerry, I’ve never been there — so this will be my first trip to Pine Needles. I have been to Pinehurst but not Pine Needles.

What I’m really looking forward to and having read through what a number of players have said about it, particularly the past champions, Sörenstam, Webb, and Kerr. Webb says knowing where the slopes are on the greens and knowing where the ball will feed off means precision iron play. Kerr won by making a ton of saves.

And Annika played very much precision golf, as well. But all three of them went into that tournament knowing — into the championship knowing that they were in good form, that they were playing well, that they had what it was going to take to win that week.

When I look through players that have been playing well, players that are ready to be tried and tested this week, Lexi Thompson has been on the verge of playing well, Hannah Green there or thereabouts, Jin Young Ko, as Jerry was saying, has yet to find some form. She hasn’t been hitting as many greens as she normally does, and that’s going to be a big factor around Pine Needles.

A player that nobody has mentioned yet is Brooke Henderson. She’s taken some time off, so hopefully she can come in being pretty fresh.

But for me the interesting thing is how these players — this course it’s incredibly tricky — how they’re going to handle those runoff areas and the slopes in the green, what’s going to challenge them short game wise.

And the other thing, will Yuka Saso be another player to go ahead and back up the victory with another one? Webb was the last person to do it in ’01; Annika did it in ’96. Can Saso do it this year? It’s been 20 years, so it could be time.

Q. There’s been a lot of discussion already about the purse at the U.S. Women’s Open next week, and I know that’s going to be a really big storyline heading into the tournament week. But I’m kind of curious, looking at the sort of light of women’s sports in a different light, I’m wondering what responsibility do you guys feel as the people covering the women’s game to showcase the sport sort of in its most entertaining light?

KAREN STUPPLES: I think we all feel a tremendous responsibility to cover women’s golf in the best light possible. Obviously you want to watch golf for entertainment first, but I think a lot of the entertainment comes from the competition, and it comes from the play that the players are displaying, and how we describe their play and their shots and what they’re actually doing on the golf course.

Perhaps it should be about the competition. It should be about the matchups that you’re seeing and who’s going to prevail and who’s got the game that’s going to win on certain golf courses at certain times, and what have they been doing to make that an opportunity for them to win.

So for me it’s about us talking about the competition, and I think we all feel very passionately about it. Every single one of us, on all of our careers and our teams that cover women’s golf, whether it’s — I’ve just come from the NCAA Women’s Championship — to amateur tournaments, Curtis Cups, whatever it is, to professional events, the women’s game in general, we all feel a huge responsibility to help promote them, but promote them in a manner that appreciate their skill and their talents as much as anything else.

JERRY FOLTZ: I’d like to piggy-back on Karen’s comments really quick. Not only do I agree with them, it’s one thing to want to present it in the most fresh and entertaining fashion, but in doing so, not to take away from the competition, not to take away from describing the golf the way it should be described.

Because the credibility doesn’t come from us telling you how great they are. The credibility comes from them showing you how great they are, and all we can do is set it up and describe the action.

They should be appreciated for their skill more than anything else, for how incredible they are, how tough they are down the stretch, so many of them. If we become cheerleaders for women’s sports and women’s golf, that becomes quite transparent.

I think the growth of the fan base comes from people appreciating the quality of play, and we can sit here because each one of us will tell you how great the quality of play is until we’re blue in the face, but until you understand what goes into these shots, what goes into their emotions, what goes into winning a major championship against probably the deepest pool of talent women’s golf has ever seen, that’s where you become a fan.

That’s where you fall in love with the players and the women’s game. Because it’s a different game than the men’s, but in many, many aspects, they play a far better game than the men because they have to.

I think that comes through in our broadcast as much as anything else, and I think that’s why year over year for the last 12 years the ratings have continually ticked up for the LPGA Tour on GOLF Channel, NBC and on the other various NBCU platforms.

TOM ABBOTT: I think when you look at sports broadcasting in general, it’s very rare that one network or broadcast partner has exclusive access and rights to every event.

That’s kind of the case for NBC Sports Group with the LPGA. As a group, we do pretty much every single event that there is, especially from the U.S. As a group we don’t tend to do the events in Asia, but they air on our network, but all of the domestic events and those in Europe we are part of.

And so I think you do have a connection with the product maybe more so than some other groups who don’t do every event, and I think in terms of taking responsibility, I don’t think it’s necessarily our responsibility to push up the purses.

I think we need to concentrate on what we’re doing as broadcasters, but I think we certainly feel a responsibility in entertaining the audience and producing a great product, and I feel like as a group, we do that.

I think we do have a pretty strong connection to this Tour, and I think when you look at some of the opportunities that the players have on the women’s side compared to the men’s, it does trouble you a little bit.

I think this week is very important in terms of purse equality and the players earning a lot of money like the men do. I think we’re happy that this is moving in the right direction, and I don’t think we can take credit for that in any way, but I think it certainly is nice to know that we’re involved in this movement as the purses begin to tick up.

I think it’s going to be a very important week, and I know as a group we’re going to be very excited to see how that affects the play. This is going to be a huge amount of money for players coming down the stretch.

The majority of the top players, I’m not sure that will change their mindset, but there are definitely going to be players competing on Sunday who this is going to be kind of a life-changing day for them, so I think that’ll be very interesting as part of the storyline.

Q. I have an Annika question. I was just hoping one or several of you could put in perspective how difficult it is to come back to a major after such a long layoff, and then maybe weigh in on what you expect from Annika next week. Thank you.

KAREN STUPPLES: For me with Annika, I’ve had a lot of time off away from golf, as well, and so for me, to mentally prepare myself if I was to go and try and do something like Annika is doing now, it would be almost like the mountain would almost seem a little too high.

I watch the women play week in, week out now and their golf games are just ridiculously good. The increase in talent level and depth on Tour has exponentially grown since Annika stepped away and since I stepped away. It just continues year in, year out to get better.

With that in mind, knowing that you’re up against competition that’s deeper than you’ve ever competed against, I’m not taking away from her competitors in their prime. You think of the Se Ri Paks and the Karrie Webbs, and we can’t take anything away from them.

But in terms of depth of competition, it’s not really much of a comparison. It’s just so deep right now.

I do think that she is super competitive and always has been, and she throws herself at it like nobody else would, but you cannot escape Mother Nature and age, and she knows she’s at a disadvantage now.

She doesn’t hit it as she used to hit it distance-wise. She’s going to be behind a lot. It’s going to be a little tougher for her in terms of putting that scoring in. She’s a full-time mom and she’s a businesswoman and she’s got everything else going on, as well.

She’s not only trying to compete against players that all they do is just play golf, but she has a whole other life away from golf, as well. So she’s going to try and channel that to try and compete, to try and play.

And she’s been very good recently about keeping everything in perspective and about how she goes about it, and I think people genuinely are curious and interested in how she does it.

But to me, the fact that she’s trying and that she wants to do this speaks a testament to her competitive nature and how much she wants to do this for her kids and for her family, just to prove to them, again, look, you can achieve anything if you put your mind to it.

It’s a pretty big deal what she’s doing right now.

KAY COCKERILL: I think about Helen Alfredsson who won the Senior Women’s Open at Pine Needles, and she did not take the opportunity to play in the Women’s Open after that, although she had a spot. That’s an example of just knowing her own parameters.

You know how much more difficult it is to try to go out and compete with 20-year olds and teens on a golf course that’s several hundred yards longer than you’re playing in the Senior Women’s Open.

But Annika always has a game plan and a strategy for whatever she does. She is the best at preparing for things.

I think she’s going to prepare the best she can. She’s played a few events — few LPGA events and celebrity events — and gotten a little bit of competition under her belt. I think it’s very brave of her to tee it up, and I admire her for doing it.

MORGAN PRESSEL: Yeah, I agree. Just even seeing what she did after 13 years off from competitive golf, to come back and win the Women’s Senior Open last year, it’s truly incredible. She was working hard to get to that point of teeing up there; that was a huge goal for her. Don’t doubt her in any fashion. She has really been working hard leading up to this, like Kay said, getting some experience under her belt, and I’m sure there’s a bit of nostalgia returning to a special place. Maybe if it was at a different venue she would potentially feel differently.

But I think it’s really neat, especially for her kids, Will and Ava, to watch her compete on the biggest stage again, and I think it’s going to be fun to watch.

Her making the cut at Lake Nona was just a really impressive feat. She definitely does not hit it as far as she did when she was on top of her game. So the length, I think, will be a bit of a struggle. But she is a competitor like maybe nobody we’ve ever seen in the women’s game, so it’ll be fun to watch her compete again.

JERRY FOLTZ: I’ll add just a really quick comment for you. Annika to me is one of the most impressive athletes I’ve ever been around on and off the sporting field.

The curiosity for me isn’t how she’s going to make the cut this week, because she is going to make the cut. She doesn’t know how not to. Unlike my playing career, Annika doesn’t make plane reservations on Saturday morning in advance. She will find a way to be there and make her family proud, and you never know, she might make a little noise — not a lot I don’t think, but she’ll figure out a way to get it done, play the weekend, and prove to us once again, like Morgan said, how competitive and determined she is and how when she sets her mind to something, she does it.

This is a huge goal for her, and I’m so happy that she’s playing.

