February 4, 2012

Conference Call Replay with ESPN NFL Draft Expert Mel Kiper Jr.

Conference Call Replay with ESPN NFL Draft Expert Mel Kiper Jr.
ESPN conducted a media conference call Thursday, April 16 with NFL Draft expert Mel Kiper Jr. To hear a full replay of the call, visit: http://www.espnmediazone.com/ccc (Access to call requires login/password). Select comments from the conference call:
On Texas Tech wide receiver Michael Crabtree’s medical concerns and how he might be the Adrian Peterson of this year’s draft …
“I don’t think the injury affected him that much because he was projected to go fourth to Seattle prior to that, long before anybody signed any free agents.  Now he’s projected to go fifth to Cleveland.  So it’s not a huge drop for him.  At least he was able to save himself from dropping out of the top 10.  He could (do) very well, if he gets back to where he needs to be physically, which he will, and granted his speed question is going to be there lingering, but at the end of the day a lot of receivers in this league who didn’t run great 40’s, turned out to be very effective.  Obviously, the concern is the juniors coming out early, the third-year sophomores sometimes transition more slowly. … He’s potentially the best offensive player in this draft and for the Cleveland Browns who need a wide receiver, he should be a real good fit there eventually.”
On Georgia’s Matthew Stafford going No. 1 and teams possibly moving spots at the top of the draft …
“I would expect Stafford to go No. 1.  I don’t have any inside information on what Detroit’s thinking in terms of obviously they want to have this guy signed before the draft if they can.  To me it would be the obvious pick.  That’s what they need.  People say, well, since Cutler’s in the division with Aaron Rodgers, they have to.  I think that decision should based be on how Stafford is as a player, not based on quarterbacks in the division. … The decision on Stafford should have been made a long time ago, whether they were going to make him the No. 1 pick overall.  In terms of trades, you just don’t see any.  It’s not like the 90’s, 80’s and 70’s where teams were moving up and down and around.  The top five or six aren’t going to be traded.  It’s just too expensive both from a financial standpoint and from a pick standpoint as to what you have to give up. Normally the activity starts around seven or eight.  All the speculation is about Jacksonville at eight trading down. … You figure to have a lot of activity in the middle of the first round.  We always do. That eight pick to Jacksonville, if the receiver’s not there that they target, then that would be a space someone might jump in there to get Mark Sanchez you would think.”
On USC quarterback Mark Sanchez …
“Had he gone back, he would have been battling Sam Bradford to be the No. 1 pick overall.  That’s pretty guaranteed.  With the talent they have with Damian Williams, the great receiver there emerging this season, they would have had him in place to be the No. 1 pick overall or Bradford.  The fact that he comes out early, I thought he was the fifth-best player.  I talked to some people … they were amazed when people had him down the line like they did at 17 to the Jets in an early projection.  I have him 13 to Washington because I thought about putting him to Seattle and I was told not to.  I still think Seattle is a possibility.  And, once you don’t put him to Seattle, then you have a problem.  I had him at Jacksonville and was told that they like him but they aren’t going to take him. San Francisco, I’ve been told, they’re not going to take a quarterback.  Eight could be traded, 10 could be traded.  That means someone can jump in there. … He’s a hot guy right now because of the fact that he’s what you want in terms of accuracy.  And that’s not just in the pocket, that’s not just when he has all day to throw. He can roll right, he can roll left and throw accurately.  His completion percentage was through the roof at around 66 percent this year.  His touchdown-interception ratio was outstanding.  He played through that knee injury early on and he didn’t have a great supporting cast early on.  Damian Williams emerged as the year went along.  His offensive line was a rebuilt group. … I think when you look at what he was able to do this year with the numbers he put up, and the skill level he has and the football acumen, the smarts, the intelligence, the passion for the game, the enthusiasm for the game that he has, he’s got a lot of Chad Pennington in him.  He’s got a little bit of Troy Aikman, in terms of accuracy.  He’s got a lot of good quarterbacks wrapped up in Mark Sanchez.  That’s why all the buzz seems to be about Sanchez right now.”
On Florida wide receiver Percy Harvin…
“Couple weeks ago I had him going to Tennessee at the 30th pick.  At one point, I had him at No. 17 to the New York Jets.  But he is different.  He’s not a wide receiver per say, but a jack of all trades.  He’s a Reggie Bush with the Saints — not Reggie at USC, but Reggie with the Saints.  And that’s the kind of player he can be — running back, receiver, return man.  People talk about issues with Percy Harvin. The issue that’s not positive is an injury he played through in the Championship game.  He made the one big play of that game that turned the tide and helped Florida to win it.  And without him, they don’t beat Oklahoma in my opinion.  He’s got great value.  Of course, Reggie Bush was the second pick overall and this kid will be in the late first round with those same type of explosive skills and versatility. Late first round he’s got outstanding value.
Durability with Harvin is an issue as it has been for Bush at the pro level.  He’s only 195 pounds and he’s going to have to prove that he can stay healthy.  If you can keep him on the field, he’s going to put up a lot of all-purpose yards for you.”
On off-the-field character issues…
“It has to be weighed into the whole totality of evaluating a player. … There are a lot of things to concern yourself with when you’re investing these top dollars…character concerns.  You talk to some teams, who took them off the board, and some teams not affected at all. … A team that has been burned by an off-the-field issue, whatever it may be, they’re going to shy away.  If teams have had good success and have managed kids properly once they got to the NFL, they figure they mature, this is something they deal with, and than you have a different outlook.  There’s no set philosophy on this and off-the-field character issues.”
-30-

Speak Your Mind

*