Q. For the players on Tour this year who haven’t played well up until now, haven’t made much money but qualified their way into the U.S. Women’s Open, how valuable of an opportunity does this major and its $10 million purse present to turn their season around not just for CME points and status but just economically, as well?

KAY COCKERILL: Yeah, it’s huge. You look back, and when this championship — when I first started working it in ’95 or ’96 when it was here, what, the purse was $1.2 million, winner’s share $212. Now $10 million purse, $1.8 million to the winner.

I think Tom said it earlier, it’s going to be interesting to see how these women handle it down the stretch. Even if you’re not going to win the tournament, finishing top 20, just making the cut and having that amount of money in your bank account is going to be huge, life-changing, like Tom said.

But what I’ve noticed is these women, when you give them the stage, a grand stage to compete on, a great golf course, and you put cameras on and then you boost the purse, they rise to the occasion.

In the U.S. Open, the USGA events, always there’s this feeling of it’s very democratic; everyone earned a way to get in there and everyone is deserving of that spot. It’s almost like you can come into it as someone who’s a, quote, no-name and feel like I’m on equal ground; anything is possible this week; let’s start from ground zero here and see who can come out the best.

I think for a lot of these players who haven’t done anything, shoot, a top 25, top-10 finish would be like winning.

MORGAN PRESSEL: Yeah, Kay, I agree with that. It’s truly life-changing. I think about it even more so than players with LPGA membership, but on mini-Tours or on the Epson Tour certainly, who have never had the opportunity to play for any kind of a large purse, let alone this kind of money.

And it’s a hard life playing the mini-Tours, especially in the women’s game. There’s not very much money, often driving to events, often wondering where their next paycheck is going to come from.

To think that they have the opportunity next week to post a top 20 and just really make life a little bit easier for themselves while they are grinding to make it to the LPGA Tour, because obviously they have the talent to do it — I mean, I watched my sister play on the Epson Tour for many years, and it’s a tough life, and with it, like Kay said, the qualification process, these women earn their spot.

Now they have the opportunity of a lifetime.

KAREN STUPPLES: Well, honestly, the thought of a $10 million purse just absolutely blows my mind, to be perfectly honest. I don’t even know how to think about money in those terms and what it means going into your bank account, what the potential is there in one big chunk, even for like a 30th place or a 40th place.

I mean, I can’t even conceptualize it in my own mind. To me, this is just such a big step. I mean, I can’t even wrap my head around it.

But I will tell you this: When I was in my first year on Tour and I was just trying to keep my Tour card, I was trying to just do well, I had my first ever top 10 in Springfield at the State Farm Classic, and I earned $22,000.

I felt like I had won the jackpot lottery. Literally I felt like I was the richest person alive because I had never seen that kind of money going into my bank account ever. And the total purse at Springfield was $750,000.

So to think about the total purse being $10 million, I just can’t wrap my head around what a difference this could possibly make for somebody. I can’t even properly speak about it because it’s just — I mean, my goodness, what a move this is.

Q. Morgan, just wanted to know what stands out the most when you think about your experiences at Pine Needles, particularly competing so young in 2001 and then being in contention Sunday in ’07.

MORGAN PRESSEL: Yeah, I mean, they were both very special experiences for me, playing in 2001, that was really my first opportunity. I had only been playing golf for four years. I had watched certainly my idols on TV.

I think actually one of the first events I really remember watching was the Women’s Open when Se Ri Pak won at Blackwolf Run against Jenny Chuasiriporn in a playoff. I just remember being glued to the television for that.

So to be out there as a young kid, and I remember there being rain delays and I didn’t want to leave the locker room because I was just so star struck being just even in the same room as all of these people that I had watched on TV.

And for me that was life changing because that was the moment where I decided that this is what I wanted to do. I’m going to do everything that I can to play golf for a living, and that really was the moment where it really became my dream to play on the LPGA Tour.

Then in 2007, I was right there in contention coming down the stretch. To watch my friend Cristie (Kerr) win, Lorena (Ochoa), of course, just doing Lorena things, playing incredible golf. Definitely disappointing for me. I’d say it took me a little bit of time to kind of collect myself and get over that one.

But two completely different experiences in my two times competing at Pine Needles, but it’s just a really special place and I’m excited to go back.

Q. This is a question for the group. What kind of test do you think Pine Needles will provide for these players, and does the course favor any type of specific skill set over another?

KAY COCKERILL: I think ball-striking first and foremost because the greens are so severe. It’s not that demanding off the tee. There’s some tight holes, but you have a little bit of leeway off the tee, but it’s about iron play and being really precise on your approaches, otherwise you’ve got these edges of the greens that just melt off.

Your ball doesn’t just go off the edge of the green, it gets taken 20, 30 yards away. Someone that’s struggling with ball-striking is going to have to have a really great short game, and we’re talking total creativity, being able to putt off the greens, hybrid off the greens, hit lob shots off of tight lies.

I just think ball-striking is number one first and foremost and a great short game. Usually, like most USGA championship courses, they demand everything out of your game. But if you’re striking it well, you’re going to have a good chance to win.

MORGAN PRESSEL: Yeah, I would definitely echo that. I mean, like you said, a USGA championship, it demands literally everything. You can’t be weak really in any aspect of your game that week.

But I think the number one thing that comes to my mind when I think about Pine Needles is creativity. Creativity around the greens, creativity to hit different types of shots into the greens to be able to hold the greens wherever the hole location may be.

And I just think somebody, as usual, with a hot putter is going to do very well, because the greens are very severe and you have to even be creative on the putting surface to see the lines properly, to see the speed.

I feel like U.S. Opens more than any event demand a good five-foot putter, somebody who’s really making those clutch par saves coming down the stretch. Those are kind of the things that I really think about when I think about Pine Needles.

KAREN STUPPLES: Jumping off of Morgan there, Cristie Kerr says that she did it by making a ton of putts, and she was making 30-foot par saves. So just to add a little bit of context to Morgan’s comment there.

I would also say that you definitely need an ability to hit your targets with distance control. Everything has to be so precise there. You’ve got to really be disciplined with your targets, and you’ve got to have the ability to produce the shot when you need to.

With regards to the short game, I go back — obviously I’ve not been to Pine Needles — but I go back to Pinehurst, and I remember watching Martin Kaymer win the U.S. Open at Pinehurst.

He didn’t do anything but take a putter from around the greens. He had one shot and he had practiced it all week, and he used it every single chance he had an opportunity. He didn’t try and play 15 different shots or try and practice 15 different shots. He perfected the one shot, so every time he was in that position, he knew what he had to do and he did it. Sometimes he had to play away from the flags because of it, but the overall idea was that he was able to achieve doing that.

I think players need to go into this week with a game plan. They need to be very strategic, and they need to be not emotionally connected to the outcome. They’ve got to be somewhat detached from a bad bounce or a bad break or a tough spot. That comes down to that mental discipline that you expect from a U.S. Open.

All these qualities when you think about the winners here, Annika, Karrie Webb, Cristie Kerr, they check every single box that the three of us have just talked about.

THE MODERATOR: Thank you everybody for joining, both in the media and to our commentators.

Filed Under: Golf, NBC, transcript, Uncategorized

TRANSCRIPT – 2022 INDIANAPOLIS 500 CONFERENCE CALL

May 24, 2022 By admin

Tuesday, May 24, 2022

Mike Tirico

Danica Patrick

Dale Earnhardt Jr.

Leigh Diffey

Townsend Bell

James Hinchcliffe

THE MODERATOR: Good afternoon, everybody. Thank you for joining us today for our media conference call to preview Sunday’s 106th Running of the Indianapolis 500. Joining us today is host Mike Tirico and guest analysts Danica Patrick and Dale Earnhardt Jr., as well as our lead INDYCAR race team of Leigh Diffey, Townsend Bell and James Hinchcliffe.

We’ll begin with opening remarks. We’ll start with Mike Tirico.

MIKE TIRICO: Good afternoon, everyone. Great to be on the call, and great to be with our INDYCAR group one more time. It has been three wonderful experiences for me. I’m looking forward to the fourth for me personally. The entirety of NBC Sports, it’s so great to bookend the month of May with two of the biggest races in America, the Kentucky Derby at the start of the month, then the Indianapolis 500 at the end of the month. These massive crowds, traditions that are over a century long in our country.

For me personally, it’s great to be back working with Danica and Dale Jr. I’ve had a chance to do this a few times. It will be nice to enjoy the weekend at the Brickyard, back to the way it was the first time there in 2019 with a full crowd.

Obviously no one there in 2020. Limited crowd in ’21. To be back to full steam like we’ve seen at other events adds to the ambience, experience and the television broadcast as well. Looking forward to being with everyone and being back at the Brickyard. Happy to answer any questions, but I’m sure they’re going to be for the experts.

With that, I’ll kick it over to Danica.

DANICA PATRICK: Thanks, Mike.

Well, great to be back with you, Mike, Dale, the whole crew that does the whole season. I have so much fun when I do this race. I’m already back in Indianapolis as of yesterday. Just driving around, seeing all the checkered flags, Indianapolis Motor Speedway flags out in front of houses, the city is in the spirit.

Even better of course, everyone that wants to come can come to the race as we have full grandstands for the first time in a couple years.

On track, it’s one of the most exciting years. The story line of the young guns, then the old guard, is still going. Even more dramatic right now with the polesitter of Scott (Dixon) being the fastest qualifier in history. But then, of course, the young guys are right there. It’s going to be another super exciting Indy 500 I’m sure.

Can Helio (Castroneves) get his fifth? Obviously that would be dramatic. Being there for when he won his fourth, it was a really fun experience. It was cool to be able to watch that happen. He’s such a good guy.

There’s just lots that’s ready to unfold. What I’ve always loved about the Indy 500 is that there are so many opportunities for different endings. That’s why, from a driver’s perspective, it’s such an alluring race, so sought after. There are so many drivers that can walk away and say, It could have been me if it had just gone this way. It’s the longest, most amount of pit stops, most amount of things that can happen.

We’ll all be ready to report on it and get that to the fans. Just happy to be back. I think from here, turning it over to Dale.

DALE EARNHARDT JR.: I’m excited to get the ask from NBC to return to Indy and work the race. It’s hard to explain to anybody what it’s like to be there in person on that day. I’ve watched that race my whole life, and most of the time was watching it from the garage at Charlotte Motor Speedway, like the rest of the NASCAR industry. We all stopped everything we were doing in that moment and tried to get every minute of viewership we could to see how that was going to play out.

I’d always grown up in the stockcar world; that world had captured my heart. When I went to the Indy 500 for the very first time, it’s not even close what that race is like in person compared to anything I had ever experienced in my career.

I’m bringing my wife this year. I just cannot wait for her to see the size of this event, to feel the tradition that you feel, as the pre-race is sort of playing itself out, it’s so special.

I’m so thankful to be asked to come back. Traditionally in these type of events I would be working with Rut during the pre-race, but I’ll be on the pit box for the pre-race show with Townsend. I’ve really enjoyed working alongside him. It’s going to be fun to do that again.

During the race, I’ll be up there with Danica and Mike, like I’ve done in the past. That will be a lot of fun when they drop in to get our take on what we’re watching. That’s such a great location on pit road. You really get a sense of the speed and the energy. You’re in great proximity to the crowd itself. You’re taking all the things that are happening at the racetrack during the event. You’re in close proximity to everything. You really get pretty fired up. Just really makes for an enthusiastic show.

I’m excited to get into town. It’s going to be an awesome week. Can’t wait to see Diffey and Townsend and everybody. Haven’t seen some of these folks in quite a while.

LEIGH DIFFEY: Dale, you speak about the feeling, you’re bringing Amy this year, what she’s going to experience. There are so many great story lines throughout the field, which we could point to in any direction. But I want to bring everybody back to the fans.

We experienced the most bizarre race and sporting event ever in 2020 with nobody here. This year, there’s going to be in excess of 300,000 people here. It’s the biggest sporting day, single-day crowd, in the world. We cannot lose sight of that because having done Olympic Summer Games, Olympic Winter Games, I went to Super Bowl 50. Everybody on this call has their favorite or a meaningful sporting event. We cannot lose sight of the fact this is the biggest single-day sporting crowd in the world. Nowhere assembles a crowd like Indianapolis.

The other day our new teammate and our buddy James Hinchcliffe and I experienced this, on qualifying weekend, trying to walk from the pagoda to Gasoline Alley was a challenge. There were that many people there on qualifying day, which has not been a rich tradition for a number of years. It used to be back in the day.

For some reason, maybe people are just enjoying going to live sporting events again. We’re back. The world is back. I know there’s still some health challenges. But the feeling this year just seems something different. It’s awesome. We had a terrific GMR Grand Prix of Indy. We had the most mesmerizing qualifying weekend with the fastest ever qualifying field in more than a hundred years. There’s so many special elements to this weekend that we should and rightfully so be excited about. T-Bell?

TOWNSEND BELL: Thanks, Diff. Great opening remarks by everyone. To drill down even further on the energy and the excitement and the size of the crowd, as you guys were speaking, I was thinking to myself, Why is that? Why is this the biggest live sporting event in the world? It’s called “The Greatest Spectacle in Racing” for a reason.

Ever since I was 11 years old and came to this race in 1986, the spectacle was twofold: it was the foundation of insane, regard-breaking speeds, then competition on race day. People showed up for really I think those two reasons, in addition to being an amazing celebration of our country, Memorial Day weekend.

For many years it felt like the first part of that equation, the speed part, kind of flat lined. I think that Diff’s observation of the crowd this past weekend, they’re back because, yes, things are opening up again, everybody wants to get out, but they’re back for a reason. They’re back to seeing speeds that are really pushing the limit again. That is the bedrock for me of the Indy 500.

Conor Daly clocked a back straightaway speed in practice on Friday touching on 245 miles an hour, which is just awesome. You think about Scott Dixon’s qualifying run, the fastest polesitter we’ve ever had, at an average speed — average speed — of 234 miles an hour.

The energy for me, the passion, is just at an all-time high. I just cannot wait for this weekend because the cars are going faster, and that matters. Then the competition side of that, this weekend, on Sunday, I think we can expect a huge amount of urgency from some of the cars that didn’t qualify as well as they wanted because I just get the sense you can’t afford to sit and ride around this year like you have in years past.

If you’re somebody like Josef Newgarden or Scott McLaughlin, with fast race cars, but maybe not the fastest qualifying car, I think you’re going to see some urgency in the beginning. It should just be a fantastic race right from the get-go.

Thrilled to be back. Excited for that foundation and that core attribute of speed to really be back in our sport in a fantastic way. Also love having James as part of the team. It gives us really current experience and a lot of key insights that I’m thankful for.

James, take it away.

JAMES HINCHCLIFFE: Thank you, Townsend.

For me, it’s obviously a huge honor and a privilege to be asked to be part of the NBC team for this event. Bit of a different seat for me from the last few years. That transition so far this year has been very smooth, been a lot of fun. Such a great team with us at the racetrack, back at Stamford that makes this all happen. It’s been a real joy to be part of that team.

For me, the month of May, specifically race day at the Indy 500, no doubt some of the most special memories of my career and of my life. But also some of the most stressful times you’re ever going to spend behind the wheel of a race car or getting ready to get into a car.

I’m so excited to kind of see from this new perspective now with the knowledge that I have from the last 10 or so years of being in the sport. Now getting not to just witness it from the outside, but share that experience with so many people.

One of my favorite things has always been educating people about INDYCAR racing and what we do. Now we have this phenomenal platform to tell the world what they’re watching these drivers do. An incredible feat that every one of these 33 drivers is taking on Sunday. Just trying to make sure we get that point across to the viewers is an important one.

Like I said, just really happy to be part of the team. Really appreciate the opportunity. Can’t wait to follow along on all the story lines that were touched on, talked about, see how this plays out.

Q. Dale, it seems like some of your best Dale Jr. Download interviews are when you get together with INDYCAR drivers and legends, seems like you get immersed into their story. As a fellow racer, you’re able to appreciate what they’ve done and how they do it. How much has Dale Jr. Download, along with your curiosity about the Indianapolis 500 as a youngster, really helped you get immersed for this role to be part of the telecast?

DALE EARNHARDT JR.: I think doing the podcast and the show gave me a little bit more confidence as I do it, as an interviewer, challenged me to sort of get outside of that comfort zone and interview not only non-NASCAR drivers and individuals, but non-racing, non-sports individuals.

We have had a lot of fun talking to a lot of the INDYCAR drivers because each driver’s path to where they are and where they will be this Sunday is so unique to themselves. In other forms of motorsport or in stockcars, the paths are maybe not predictable, but unremarkable. That’s not the case with a lot of these INDYCAR drivers.

Their route, there’s never one the same, no two are the same. They travel all across the world seeking opportunities in racing in different countries to eventually somehow find their way here, end up here, with this opportunity to race in INDYCAR and in the Indy 500. It’s really compelling to hear how they made those decisions.

I think INDYCAR has some of the most interesting and entertaining, fun personalities in the drivers. And they are different than what I’m used to experiencing.

There’s a difference in approach to being accessible that these drivers have; the way that they need to be accessible in their series, at the racetrack, to the fans; the way I think the INDYCAR drivers all seem to recognize the importance of that and all seem to work together to push not only themselves but the organization, their sport, forward.

It’s a fun thing to be around. Yeah, we have a lot of fun when we get those guys in the room. Certainly makes us much bigger fans of not only the series but the drivers individually. It’s pretty cool to get to know some of them.

Can’t wait to run into a couple of those guys this weekend.

Q. How excited have you been watching your former Hendrick teammate do so well this month?

DALE EARNHARDT JR.: I’ve been really excited for Jimmie. I was talking about that today on the podcast. I’m a little bit nervous because he seems to be pushing to the max. Every time he’s on the track, it’s like he is on the edge. Nobody’s going to reach out and tell a seven-time champion, with all the success he’s had in his career, what to do, how to drive, how to approach anything.

I’m just pulling for him to have a great experience in the race and have a result that he can be happy with and smile about in the end.

I am full of anxiety that he’s going to push, push, push too hard, and somehow that might put him in a bad situation. He’s gotten so, so close a few times already this month to some bad situations. But he’s a pro. You trust that he knows what he’s out there doing, understanding the limits of the car.

Q. Leigh, given Formula 1’s growth in the United States, I’m curious what opportunities and challenges you see for INDYCAR moving forward.

LEIGH DIFFEY: Thanks for being on and thanks for the question.

Look, I think it’s a massive positive just for the sport. We are super proud of the production values and the product that we put out for the Indy 500. Actually, frankly, for the entire NTT INDYCAR SERIES.

Part of the family is Sky Sports under the umbrella of Comcast. What Sky does for Formula 1 is very good. It’s a great product. Then you go to more poignantly about your point, sport, Formula 1, its success, which the explosion here in the U.S. can be pretty much directly attributed to the Netflix Drive to Survive multiple episodes and series.

I like the fact that it has been able to attract not necessarily motorsports fans to the sport. We don’t need to really dig into F1 or INDYCAR or NASCAR, whatever it might be. It’s just the sport holistically people are interested in. We’re seeing that. Our ratings are up on INDYCAR. The beginning of the year with FOX for NASCAR before we take over, ratings are up. Formula 1 is enjoying a really good team. The IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar series, which we air on NBC Sports, is enjoying a terrific year.

I don’t know why, but if it is attributable to Formula 1, let’s ride off it, let’s enjoy it. Right now the sport of motorsport is enjoying a really positive time. As I said in my opening remarks, just the crowd at Indy here for qualifying weekend was fantastic.

People are jacked. People are engaged. People are enjoying the sport of motorsports. While we’re in this, because people are all too quick to talk about the glory days, the golden days, back when, blah, blah, blah, maybe the glory days and golden days are just now, so let’s enjoy this moment.

Q. Townsend, James and Danica. As the three on the call who have competed in this race, we saw some of the fastest qualifying speeds in history last weekend. How do you think that affects what we might see in the race? Do you think it favors a specific team, veterans over rookies? What do you think on that end?

TOWNSEND BELL: Yeah, it was awesome to see the speeds up. I don’t know that I could put my finger on any one reason why it’s just a little bit quicker this year. The car obviously has evolved, the engine manufacturers between Chevy and Honda are in a fierce competition.

But mainly I think it’s the track penetrant has also made a little bit of a difference. The biggest thing I think it leads to is on race day maybe we’ll see some fuel consumption that is a little bit more aggressive than we have had in years past. Anytime you’re going faster, you’re burning more fuel. Potentially it’s going to shorten up the stints a little bit and open up the strategies just a little bit more.

Maybe some teams are going to elect to make one extra pit stop than we have seen historically. I’m not exactly sure the reason why, but I’m happy the speeds are up, I think it’s that much more exciting.

JAMES HINCHCLIFFE: I’ll jump in here and say I agree with Townsend. It’s hard to put your finger on what’s causing those speeds. I don’t really mind why it is, I just love that it’s happening.

For the race itself, I think when we went back to race running on Monday, the pace that we saw from cars running up front was probably a lot closer to what we saw in race trim last year compared to the gap that we’re seeing in qualifying trim.

My hope is that, as Townsend alluded to the penetrant, maybe it is adding a little more grip. Maybe that makes following a little bit easier, which hopefully will make passing a little more frequent. Either way, with the fastest field in history, you know it’s a close competition guys fighting out there to make up every spot every chance they get.

I think the race is going to be just as exciting as what we’ve seen the last few seasons.

DANICA PATRICK: From my perspective, I think it’s just really mostly exciting from a fan perspective. It adds drama and excitement to know that we have essentially, like you say, I don’t know if it’s considered the fastest field in history, but we have at least the fastest qualifier. I think that’s just great to tell the fans.

Speed is exciting to people.

As far as what it means inside the car, we’ve been creeping around these speeds for a while. It’s kind of just a little bit more. So I think probably the guys had a better perspective on that, having been more in the thick of it this year, having obviously been recently in the car.

I mean, fuel could be a thing, sure. I remember driving at 230-some miles an hour versus 200 miles an hour, you got to turn the wheel a little bit slower. Just that little bit could make it a little bit more exciting for the drivers. By ‘exciting’, I mean a handful.

Q. Townsend, James and Danica, as the three folks that have raced with Scott at different portions of his career, can you give any sort of perspective of what you feel like finally being able to break through and get that notorious second win at the Indy 500 after 14 years might mean for him.

TOWNSEND BELL: Thanks for the question.

I raced against Scott starting in 2000, I think was my first year in Indy Lights. It was clear back then that Scott was special in a number of ways, particularly his race craft, his ability to compartmentalize what would normally be a range of emotions that I think any human would normally go through during a race, whether that’s exhilaration or frustration or anything in between, he seemed to really manage that well.

When I think about what it takes to be successful at Indianapolis, being able to compartmentalize emotion throughout the race is really important. He’s done it better than anyone. That’s why he’s a six-time champion.

Sure he has one Indy 500 win, but I would put that mostly down to circumstantial. He’s been in the hunt so many times. He’s been at the front so many times. I think we ran the stats the other day. The Andretti family, with Mario, Michael and Marco, 70 total starts, one win. We’re talking about a group of names there that have always been competitive at the Speedway.

I’m going to put it down mostly to circumstance.

Now, if there was ever a year that I think Scott has a better chance than others, it might be this year. His team, Chip Ganassi Racing, all month or all week, if you will, practice and qualifying, we have circled those cars as standouts in terms of their balance, speed, how they handle dirty air, all of that.

They seem to be a cut above everyone. Scott, on that team, is the strongest driver at Indianapolis. He’s got a great shot this year.

JAMES HINCHCLIFFE: Kind of following up on Townsend’s point there, it wouldn’t surprise me to learn deep down part of what motivates Scott to still be an INDYCAR driver, other than the obvious, is that second win at the 500. Six championships in, I know how much a second win would mean to him. I can’t help but think that’s part of the reason he’s still doing this full-time and why the drivers push yourself to be competitive exists.

The big challenge this year, as Townsend said, are his teammates. I think in years past, Scott has kind of always been the clear favorite on the team, the clear fastest on the team. This year has been a little bit more of a struggle for him. Even the start of the month of May wasn’t as smooth as we’re used to seeing. It wasn’t really until Saturday morning where we saw the unbelievable pace. Sunday morning actually where we saw the big pace come out of the 9 car.

While I agree that he has a tremendous shot because of the dominance we’ve seen of the team so far, his biggest competitors unfortunately are in the same stable. You look at what Alex Palou did last year, Tony Kanaan, Marcus Ericsson has been quick, then of course Jimmie having run more 500-mile races than the rest of the 32 drivers he’s racing against Sunday combined have done. We’ll see what plays out. But he is definitely going to be one to watch.

DANICA PATRICK: Yeah, James, I think that’s a really good point, just the struggles that he’s had. He hasn’t had the best start to the season this year.

What I find just so impressive and admirable and rare is how long he’s been at it and how good he is, how much passion. I think that’s a part that’s amazing, just the real passion and drive for it after that much time.

To be struggling, then to sort of end up in the place right now where he’s the fastest qualifier, that drive is still there. I think that’s just rare. It’s exciting to watch that.

As you guys have pointed out, he’s been in the mix so many times, like it just seemed like a clear favorite to win so many times, leading so many laps. I would be really curious to ask him, like, what fuels him, what motivates him. There’s clearly some magic there because he just keeps coming (laughter).

Q. Danica, obviously as the pioneer for females in auto racing, then last year you had Simona De Silvestro run the Indy 500, and it was announced earlier that an all-female INDYCAR team led by Beth Paretta with Simona as the driver is going to compete in three races this year. Danica, having run your last Indy 500 a couple years ago, where is your evaluation of auto racing as far as accessibility for drivers, owners, pit crew members? How much ground has been made, and what ground is yet to be made up?

DANICA PATRICK: Thanks for your question.

Just something unique about me, I’m just not one of those girl athletes that is trying to point out all the girl athlete stuff. I competed against the guys, and I used my femininity to my comfort level, to the extent it helps me in my career with sponsors and really just, honestly, express that side of me.

So I’m not here to – how do I say it – try to promote it. But I think if there are women drivers and pit crew and engineers and personnel that are qualified for the job, they sure as heck should be doing it.

So I think there are more opportunities than ever, to be honest. I don’t think it’s less. I don’t think it’s harder. I think it’s easier, as those that came before me, and then myself, and so on. It clears the path.

Also it makes people want to find something rare again. Women are still not common. So, yeah, I mean, I think there are probably some aspects within a full women’s team of physically it’s going to be hard to be as fast as guys on a pit stop, things like that. I think like pure physicality does play into it.

The car was an extension of me, but it wasn’t just me. So I think that kind of bridged the gap between the difference. But all in all, there are more opportunities I think now than ever. It will be interesting to see how they do. I hope they’re competitive.

Q. Dale Jr., just as sort of a crossover with NASCAR fans, like everyone wants your opinion on things. If you could make a prediction for who you think will win Sunday’s race?

DALE EARNHARDT JR.: Oh, my gosh.

Well, I think as some people on this call said before, the Ganassi car has a lot of speed. (Scott) Dixon being fast, being smart, being such a great talent, probably is putting himself in that conversation as one of the favorites.

Honestly, though, I think Jimmie (Johnson) could surprise a lot of people. I think that he made a good account of himself at Texas. This whole month, he was able to have so much time with the car and the team at the facility, sort of move beyond the enormity of the moment. I know that’s going to be nearly impossible when he walks out on the grid for the race to sort of be beyond the enormity of the moment or the weight of it. I really think Jimmie could do really, really well.

Outside of that, the one thing that I kind of like about this race and where the series is, where the pace is throughout the field, it’s really anybody’s race. At some point somebody could be there that maybe surprises us a little bit or somebody we might not tend to expect to be there. The potential for that shocker is always there.

I guess it depends on how the pace goes for the race, how hard these guys run. If fuel mileage is not an issue or if there’s guys that are trying to work themselves into a certain pit strategy where they have to run a certain pace, we’ve seen that in the past. We’ve seen other teams run hard all day long, not worry about fuel mileage, dictate from the front of the race what’s going on.

It will be interesting to see how they approach it, how the different teams approach it, how the drivers approach it as far as that goes.

I don’t know. I would probably put my money on Dixon if it was me. I’d have a little bit on Jimmie, as well.

LEIGH DIFFEY: Dale, it just blows me away that more people aren’t talking about what Jimmie Johnson has already accomplished. So this Sunday he has the opportunity to become just the third person ever — ever — to win the Daytona 500 and the Indianapolis 500, along with A.J. Foyt and Mario Andretti.

People are saying, Oh, yeah, Jimmie is in the field… They should be talking about him. He qualified in the Fast 12. He had the most miraculous save in qualifying that you’re ever going to see at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway. He doesn’t need to do this, he wants to do this.

His results on the road and street courses have not been what he wants. They’ve been pretty disappointing in his own words. But on the oval, he has done more 500-mile races than the entire field put together. It staggers me why more people aren’t talking about Jimmie. That’s to his benefit. If he sneaks in there and does this, we’re all going to witness a special piece of history.

I think we should all acknowledge what he is doing and what he’s done, what he continues to do when he doesn’t need to do it. He could be sitting on a beach somewhere, but he’s not. He wants to do this because it was his childhood dream to be an INDYCAR driver. His hero, Rick Mears, and his dirt bike hero, Ricky Johnson, have motivated him to get to this point.

People talk with such reverence about Dale Earnhardt Sr. and Richard Petty, and Jimmie has the same amount of NASCAR championships.

We shouldn’t forget this moment in motorsports history of what he is doing. Shouldn’t be so blasé about the fact that he’s in the field. This is a guy in his mid 40s and didn’t need to do this, but he is doing it. On the ovals, he’s excelling. He blew past Scott Dixon at Texas Motor Speedway to go into the top five. The team called him back because he had some fuel issues, so he finished sixth. He went past a six-time champion and a guy who has excelled at Texas Motor Speedway and the guy who sits on pole position for this weekend.

We have to take the blinkers off and acknowledge what this quietly spoken hero has achieved already.

Q. Mike, Danica and Dale. Could you expand on how you view your respective roles on the broadcast this weekend?

MIKE TIRICO: I’ll be happy to start. It’s the same thing like any other event that I have the pleasure of hosting. I think it is to welcome us on the air, set the scene, big-picture perspective of what’s going on, some resets within the broadcast. Also all the buildup.

I’ve been lucky enough to cover about everything here in sports in the last few years. I can’t think of a more tradition-filled, dynamic buildup to an event than what we have at Indy. To be right there on the track as all of that is building up, moving around that area with the driver introductions, back home again in Indiana, national anthem, all of that, especially on Memorial Day weekend, it’s part of the essence and great tradition that everyone has been talking about.

My job is pretty simple: to set up those moments and our analysts who are with us, elicit the information that lets the person who is watching feel a little bit more close to the event and a little bit more knowledgeable about what’s going on.

Once the race starts, sit with Dale and Danica and get their responses to what they’re seeing from our perspective.

DANICA PATRICK: Mike, I don’t know if it’s a simple job, my friend. You make it look simple, but you have a big job to carry the broadcast and build the excitement up.

I feel like my role is to help give some perspective from what it would be like if you were a driver, the whole experience of the Indy 500, what it’s like, the ambience, what it’s like the night before, the morning of, going to intros, being on the track, what are you thinking about, what kind of things can occur in the race, what is your perspective. Just everything from a driver’s perspective is really what I’m there to help educate the fans on.

DALE EARNHARDT JR.: I think for me, I have motorsports knowledge, but I don’t go to every single INDYCAR race. I didn’t grow up going to those races. A lot of things that I’m seeing, questions are instantly popping into your head about why did this happen this way, why did they choose to do this? Maybe I’m seeing or triggered by things or excited by something that someone who’s there every single day may take for granted.

I think just being curious and tapping into that curiosity, saying, Why did this happen? How come this was the decision made? A lot of times you end up asking the question that the viewer at home has in their own head. That’s kind of fun for me.

You got to embrace the fact that you’re not an expert. You do have questions and you would love to have some answers. I kind of enjoy that role, to be honest with you. When I’m put in these positions, it’s kind of fun. I’m there as a fan, there experiencing it as a fan. I’m sitting around people who have all these answers to the questions that are popping up into my head. I enjoy it. It’s a great way to see the race.

MIKE TIRICO: If I could tailgate on that answer for a second.

It’s a good point because events like the Kentucky Derby might be the only horse race people watch all year. The Indy 500 might be one of the few, if any, INDYCAR races that you watch all year. There are a lot of fans who are not the hardcores, who are week in, week out watching.

To have us on the show, the pre-race show, some perspective, it’s welcoming to the viewers because, my goodness, Diff and Hinch, Hinch isn’t a rookie. If you watch any of the qualifying or practice, he’s awesome. Townsend, the rest of the crew. Rene, the producer, does such an incredible job. That group does terrific work.

If you watched the qualifying over the weekend, or even the practice show yesterday, such captivating stuff. Hopefully we can just add to it a little bit and help fill out the largesse of a show like this around our team that week in, week out is at the top of their game.

We’ve seen that the last three years during the 500. We’re excited we get to hang with our group, to be with Diff and everybody else who is the regular INDYCAR group for NBC, to get to work together.

It’s a fun experience for all of us, for sure.

Q. Danica, Townsend, Dale, about the record speeds this week, I’m kind of curious really in general how fast is too fast? I understand 230 mph in today’s car is different than 230 ten years ago. How do you weigh the record speeds versus the safety of the cars, being able to put up a banner saying record speeds? I bring in Dale also because I know he witnessed as a teenager NASCAR going through something similar with Bill Elliott doing 200-something miles an hour at Talladega.

TOWNSEND BELL: I think it’s a great question, and the simple answer is I don’t know, but I want to find out. I think that’s really the story of Indianapolis for over a hundred years, is just that question: How fast can they go? How much faster can they go? Where is the limit?

Whether that’s Indianapolis or chasing the speed of sound back in the ’50s and ’60s, that curiosity I think is the reason I fell in love with this race in the first place. It was mind-bending as a kid to go to Indianapolis and just couldn’t imagine these cars going over 200 miles an hour. When you see it in person or on TV, it really brings that fundamental question up.

I will say years ago we started to flirt with the driver’s physical limit at a race in Texas where there was a lot more banking on a shorter course, really high speeds. We started to get to a G-force level where the driver’s physical well-being was compromised a bit in terms of blackout and vertigo.

At Indianapolis there’s less banking in the corners. Right now, from a pure G-force standpoint, we are well below that threshold. I think there’s room to go there, and I’m fascinated to find out what that limit might be, and that’s why I watch, why I’m so curious.

DANICA PATRICK: I mean, of course I agree with Townsend. I don’t know. But I do know that the safety team and everybody that works hard on making sure that the cars are as safe as possible, there’s a meeting where we go over what has been done in the off-season to prepare for the next, what updates and tweaks are they making to make it more safe.

Obviously INDYCARS now have a windshield, which is something we never had for all of history until a couple of years ago. They’re always making improvements.

They would know from a technical standpoint, like, what speed does it take flight, when the car gets to a certain angle. They would know all that information.

What I guess I hope this would do, just the topic of it being the fastest qualifier in history at Indy, it was just like everybody out there racing is reminded of the sheer speed that’s out there.

Look, you can have a big crash at 100, 150, 200, 245 mph. You can have tragic accidents. But let’s hope it’s at least a little bit of a reminder of how fast they’re going out there and to respect each other, not do silly things.

We want an exciting race, but you can do that without touching wheels.

DALE EARNHARDT JR.: Townsend had some really, really great points.

I think a couple boxes need to always remain checked. A few of those being the safety of the fans attending the race. I think outside of making sure there’s no danger to people that are there to attend, things like that, I mean, there is no ‘too fast’.

As long as the cars are somewhat relatable in terms of how they perform, what makes them work, how drivers drive them. As long as the fans can kind of somewhat relate to what’s out there on the racetrack and what’s making that car go fast, they will always be kind of compelled to watch it. They’ll always be impressed with the speed.

Like you talked about, Bill Elliott’s run, even watching the cars at Indy this week, it’s incredible. We can relate to these cars. They’ve evolved, but the idea and the basic makeup of the machine is the same.

So as long as we can kind of maintain that connection, these things will always be amazing, and we will always be excited to watch them try to push them further and make them go faster.

Q. Dale, now that you’ve been to an Indy 500, is there any part of you that wishes maybe 15 or 20 years ago you could have found a way to run one?

DALE EARNHARDT JR.: Of course. Without a doubt there are regrets that I didn’t maybe try to figure out a way to be able to experience that once in my life.

So, yeah, when you’re watching a guy like Kyle Larson talk about it and consider it, you’re encouraged because you want to see him go out there and do it. Having my own experience, my own regret, I certainly think that a guy like Kyle Larson would have the same regrets if he doesn’t ever give it a shot.

I love the crossover. I love seeing other drivers from other disciplines go and try other things. My favorite crossover is absolutely NASCAR Cup and INDYCAR, the Daytona 500 and the Indy 500. Watching the drivers move back and forth between disciplines is pretty incredible.

But that ship has sailed. I’m 47. I’ll always wonder, I guess, what might have been, what I could have had the opportunity to do.

THE MODERATOR: Thank you so much. We really appreciate all of our speakers for taking part and all of the press for all of your questions. Thank you so much, everybody.

Again, Indy 500 on NBC, Peacock and Universo, Sunday, 11 a.m. Eastern.

Filed Under: Indy 500, IndyCar, NBC, transcript, Uncategorized

Monday Night Football’s Joe Buck and Troy Aikman Media Call

May 16, 2022 By admin

TRANSCRIPT: Joe Buck, Troy Aikman and Stephanie Druley Media Call

The post Monday Night Football’s Joe Buck and Troy Aikman Media Call appeared first on ESPN Press Room U.S..

Filed Under: ESPN, NFL, transcript

TRANSCRIPT – NBC SPORTS 2022 WINTER OLYMPICS AND SUPER BOWL LVI CONFERENCE CALL

February 10, 2022 By admin

Thursday, Feb. 10, 2022

Pete Bevacqua

Molly Solomon

Mike Tirico

THE MODERATOR: Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining us for today’s call. These are obviously historic times in our world with the ongoing pandemic, which has also made for historic times in the sports media space for NBC Sports and our entire company.

Our topics today are NBC and Peacock’s Winter Olympics coverage as well as their Super Bowl 56 coverage coming up this Sunday right in the heart of these Olympics. Reminder that the Super Bowl will also be on Telemundo for the first time.

Mike Tirico is doing something that’s never been done, and likely won’t ever be duplicated, hosting the primetime Olympics from Beijing for several nights, now hosting in our Stamford IBC for a couple nights, and then on to LA tomorrow to host both the Olympics and Super Bowl pregame show, which begins at 1:00 p.m. eastern time on Sunday.

Mike will return to Stamford on Monday to host week 2 of the Olympics, FYI. We’re joined today by Mike, as well as our NBC Olympics executive producer Molly Solomon, and by NBC Sports chairman Pete Bevacqua.

PETE BEVACQUA: Thanks, everybody, for joining us today. Greg, as you said, it’s certainly an exciting time for us and an unprecedented time, when you think about the fact that we’re in the midst of the Beijing Olympics with the Super Bowl right on the horizon, and the fact that we have the power of the Winter Olympics and the Super Bowl at the same time.

It is an absolute honor for all of us at NBC Sports and NBC. As I’ve said to the team repeatedly, if we can’t get excited and revved up about this, we’re certainly in the wrong business.

It’s been a busy time for sure. It feels like it was yesterday we were in Tokyo for the summer Games, and with only a six-month break, to come right into Beijing. I was recently in Beijing, I spent about 10 days there with Mike, and thinking about all the preparation that has gone into these Games, to have had two Olympics in six months with the necessary COVID protocols, everything to bring these Games to life during a global pandemic, it has certainly been a difficult environment to pull these Games off.

When you think about the beauty of the Olympic Games, the Olympic ideal, I really applaud the IOC for bringing these Games to life. Gary Zenkel, who’s the president of our Olympic team and I had dinner with Thomas Bach in Beijing a few nights ago, and we really congratulated him for pulling this off.

For us it’s been difficult. There’s no way around this. To bring these Games to life with all of the different hurdles that have come our way has been a challenge, but we a certainly have the right quarterback in Molly Solomon who you’re going to hear from shortly, and the job that Mike Tirico has done in Tokyo, now in Beijing, soon with the Super Bowl in LA, is really impressive to say the least, and I think he’s at the top of his game.

To go back to the idea that we have these Games and that we have the power of the Super Bowl, certainly there have been some challenges that have come with that, people working hard, people working overtime. But without a doubt, the positives and the benefits of that far outweigh the challenges, from a marketing perspective, from a sales perspective, — I believe that rising tides lift all ships. The Super Bowl is going to help the Olympics; the Olympics are going to help the Super Bowl; and I think all of this will coalesce on Sunday while we’re calling Super Bowl Sunday.

The fact that you can wake up on Sunday and have wonderful Olympic coverage for hours before the Super Bowl and then we move into Mike and the pregame, and obviously our Super Bowl coverage right through handing out of the Lombardi Trophy and then going immediately back to live Olympic Games coverage, if that’s not a powerful combination of bringing the beauty of sports.

Clearly the two biggest events in sports when you think about the Olympic Games and the Super Bowl, and the fact that they’re coming together is important for us, and it’s part of our strategy. It’s no secret when we were talking to the NFL about renewing our Sunday Night Football agreement it was important that we could have our Super Bowl years during our winter Olympic years, and we’re seeing success from that this year as we head towards the Super Bowl.

And we think the Super Bowl is going to provide an unbelievable powerful platform, to have that 100 million plus audience where we can obviously cover the game and every aspect of what’s been a wonderful NFL season, but also promote the Olympics and promote week 2 of these Beijing Games.

We’ve been really pleased with everything so far, despite the difficult challenges that we’ve faced during these Games, and I think we’re set up for a wonderful end of this week, a wonderful weekend, and then hopefully a great week 2 of Beijing.

But nobody can talk more thoroughly about what has gone into these Games than our very own Molly Solomon. Molly, take it away.

MOLLY SOLOMON: Thank you, Pete. It’s so fun to have this phone call today because it’s on the heels of a really exhilarating, uplifting 36 hours in the control room with the gold medal performances of Lindsey Jacobellis, Chloe Kim, and Nathan Chen, such an Olympic story of personal resolve and commitment.

And tonight Shaun White takes his final run in a legendary career live in primetime. And if you haven’t heard, Mikaela Shiffrin is going to race the Super G. So we’re going to have that immediately following the halfpipe at 10:00 p.m. Such an incredible lineup tonight.

Looking back nearly a week into these Games, I really believe we’ve met the challenges of, as what’s Pete called a truly unprecedented Beijing Games, in every way we can.

We’ve kept our commitment to produce storylines that document all of the triumphs and setbacks of Team USA and other key aspects of the game, and we did not shy away from our responsibility to place these Games in the proper geopolitical context as evidenced by our strong analysis during the opening ceremonies.

We did that without diminishing the athletes’ moments and the spectacle of that beautiful ceremony. For today, it’s incredibly easy for me to share with you how proud we are of the presentation thus far. There have been some fierce headwinds for these Olympics, but it’s really only inspired our NBC Olympic team, and we can’t wait for these Games and this work to continue.

For context, I wanted to put together some numbers to share with you so you can better understand our efforts. We have 1,600 people working here in Stamford, and our NBC Sports headquarters — it feels a lot like an International Broadcast Center in an Olympic city. With the Olympic city of Beijing being 13 hours ahead, day is night here and night is day here. We also have 600 teammates based in Beijing. Production, engineering and operations, and many of those people are taking on multiple jobs, playing out of position to help us pull off these 2,800 hours of competition.

And our reporters frankly have taken on even more responsibility because they are our eyes and ears for our production, and many of them are doing double duty.

The complexity of what we’re doing is also kind of mindboggling as we toggle back and forth across 6,800 miles.

Here are some stats for you: we have 203 HD feeds coming from China to our NBC Sports headquarters, and we’ve got 101 feeds going back to our IBC and our venues in China.

How about this one: the figure skating announcers and pictures travel under the Pacific Ocean three times in order to get on the air, so that’s 20,000 miles in seven tenths of a second. An extraordinary job by our engineering and operations team.

And somehow we also got Mike Tirico to Beijing and back, and he was on the air stateside last night. As Pete said, he’s primed for an unprecedented Olympic-Super Bowl double.

A week into the coverage, some production headlines from me: we’ve had several standout new analysts, including a trio of Olympic champs. I don’t know if you’ve heard Hannah Kearney on moguls, but you can catch her tonight in Prime Plus. She’ll be calling the team aerials competition.

Ted Ligety has been excellent on alpine skiing, and Kelly Clark, an Olympic champ, is joining us for snowboarding big air.

They’ve all been incredibly entertaining and instructive. That really is one of my favorite parts of producing the Olympics, is watching these new analysts emerge. They’re champions in their sports, but then they become really good broadcasters over the course of the Games.

There’s some names you might now know. Katherine Adamek has been excellent on short track and replays and explaining that crazy sport.

Tom Wallisch has been a breath of fresh air on freestyle big air.

And finally, my favorite part is waking up each morning, whenever that is, to coffee and curling. I just love listening to Kenny Rice and Tyler George.

So everything is really, really coming together, and I just so admire and respect this production team.

And finally, I wanted to also call out what’s new and improved in our coverage, which is pretty extraordinary when you consider, as we talked about, the headwinds with COVID.

We have the most production technology we’ve ever had in a Winter Olympics, and I think it’s really helping the viewers better understand these sports that they don’t know so much about. If you watched the halfpipe last night we had the jump height meter, and that actually is coming from Germany into our Beijing truck real time.

There’s a speedometer on alpine skiing for the speed events. And if you watched Nathan Chen last night, we’ve added four super slo-mo cameras, one in each of the corners in figure skating to really help you to better understand these incredible quadruple jumps that both the men and the women are performing.

Now we get to look forward to the middle weekend of the Olympics and Super Bowl Sunday, and we will, as Pete said, throw from the Lombardi Trophy presentation back to Beijing for two live gold medals.

We’re ready, and I think Mike Tirico is ready. Have you had any coffee? How are you doing there?

MIKE TIRICO: I am great. I was thinking this morning as I was taking a walk to get coffee about two years ago, and I was in this building where we are now, our NBC Sports headquarters, and Molly and my other boss in terms of production here at NBC, Sam Flood, both presented me with a piece of paper with a plan to work both projects that I’m lucky enough to be the host of — our NFL coverage and our Olympic coverage — and how to pull this off in the same weekend in two different continents.

It sounded really cool. Like, okay, well, I’ll put that in the back of my mind for a while. As it gets closer and closer, we’ve had the pandemic and other issues come in between, but still we are finding a way to do it, and I am eternally grateful to everybody involved to help make this happen.

Here we are, and I could not be more thrilled and more excited about it. When you do this job as a TV sports host, it’s a blessing to work at the network level, and without question the Super Bowl is the biggest sporting event in America. Without question the Olympics are the biggest sporting event in the world.

If you do what we do, what I get the honor of doing, the chance to do both once in a career is beyond belief and beyond dreams, and the chance to do both in the same weekend, let alone the same day, is beyond words.

I am thrilled, excited about it, can’t wait for it, and look forward to answering any of your questions here along the way.

Molly, I’m surprised in the breakout new analyst, you didn’t mention Lindsey Vonn’s studio premier on Sunday with Rebecca and Lindsey. Just for all of you guys, I know you had three straight days of ratings increases over the weekend, but just wondering on earlier in the week and everything how the numbers are looking, and any concern with Monday and Wednesday with Nathan’s skates going beyond midnight on the East Coast, but had to help you out on the West Coast since it was around 9:00 or 9:15 pm.

PETE BEVACQUA: I would tell you, ratings, they are about where we thought they would be in terms of our estimates. We had a strong weekend. It appears that last night is going to be a very strong night for us in terms of where our estimate was. It looks like it’s going to be to have beaten Monday and Tuesday.

You think about the coverage of last night, we’re sitting here today, Molly and Mike and the team are preparing for tonight, and when you think about the combination of Shaun White and Mikaela Shiffrin, seeing how she’ll perform on the Super G tonight, I think we have a good night ahead of us, as well.

So we’ve seen this momentum. Obviously linear ratings are down across the board, but we have been satisfied in terms of what we expected, and we also have been very pleased with the performance of Peacock and the streaming numbers have really been off the charts for us.

I think admittedly, perhaps I’m a bit biased, but I think we’ve made real drastic improvements on what we’ve done with Peacock. When you grade our performance in Tokyo versus Beijing, and when you see the reception that Peacock has received from the Peacock subscribers and the Peacock customers, the fact that you can go there for all things Olympic has been a nice supplement to all of our prime coverage, our prime plus and our prime west coverage.

I also think we’re excited about the impact the Super Bowl will have as we move into the weekend, go through Sunday and really kind of, as I like to say to the team, boomerang into next week.

We think bringing the power of the Olympics and talking about it to the massive Super Bowl audience over the course of Sunday, and using that time strategically to introduce that larger viewing population to some of these Olympic heroes will benefit us as we move into week 2.

Molly, what’s it been like running things from Stamford? Do you find yourself trying to live on Beijing time while doing everything or East Coast time? How are you doing it?

MOLLY SOLOMON: Oh, that’s a good question. We are keeping Beijing hours. We do a 5:00 p.m. production meeting eastern time with our folks in Beijing, so imagine they’re getting up really early.

We’re coming in at midday, and then we’re on from approximately 8:00 p.m. eastern to 2:00, 2:30 in the morning eastern time, and then we regroup until about 5:00 in the morning and they continue in Beijing, which is great.

So as news breaks, and the night events in Beijing happen, they’re making changes and alterations to our primetime format. So while our team goes home to sleep for a couple of hours and comes back midday, we exchange notes and literally hand off from Beijing to East Coast time.

It’s a crazy schedule, but it’s the Olympics. It’s what we expect, and we love to do it.

MIKE TIRICO: Working now my fourth Olympics, three with the primetime and the late night group, Prime Plus, the one thing you realize is you don’t sleep much, no matter where you are.

The most common text amongst me, Molly, and Rob Hyland, our producer who’s done an unbelievable job in the chair producing these shows, is usually followed by the other one responding to one of us, ‘What are you doing up?’ Because we’re all up at hours we shouldn’t be up.

It’s a 24/7 operation right now, and most of us are putting in 18 or 19 of the 24 (hours) each day, and wouldn’t want it any other way. This is what we prepare for and it’s what we do, but it’s been a lot of fun for sure.

From your perspective, what gives you optimism that the linear numbers for these Games are not something that will be a carryover for Paris and beyond, and that is really just about the current environment that we’re in and all of the things that obviously have been discussed about these Games?

PETE BEVACQUA: It’s a good question, and obviously one we’ve given a lot of thought to as we’ve discussed this internally. You know the ratings pressures across the board in the industry, and obviously we don’t need to get into that.

When you think about the fact that we’re holding these Games during a pandemic, that the Tokyo Games were postponed for a year, which kind of threw off this cycle, that we’ve had two Olympics within six months of one another, that despite the fact that these have been unbelievable events for these Olympic athletes who train their entire lives and in the vast majority of instances only have one shot at Olympic glory, and at the end of the day that’s truly what the Olympic ideal is all about, but it’s no secret that athletes in masks, venues without spectators, so much of the passion and excitement, those great moments of Olympic athletes hugging their family and friends and spouses and partners, so much of that magic is just out of necessity not present.

Just think about the 2020 season for major leagues, whether it’s the NFL, Major League Baseball, the NBA, golf versus the ’21 season, and I think the NFL is a perfect example. Look at the difference in NFL ratings in ’21 compared to ’20. I think one of the main differences is because in ’20, we didn’t have the passionate NFL fan base in those stadiums adding to the atmosphere. We did our best out of necessity.

But this year, those fans were back and the ratings showed that. The fact that we’ve been able to bring these Games to life during a pandemic with only a six-month window between the two, the ratings are — of course we always want to have the ratings better — but the ratings for these Games, as I said, are about where we thought they’d be.

Why I’m energized is I think about where we’re going, think about Paris and Italy and LA. And knock on wood, not just for the Olympics, but for the sake of all of us, hopefully this pandemic is well beyond us by then, we have those spectators back in these venues bursting at the seams, we have those passionate family and friends and athletes without masks hugging each other and celebrating these Olympic achievements. We have our eye on that normalized future coming back into focus as we work our way through this pandemic, so that’s why we’re hopeful.

Despite having two Olympics in six months during a pandemic, the media dominance of these Games is still unparalleled. Tokyo, we in effect had 18 Sunday Night Football games in a row. This year we are dominating the primetime landscape again with the Olympics, and layer on top of that the Super Bowl.

Hey, we’re never going to rest on our laurels. We’re always going to try to get better, smarter, and do the best job we can, but we are certainly hopeful that we can turn this pandemic corner and get things closer to where they’ve been in the past in terms of ratings.

THE MODERATOR: One thing I would add on top of that is the social media factor of American fans being there, seeing their families, etc., and putting that stuff out on all the various social media platforms creates a buzz, and we have not been able to generate that buzz with Tokyo and Beijing and those viral moments of people experiencing the host city, etc.

Molly, understanding what the likelihood is of NBC making a formal request to interview Peng Shuai?

MOLLY SOLOMON: We’ve not made that request because she’s gone back into quarantine and left the Olympic bubble. I also think it’s really important — if we were to have an interview with her, we would need to know that we could ask any question and there wouldn’t necessarily be anyone else in the room, and I don’t know that right now is the right place to do that. But I think in the future we’ll have the opportunity.

But I will say, as she went from venue to venue over the weekend we made sure and Mike put into perspective that she was with the IOC President visiting the venues and followed up on that story all weekend long.

Question for either Pete or Molly: We’ve seen some integrations in the Olympic broadcast from the recent Salesforce partnership and some of the data and analytics, what they’ve been doing. I was hoping you could detail how you’re measuring the success or effectiveness of those integrations and in the early going what you’ve found to be the case and whether they are working from a fan engagement perspective.

PETE BEVACQUA: I would tell you we work hand-in-hand with our ad sales team led by Linda Yaccarino, Mark Marshall and Dan Lovinger and the back and forth we have with them, what we are hearing from them, and they are, as you can imagine our colleagues that are having the direct conversations with our ad partners, is that people have been incredibly pleased so far to-date with the integration of the ads.

It’s kind of a constant dialogue between them and our customers and those that are supporting these Games.

I’d like to say, I think we’ve done a good job of integrating these, making them additive to the coverage, additive to the storytelling without being distracting, so I think we’re kind of hitting that in an effective and efficient way.

Then of course after the Games, like we always do, we’ll regroup. We’ll go out and ask for their recommendations and their belief on how it went, and always try to improve it going forward. At this juncture here on Thursday of this opening week of the Olympics, things seem to be going quite well in that regard.

Mike, can you tell us a little more about what the life of Mike Tirico has been like the last number of days with the time zone changes, the flights, and what it was like to be over there for a little while?

MIKE TIRICO: Sure, happy to. I will say that being over there was very interesting. Being in the bubble meant you truly were separated from one of the biggest cities in the world. You would pull up to the hotel and a fence would close behind you and that hotel area was fenced in. Same was true with the broadcast center, same was true with the venues.

So the bubbles, you can go in and out of the other bubbles, but not mix in with the 21 million people of Beijing.

For me, I think for any of us who have covered the Olympics, that’s what you miss. You miss being around a host city. I missed sitting in Rio and having coffee and being able to speak with the people who live in Rio de Janeiro. Same thing in South Korea, to be able to eat kimchi there and get a sense what that’s like. Missed that in Tokyo a little bit and missed it completely in Beijing. For me, that was the disappointing part of this experience for sure.

But I will say, and we can always give teammates credit, but the people who were on the ground working for NBC, Molly gave you the numbers before, what an extraordinary job they have done. Many of them have been over there for over a month, so to be over for two weeks and in the bubble and not be able to really just go for a walk outside when you’d like is a small inconvenience to the sacrifice of a month or two months that they’ve made. I’m eternally grateful to my teammates over there in that regard.

For me, it’s been pretty easy. Try to be on the time of where you’re going. When we got on the plane in China a couple of days ago, the goal was get myself on East or West Coast time, so when we landed I was ready to hit the ground running.

We’ll do that after tonight’s show, head out to Los Angeles and pretend we’re on Pacific time and be ready for Super Bowl meetings on Friday out there before doing our Olympic coverage.

It has been exhilarating, not exhausting. We worked a lot in the month before this was coming up to be ready for this, and my goodness, we have great production teams on both sides. When I get off this call, Matt Casey, who’s one of our Super Bowl producers, Matt is going to FaceTime me and I’m going to walk through the rehearsal for the Lombardi Trophy that I would normally be doing in person. Then we have a two-hour meeting to talk about the content of our pregame show that I’ll just do via Microsoft Teams. And then we’ll hop into our production meeting for tonight’s primetime show and then do the primetime show.

It’s been time management. It’s been get a good night’s sleep where you can, and it has been as good as I hoped it would be. I’m just hoping that the weekend pays that off.

Watching the first couple of nights, the conversations that you had on air, yourself with Savannah, with your guests about the geopolitics in China and some of the very forthright things you were able to say, how important was it for you to be able to say them? And Molly, address how important it was for you as the executive producer for them to be able to be said on air.

MIKE TIRICO: Sure. I’ll be happy to go first. It was important because it was part of the story. We can’t hide from what is a part and essential to the coverage of the story.

I think we tried to make a very fine delineation between becoming a public affairs broadcast and how did it impact the Olympics, and certainly where we were and who was there mattered.

That’s why Molly and Pete both thought it was really important that I was physically there for the opening ceremony, and I’m so glad I was. Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin were 25 yards away in the stadium. You could just get a sense of the history of the moment by being there.

We spent a lot of time getting ready for these Games and what it meant not just to the sports fan, but what it meant to the world in general. I’m very, very proud of my alma mater, Syracuse University and love that my journalism education was there, but I had a dual degree. My other degree was political science. You can ask any of our NBC News colleagues, when our paths intersect I wear them out talking politics and all that is about international relations in our world.

This was something that’s of deep interest to me, and, boy, did we have great experts in Andy Brown and Jing Tsu, who are our experts in China and remain with us as needed for our coverage the next couple of weeks.

And obviously Savannah is as good as it gets, so to have her there, as well. We hopefully addressed the issues that mattered.

You’ll never satisfy everyone, especially in our country in 2022. People may say, “Oh, you talked too much about politics; oh, I want a little bit more of this, a little bit more of that.” That’s what the Opening Ceremony is. The Opening Ceremony is always this incredible mix of politics, what the athletes are wearing, and celebration and party. It’s really this very unique catchall event.

We tried to bring that to folks, and at the same time, spend the time Thursday on the issues that really impact America and the athletes of the world as the spotlight was on China.

I’m really, really proud of not what I did but what our team did. Our editorial team spent hours. Joe Gesue, Ron Vaccaro, a couple of names that don’t get mentioned, but tireless work that we all did to make sure that we did what we thought was the right thing to do to set the table for American viewers.

I hope that the conversation inspired people to spend more time on international relations. We live in a very complex and amazing country, but, man, there’s a really interesting world out there and a very interesting time.

The Olympics helped open my eyes and educated me. I’ve done more international-based reading than I have in years, and it made me realize that we are at a unique time. It was an honor to share some of that, and I’m really proud that under Molly’s leadership, we got the go-ahead to tackle these issues and be straightforward and honest with our viewers. We wanted the comebacks. We wanted to be honest with them, and hopefully we did the right thing by them.

So thanks. It may be a little longer than you asked for, but I appreciate the opportunity.

MOLLY SOLOMON: I think he said it all. It really was, I thought, an extraordinary moment, this nexus of sports and international relations.

Going in, we promised ourselves and we thought it was essential for the viewers to provide perspective on China’s complicated relationship with the rest of the world. It was really essential to set the stage for these Games during that ceremony, and we really accomplished that and were incredibly satisfied with how we pulled it off.

Imagine in the moments when we found out that the cauldron lighter was from Xinjiang, and kudos to Mike Tirico and Savannah Guthrie, to frame that moment, to connect it to all the other perspective we had provided throughout that ceremony.

That’s real-time television, a live opening ceremony, and I thought they did an extraordinary job of presenting that moment.

So incredibly proud of the team. As Mike said, we can’t say enough about the people behind the scenes who prep all of us and our experts, in particular Joe Gesue and Ron Vaccaro, who also worked very hard.

We did extensive interviewing to find the right analysts and experts to join us on air, so we really appreciate Jing Tsu taking time off from Yale and Andy Brown from Bloomberg to really help us frame the moment.

It was an important night for NBC Sports and NBCUniversal.

Molly, I know you mentioned some of the technology and production element highlights at the top, but anything else that’s really impressed you guys this year, especially some of the StroMotion stuff, the motion systems, rail cams, cable cams that OBS is providing? Also, how is the off-tube remote announcing operation working out so far this year in Stamford?

MOLLY SOLOMON: As you know, it’s such a closely affiliated relationship with OBS, the Olympic broadcasting service, and we depend on them even more during a pandemic. We’ve worked really closely with them, and they’re providing pictures at a number of our venues. If you watched Alpine the last few nights, the severity and steepness of this hill, I think they’re doing a really remarkable job covering the Alpine venue with the rail cams.

Have you seen the aerial of the extreme sports venues? When you see in the distance the moguls field to what they’re saying is the best halfpipe ever. I think it’s been really extraordinary coverage, and imagine that OBS is experiencing the same thing that NBC is trying to get folks into the country in the middle of a pandemic.

So the fact that there’s been no dropoff in the coverage is kudos to OBS.

As you said, there’s so many — I can’t list them all, of the enhancements that we’ve added, but the StroMotion in Alpine and also at figure skating, we’ve also got this amazing new tracker which shows how high in the air the figure skaters go on their jumps and how far they jump. So we’ll be using that in enhanced replay sequences.

Overall we are ecstatic over what both OBS and we have been able to pull off in the face of a pandemic.

Any thoughts on the remote announcing, the off-tube factory in Stamford? Has that been successful?

MOLLY SOLOMON: You know, we’ve gotten really good at this. We’ve been doing this for two and a half years because of the pandemic. You would always love to have your announcers on-site, but we had to pivot, like we do every single day with all of the headwinds that we run into, and we made the decision in January to ensure the integrity of the broadcast that we pulled our play-by-play and analysts home, but we made sure that we had reporters on-site because it’s most important to talk to the athletes and cover breaking news, and we have cameras at every single venue in the mixed zone.

In the beginning you wish you were there, but I think we’ve done a lot of really neat things with the fact that we’ve got all these announcers together. I don’t know if you watched the Alpine coverage last night, but Ted Ligety and Steve Porino were in a studio in Stamford, and they explained how sharp the blade of an Alpine ski is, and they cut up watermelon, papaya, and Ligety then opened a bottle of champagne, and that’s something we couldn’t have done in a small commentary booth on the hill in Beijing.

We have made the best of these circumstances, and actually I think it’s enhanced the storytelling.

THE MODERATOR: Thank you, everybody, for joining us today. If you have any follow-up, reach out to the NBC Sports communications team and we will accommodate you. Pete, Molly and Mike, thanks for the time, and thank you, everybody.

Filed Under: 2022 Beijing Olympics, NBC, Super Bowl LVI, transcript

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Archives

Archives

Copyright © 2026 ·News Pro Theme · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · Powered by WordPress.com.Log in